I am not bossing you about :s my position does not make a difference to the truth in my post. What I am saying is you are choosing not to back up your points (which appear very unlikely, may I add) and for that reason they are extremely fallible.
James on the other hand has a sufficient amount of proof behind his points that I have seen, and therefore it makes sense that I and others would believe him over you; especially considering the fact you come across as a relatively rude and conceited individual.
Oh and, you're right, it is your choice if you want to show your evidence but if you want people to believe you, you do have to show evidence; that was the point I was making.







.

im completely against what notes is saying as it makes no sense. What sane company would consider manipulating their own system to make their clients feel that their security is at risk? also in which ways would this profit Sulake? If you can back up your points in any way then you may aswell give it. Until then, a small amount of people are going to believe what yo uare saying.














