Well i swear it was always like that, i'll check it up now.
As for as the MG says is to report to the Super Moderator if it happens often.

Well i swear it was always like that, i'll check it up now.
As for as the MG says is to report to the Super Moderator if it happens often.
Last edited by today; 29-02-2008 at 04:21 PM.
Here's just a real example of what I'm trying to say http://habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=460312 - He would of had time to read the other post, but instead posts what the guy above says. If he wishes to agree with the guy above I think he should add something constructive.I speak from experience here and it is true, Moderator's aren't pressured into target's or logs. You where just expected to get a reasonable amount of logs, if you didn't it was just accepted and you where expected to improve, and the case was if you didn't get enough in the monthly-a-so Moderator report quite regularly you got the sack, which I think is very fair. There is no set target's and your not pressured at all into getting loads.
Some Moderator's just tend to make targets for themselves, so they either 'Go up in the world' or just to make a mark in the forums, this isn't Habbox's fault.
I agree Pointless Posting is getting a bit silly and it does need to re-worded. Despite all this 'Habbox is Big Brother, I don't think the Pointless Posting rule is hard enough. I won't drop any names but loads of people are continually making useless replies cause of 'Loop-holes'. Here's a lame example, sorry I couldn't think of a better one
Someone creates a thread 'What is the date of bonfire night?'
'5th of November'
'It's the the 5th of November'
'I agree it's the 5th of November'
'I think it's the 5th of November
'5th of November'
It happens so much and people are ranking up their post-count so easily by repeating what has already been said, it makes reading threads a right nuisance at times. I'd really like to see this 'Loop-hole' looked into, as it's Pointless posting but they can get away with saying what's already been said.
Why he is agreeing? What is the problem with that? FGS this is a forumHere's just a real example of what I'm trying to say http://habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=460312 - He would of had time to read the other post, but instead posts what the guy above says. If he wishes to agree with the guy above I think he should add something constructive.
where people should enjoy themselves what is the problem here? Just scan down the thread - its not a great inconvenience. If you were in a normal conversation you would not say don't say 'you agree' say something constructive as well. It's like when somebody finds the post above funny
they quite often say LOL - that is expressing an opinion as well and is valid as far as I can see. Its pointless spam that should be cracked down on where it makes no sense at all and is random.
That example is good, i gave a detailed reply thus he didnt need to say what i said really.
But heh.
Hmm, I agree. In some cases we are enforcing the pointless/off topic rule too much and in other areas we are not.
Thanks for your feedback, much appreciated.
Last edited by ---MAD---; 29-02-2008 at 09:06 PM.
---MAD---
Completely agreed. I have to stop myself putting big red writing all over threads like that, its so frustrating seeing people using the wording of the rule to get their post count up.
It should be, I got told off for infracting it when I first became a mod![]()
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!