Moderation Changes Cont.

[-:Undertaker:-]

How come all these decisions are made without getting feedback before they're implemented?

Hahaha good point.

I've just been told that if I get cautioned then Im fired lol.

You haven't got long left then paul m8 xxoxo :8

[Slowpoke]

You haven't got long left then paul m8 xxoxo :8

He has, he's just realised that one expires sooner than he first anticipated

[PaulMacC]

All they need to do is merge the posts together (or remove them, depending) and put an edit line on. A warning for a double post which clearly was accidental (same time, day and year) is pointless.

Thats my point

[Slowpoke]

All they need to do is merge the posts together (or remove them, depending) and put an edit line on. A warning for a double post which clearly was accidental (same time, day and year) is pointless.

Hmm. What annoys me is that people are warned for 'accidental' double posting yet people who 'purposely' bump threads just get an edit (a PM at the most) since there is no preset infraction/warning for breaking the bump rule.

[Dan2nd]

Like I said in the other thread I think you should still get a PM when being warned.

Before I thought a warning was just well a 'warning' I didn't see it as such a serious thing now though you'll get cautioned after five =l that sucks so surely if they've become more serious you should still receive a PM 'telling you off'

[jesus]

Why are you making a big deal about this?

It doesn't matter how many infractions it takes for us to be banned and such.

They will give out less infractions.

And if you're good and won't be getting any infractions, why does it bother you? :S

Give up, you're not impressing anyone, Garion.

What about cautions?
I dont want to be setting a bad example to the rest of the forum as a staff member being cautioned.
They need to wise up with whats a warning and whats not.
You know the double posting rule should be demolished because someone makes a mistake and they get punished for it.

Don't break any rules and you'll be fine.

[GommeInc]

Hmm. What annoys me is that people are warned for 'accidental' double posting yet people who 'purposely' bump threads just get an edit (a PM at the most) since there is no preset infraction/warning for breaking the bump rule.

Exactly, and bumped threads are a helluva lot more disruptive than a double post which was accidental.

Not sending PMs when you are warned is breaking down communcation between members and management... This was meant to be solved.

[PaulMacC]

Yes but Im warned for the stupidist things.

[Slowpoke]

Yes but Im warned for the stupidist things.

It's because management more strict with staff because you're meant to set an example

[--ss--]

How come all these decisions are made without getting feedback before they're implemented?

There was a thread about this in the mod section as they are the main people who are going to be affected by this the most, There was also a tread about it here publically as someone leaked info about it and people did discuss it here .

Personally I do think the old system was just fine and this will make it a little confusing for me .