New rep changes.

[jrh2002]

I like the changes

I would prefer to rep 20 people before i could rep them again and the reason for that is I feel i am being forced to rep people i would not normally do so that I can rep the ones who I think deserve it. No big deal though and will probably get changed in time.

[Catzsy]

30 reps to spread at 5 per day = 6 days to spread fully
50 reps to spread at 10 per day = 5 days to spread fully

It actually makes it easier to get to the same person again in that sense, just means you have to pointlessly +rep a lot of people first.

Well I agree with everything except that you have to do pointless rep.
10 reps a day is a really good improvement and if you do tend to rep good posts a lot then it only takes a few days to do so again if you wish. I personally found 5 a day pretty restrictive.

Also giving 1 rep power for every year instead of every 2 years is also very good.

I understand why the rep was changed in the first place and feel this is a very good compromise and am very pleased to see it introduced.

[MissAlice]

Makes very little difference to me, I don't pointless rep whatsoever, and for me to +rep 5 posts in one day would be making history so 10 makes no difference whatsoever. If only every one used +rep for it's intended purpose, for posts that have helped you, posts that you have found really interesting or those that have taught you something, then perhaps the goal posts wouldn't of been moved in the first place.

[Judge Judy]

The momentum was getting higher for the first two changes then when I saw you have to spread 50 times before repping the same person kinda wrecked it.

But I can say you have listened to us.. kind of.

[GommeInc]

I'll add this to the next council report. 50 is far too high and the majority want less, possibly 30? They can't deny it, 100+ people vs. 10 people who are no more smarter than the rest of us :rolleyes:

[cocaine]

pmsl you'd have to pointless rep A LOT of people to spread again..

[Jordy]

There's no way 50 other people will deserve reputation before the same person deserves it again. But oh well.

Spot on! I don't rep many people unless they make exceptionally good threads or points, and sadly there's not many users (Certainly not 50!) that make decent threads, posts or points in an argument so it looks like once I rep someone I could never rep them again for years. 30 was a little over the top, I would of been satisfied and shut up on 20.

Rep power used to be as easy to get in all ways, like you went to the same length to be around for a year as you did to make 2500 decent posts. However it's now rather easy to be registered for a year and still using the forum compared to than it is to make 5000 posts. I think it takes about 2 years to make 5000 decent posts but that's just my opinion if that makes sense. I really think the 5000 posts is too much.

[Smiddy]

Biohazard's proposal is quite ludacris, rep 10 people a day, with 10 people before you rep the same person? Works out as 10 reps per 11 days technically!

I have to admit, I did not expect the number to raised to 50 - I'm glad to see my other proposals were placed Minor change but a change nonetheless

[Ailo Gaup]

I voted don't care

[today]

I've voted Dont care as im not one to use the reputation system alot.