Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 6 of 14 FirstFirst ... 2345678910 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 139
  1. #51
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    910
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Axel View Post
    What's pro about saying the comment was biased?

    No, he always acts as if he knows everything about certain subjects.
    I was telling him not to.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    223
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    I think we would need a WWIII then to see which is the strongest country! I am not biased ok, I was only saying India because it is a very large nation with a huge population!
    Also they are developing very fast! from 3rd world to 2nd world! maybe in a few years Developed country!

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    7,202
    Tokens
    203

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    china or russia

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Coventry
    Posts
    2,467
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Russia, purely because the manpower and resources needed to invade the enite nation and eliminate any resistance and set it up as a secure nation would be immense.

    You have to take into account that people will fight more fiercely defending their homeland and families. That not all nations are flat plateau's with paved roads and moderate weather for you to march your army across. The Americans in WW2 would have spent years and thousands more lives Island Hopping to get to the heart of Japan like they were doing.

    I think I'm going to go with Israel on this one - if under attack very few nations would be able to cope with the heat, the terrain varies greatly and their intelligence services are one of the best in the world. Add all that to well trained troops with good modern equipment and a great patriotism, and you've got yourself a fairly solid enemy.

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    7,554
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PaintYourTarget View Post
    Russia, purely because the manpower and resources needed to invade the enite nation and eliminate any resistance and set it up as a secure nation would be immense.

    You have to take into account that people will fight more fiercely defending their homeland and families. That not all nations are flat plateau's with paved roads and moderate weather for you to march your army across. The Americans in WW2 would have spent years and thousands more lives Island Hopping to get to the heart of Japan like they were doing.

    I think I'm going to go with Israel on this one - if under attack very few nations would be able to cope with the heat, the terrain varies greatly and their intelligence services are one of the best in the world. Add all that to well trained troops with good modern equipment and a great patriotism, and you've got yourself a fairly solid enemy.
    What about Russia? It is bloody cold during winter...


    Germany will not be a strong country again I don't think!

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    11,690
    Tokens
    0
    Habbo
    Pyroka

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Ukraine.

    They're strong, because they're neutral.

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    6,050
    Tokens
    1,435

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by visa View Post
    everyone loves the numbers. they provide "an easy answer" that is not always necessarily correct.

    first off, to confront the attitude that france is a weak country which it seems most british people have to some degree - incidentally, france is the strongest european nation when it comes to military strength. they have the largest, most intensely trained and best equipped army in all of europe.

    second, it seems to be some sort of a fad that you guys are just picking up on that we need to all be scared of china and that they're going to take over the world. please, that was new about ten years ago when their economy first started picking up. china is powerful, and that is a given. in fact, individually they are arguably the most powerful nation in the world (but this is only arguable, and not fact). even if the thread is asking for a single country, china is a bit of a worldwide pariah and would be up against a force of nations that outpower them with ease. in addition, bigger is not always better. take belgium in world war two - such a powerless, defenseless nation was able to hold against the (huge, powerful) nazi army for days before they fell to hitler. china is not the be all and end all.

    india is not powerful. they have an army that is about as effective as schoolboys through a two week training program equipped with some faulty rifles. they would have trouble going against a nation like pakistan - a country that is smaller but easily more powerful.

    canada. granted, the canadians are known to have a small army and are generally the target of ridicule when it comes to military strength, the canadian army is one of the best trained armies in the world. canada has proven itself militarily time and time again throughout history. in either of the world wars, it was the canadian army that was able to win battles that neither the americans nor the british could win. take a look at the battles of ypres, the somme, vimy ridge, juno beach and the other highlights of canadian military achievement. not only that, but as far as a strategic nation physically, canada is probably the most important nation in the world. not only does canada hold control of one of the worlds largest supplies of oil, canada also has the largest supply of fresh (drinkable) water in the world (which is quickly becoming important). canada also holds control of the northwest passage, which is probably the most important shipping and military passage in history since the panama canal.

    america seems to have suffered a lot of stigma since the begin of george w bush's presidency. without going in to any detail because you have all heard it before, america is still one of the most powerful, if not the most powerful nation in the world. poised to enter union with mexico and canada within the next fifty years, north america should not be discounted at any level. russia, on the other hand, is just beginning to flex their muscles since the fall of the soviets in the late eighties and early nineties. no one can be sure what to expect from them but it is certainly not a huge threat. their army has dwindled and they are dealing with one of the fastest shrinking populations in the world. their dated technology does not help them any either.

    the bottom line here if a lot of people love to look at numbers and only numbers. sure, china has lots of fit to serve citizens. china also has lots of fit to serve underground resistance forces. just because germany was under the rule of the nazis during world war two does not account for the fact that thousands if not hundreds of thousands of germans opposed hitler and secretly sabotaged many nazi efforts across europe which was a great factor in the fall of nazi germany. there are many factors that play in to national power and just because china or russia have numbers on their side certainly does not guarantee either of them power of victory.
    since when did Canada fight in ypres, the sommes or other WWI battles?


    Image removed by Bolt660 (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not have images in your signature which exceed the maximum limits for your usergroup.

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    new york.
    Posts
    11,188
    Tokens
    2,270

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    depends on who attacks first. plenty of countries have nukes, so they can wipe out a country without anyone having any time to respond.

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Hull, England
    Posts
    4,483
    Tokens
    341

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    If it wasn't for the SAS, US military would be ****** right now, that was to Joshuae, in reply anyways.

    I reckon China or Russia. But idk.



    pc setup | system specs
    check what i've been watching here.
    avril lavigne ♥

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    6,050
    Tokens
    1,435

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RedStratocas View Post
    depends on who attacks first. plenty of countries have nukes, so they can wipe out a country without anyone having any time to respond.
    I think it takes 6 minutes for a nuclear weapon to go from Russia- USA or something ridulous like that. George Bush has someone following him wherever he goes, with 'that red button'.


    Image removed by Bolt660 (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not have images in your signature which exceed the maximum limits for your usergroup.

Page 6 of 14 FirstFirst ... 2345678910 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •