
To be honest mate it doesn't matter when they are read.
Since Elkaa is the person reading the emails, and MAD the one banning people for "having a negative attitude", no matter the opinion of the person reading the emails, MAD will always have the last say.
Forgive me for sounding rude MAD, but once you have made your mind up on a certain topic you rarely budge. I used to be able to explain things in a way which gave you another view on the situation, but I fear being a member now, my opinion means alot less and I am seen as another member being "negative" about the forum.
All matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration. We are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectivly. There is no such thing as death, life is only a dream and we're the imagination of ourselves.
Guess I'll have to take it directly to sierk then.To be honest mate it doesn't matter when they are read.
Since Elkaa is the person reading the emails, and MAD the one banning people for "having a negative attitude", no matter the opinion of the person reading the emails, MAD will always have the last say.
Forgive me for sounding rude MAD, but once you have made your mind up on a certain topic you rarely budge. I used to be able to explain things in a way which gave you another view on the situation, but I fear being a member now, my opinion means alot less and I am seen as another member being "negative" about the forum.
It's really frustrating making me go through all this trouble when I really have done nothing wrong. I actually took the time to read the thread that stirred all of this up earlier and now I can see why Nemo was banned, although he deserves a caution at the most because he is not constantly negative, but what I said compared to what he said is nothing. Nothing at all, yet we warrant the same punishment. I really don't understand their reasoning and methods. I also noticed that Jack said he wasn't allowed to post negative things as he had been warned that it would lead to a ban. If the management thought I was constantly negative, wheres my warning? This further proves that I'm not constantly negative at all and I was banned because of one measily sentence they didn't like in my post where I said they always have to be right and we always have to be wrong.I also read Forum's thread in the 'Ask the Forum Staff' section titled 'Negative Rule'. He asked if we're not allowed to be negative in general, or just negative to staff. He got some replies.
"The people that have been banned have just had constant negative views about Habbox and the decisions they make."
Thats not me then, as I only complained about the anime forum.
"Basically, if the majority of your posts consist of a negative attitude, then you will be punished for it."
That doesn't concern me either. I'm a constant help in the Anime, Movies and Nintendo section and a happy person in general.
"The type of punishment, for example; caution, temp ban, perm ban etc depends on the severity of your negativity."
I said one little negative thing and recieve and permanent ban? I'd hate to see what happens when you're actually constantly negative...
I really do wonder why I am banned. This is a massive mistake and I hope management (or MAD, whoever) will realise that and right what is wrong. By the looks of it though, I'm starting to wonder...
Yes I did say that, however, the way you've commented on what I said is unfair. You're speaking as though I was the one who banned you when I actually had nothing at all to do with your banning - What I said is the way the situations I've witnessed have been dealt with in the past.
I shouldn't comment on your banning and how I feel about it because I honestly don't know all the facts. However, looking at the thread, I don't personally believe that you did enough to warrant a ban and I think that you and Nemo should've both received a warning or a caution at most. All you can do is hope MAD will have a change of heart because as far as I know, the only people who can go over his head when it comes to overruling his decisions is Sierk
Last edited by Elkaa; 19-07-2008 at 10:58 PM.
I apologise if what I posted sounded like you were the one who banned me. I never intended to make it sound like that and know you have nothing to do with my ban. I was just replying like that to show how unfair my ban is.Yes I did say that, however, the way you've commented on what I said is unfair. You're speaking as though I was the one who banned you when I actually had nothing at all to do with your banning - What I said is the way the situations I've witnessed have been dealt with in the past.
I shouldn't comment on your banning and how I feel about it because I honestly don't know all the facts. However, looking at the thread, I don't personally believe that you did enough to warrant a ban and I think that you and Nemo should've both received a warning or a caution at most. All you can do is hope MAD will have a change of heart because as far as I know, the only people who can go over his head when it comes to overruling his decisions are sierk.
Last edited by Elkaa; 19-07-2008 at 10:58 PM.
Thanks for the sarcasm. And I see what you mean the person you're going to have to convince is MAD.
Image removed by Bolt660 (Forum Super Moderator): Please do not have images in your signature which exceed the maximum limits for your usergroup.
Your ban is pointless, most bans are anyway. Hopefully you'll get your account back, you're an important member![]()
LEFT
FOM & FOW
If you need me, feel free to PM me here for contact details.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!