Local elections 2011: voting intentions

[MrPinkPanther]

What you have to understand is that everybody is entitled to their freedom of speech, no matter what race they are and everybody is entitled to an opinion.
Some people are for gays and some people are against them, just like many other things in life just because its a touchy subject doesn't mean it shouldn't be talked about and you shouldn't voice your opinion. At least the BNP have the balls to publish comments such as that one, unlike many other political parties who couldn't give a damn about Britain.
I personally believe if you want to be gay, don't do it around me, don't feel me up on a night out etc, as long as it doesn't involve me it doesn't bother me, although i'll still probably get a load of grief for even saying that with all the characters on this forum.

As far as I'm concerned if it inspires unjust hatred towards a group of people then it shouldn't be said. Sure lets have a debate about it, lets argue the positives and negatives of Homosexuality, Islam and the like but one liners which inspire hatred have no place in mainstream politics. I don't think we should arrest people for going and saying things like they've said but you can't honestly claim that they aren't homophobic and are a credible party to run this country.

I personally believe if you want to be gay, don't do it around me, don't feel me up on a night out etc,

Made me laugh...and turned on.

A bit like global warming then.

Yeh...except most Scientists say global warming exists.

[Jordy]

How about the immigration cap? How about when David Cameron blatantly lied in the live tv debates before the election, stating that Hull police force had spent £73,000 on a Lexus police car which was totally un-true just to make Gordon Brown and Labour look like they were spending money recklessly?
In the live TV debates, Cameron also stated that he would be keeping pension credits? Click here.
Oh, what's that? The winter fuel allowance? Click here.
Free bus pass? Click here.

I think it's my turn to post a video?

Talking of lies, have you noticed in those articles it says could and not that the coalition will. For someone who's into their facts it's a shame you don't know the difference between speculation and reality. Another reality is the Tories couldn't see the real mess the country was in till they were in government. Labour knew full well the mess the country was in but failed to announce any way of combating it, hence why you think they're "blameless" when infact they're the ones you should be blaming for the coalitions cuts.

[Swastika]

Talking of lies, have you noticed in those articles it says could and not that the coalition will. For someone who's into their facts it's a shame you don't know the difference between speculation and reality. Another reality is the Tories couldn't see the real mess the country was in till they were in government. Labour knew full well the mess the country was in but failed to announce any way of combating it, hence why you think they're "blameless" when infact they're the ones you should be blaming for the coalitions cuts.

The fact there is speculation on the things that will be cut, which the Tories said they wouldn't, speaks for itself.
The speculation doesn't just come for nowhere, at one point or another a Conservative representative will have said they are planning or thinking about cutting the winter fuel allowance and the other benefits when Mr Cameron blatently said he and Tories would not.
Have i once said Labour are blameless in all of this? I do not know where you got that assumption from.

[Dean]

I can't vote in 2011 but in the next general election, which is in a few years, I'll be voting Labour.