Liverpool. No. Width.

[StefanWolves]

The 'cross' that you're on about was crap, it was only cause Cech misjudged it that you scored.

[.Shaun,,]

Either way it was a cross, the keeper mucked up, balls in the back of the net, all that matters.

As I said earlier in the thread Johnson & Kelly wingers, who's laughing now. Point was proved yesterday with how Daglish played the team.

[StefanWolves]

Either way it was a cross, the keeper mucked up, balls in the back of the net, all that matters.

As I said earlier in the thread Johnson & Kelly wingers, who's laughing now. Point was proved yesterday with how Daglish played the team.

Kelly and Johnson are defenders tho. Even playing 3 at the back they're still not technically wingers. Just attacking defenders (if you get me)

[.Shaun,,]

Yeah but either way they can play in the role, even if there not down on paper to.

[JackBuddy]

Stefan they were wingbacks. Milan, Inter, Chelsea etc get support and width from attacking full backs. Chelsea will revert that way if they intend on playing the 4312 formation again like Italian teams.

[StefanWolves]

Stefan they were wingbacks. Milan, Inter, Chelsea etc get support and width from attacking full backs. Chelsea will revert that way if they intend on playing the 4312 formation again like Italian teams.

Yes but still their main priority is defence not attack. Also your wrong with the 4312, unless they play two CDMs.

[JackBuddy]

Yes but still their main priority is defence not attack. Also your wrong with the 4312, unless they play two CDMs.

Mikel was the anchor and Essien stayed back more than Lampard did.