Porn

[Recursion]

I don't watch porn but it does entertain me to watch internet freedom warriors rally against 'government nannying' when they are the ones who support state nannying in regards to business, health and safety, smoking, alcohol etc.

Now I see how you turn every thread into an argument...

[dbgtz]

my sex ed never had explicit this is how you have sex talks. it was just how to stay safe, not how to do it. i genuinely think people use porn as general sex research, i guess talking to friends would work but ive never spoken to my friends about really explicit stuff like that...

One could argue that being taught how to stay safe could make them have sex sooner which is what government (and I guess parents) want to stop. I don't even see the point of sex ed, people survived fine without it and the fact that the internet is such a massive resource, it's almost pointless.

[Judas]

I don't watch porn but it does entertain me to watch internet freedom warriors rally against 'government nannying' when they are the ones who support state nannying in regards to business, health and safety, smoking, alcohol etc.

how are any of those things comparable to having a quickie before bedtime though?

[-:Undertaker:-]

Now I see how you turn every thread into an argument...

how are any of those things comparable to having a quickie before bedtime though?

I'm referring to the recent government plans to censor porn.

[Judas]

I'm referring to the recent government plans to censor porn.

I know. And I'm referring to the fact that them deciding whether people should be able to watch porn or not is not comparable to the decisions they need to make to do with the things you listed.

[-:Undertaker:-]

I know. And I'm referring to the fact that them deciding whether people should be able to watch porn or not is not comparable to the decisions they need to make to do with the things you listed.

Er well actually it is when they cry about 'freedom' as the basis of their opposition to it when it's clearly not.

I support liberty (freedom) and I object strongly to hypocrites using it as a basis for their argument when they don't really mean it, it tarnishes a good idea and demeans the word.

[Judas]

Er well actually it is when they cry about 'freedom' as the basis of their opposition to it when it's clearly not.

I support liberty (freedom) and I object strongly to hypocrites using it as a basis for their argument when they don't really mean it, it tarnishes a good idea and demeans the word.

I can't really see what the point you're trying to make is here, but I have a strong feeling you're just blowing something out of proportion as usual so don't worry

[-:Undertaker:-]

I can't really see what the point you're trying to make is here, but I have a strong feeling you're just blowing something out of proportion as usual so don't worry

*REMOVED*

Edited by Skynus (Forum Moderator): Please do not be rude to other members!

[Judas]

*REMOVED*

How pretentious of you, not that I'm surprised. Does it make you feel better about yourself by acting condescendingly to people you don't know over the internet for no good reason?

No one in this thread was even talking about freedom, or anything you said. You were just debating against some unnamed "internet warriors", so don't get upset when I'm questioning the relevance of your post.

[-:Undertaker:-]

How pretentious of you, not that I'm surprised. Does it make you feel better about yourself by acting condescendingly to people you don't know over the internet for no good reason?

No one in this thread was even talking about freedom, or anything you said. You were just debating against some unnamed "internet warriors", so don't get upset when I'm questioning the relevance of your post.

Ha! oh the irony. It was you who decided to turn personal and post a smart alec reply instead of posting (if you were genuinely interested and not just out to have a shot at myself) something along the lines of "I don't understand, could you elaborate?". I mean you're still doing it now, you've posted numerous times and everytime they've been personal with absolutely nothing on the topic at hand mentioned even once.

So no, I won't elaborate because you're not even remotely interested.