poor moderation/attention to reports

[Chris]

If you're going to be petty about it, fine.
@xxMATTGxx;

I'm not being petty about anything, that is the procedure and it always has been. Yes Martin probably saw Matts post but you can't just expect that he would have seen it by chance, he has to be contacted the proper way in order to understand why it was wrong otherwise the issue can't be rectified.

[The Don]

I'm not being petty about anything, that is the procedure and it always has been. Yes Martin probably saw Matts post but you can't just expect that he would have seen it by chance, he has to be contacted the proper way in order to understand why it was wrong otherwise the issue can't be rectified.

You and I both know that he saw Matt’s post, you’re literally using anything now to give your argument some credibility. It clearly was rectified as Matt explained why his edit was wrong in that thread so I fail to see your point?

Edit:
Anyway, as Matt previously said, this isn't the place for personal arguments so please stop posting to cause one.

[Samantha]

Moderators can't be wrong akeam pfttt

Anyway I'll he glad foa revamp when Brandon n Scotts back. Think its in dire need of change.

Can't edit.not meant sarcastically.

In re,ply to ilq w.e sometimes it takes 11+ hours for a report to he done. In this case the thread could have ade habbox members be scammed thus should have been dealt with quicker than leas severe ones.

[xxMATTGxx]

Moderators can't be wrong akeam pfttt

Anyway I'll he glad foa revamp when Brandon n Scotts back. Think its in dire need of change.

It will be, don't you worry.

If you're going to be petty about it, fine.
@xxMATTGxx;

I've removed the edit on the post. In terms of that post and the actual rule "A9. Leave moderating to the moderators" - This should also be another rule that needs to be looked at and also examples of what is breaking that rule and what isn't. This will also be sorted once Forum Management have returned back to normal duties. As there is a bit of confusion on what is breaking it and what isn't. I'll apologise on behalf of the whole department if you would like, it's not Martins or any other member of the departments fault.

Lmfao at this thread... From what I read it took 2 hours for a mod to do something. Wow! That's absolutely FINE. Don't like? **** the forum?

LOL!

This post made me laugh, kudos.

[Inseriousity.]

You and I both know that he saw Matt’s post, you’re literally using anything now to give your argument some credibility. It clearly was rectified as Matt explained why his edit was wrong in that thread so I fail to see your point?

That doesn't logically follow that Matt believes you're being targeted by said moderator though?

[Typoh]

A lot of this is off topic.. and just plain biccering...

[Samantha]

It will be, don't you worry.



I've removed the edit on the post. In terms of that post and the actual rule "A9. Leave moderating to the moderators" - This should also be another rule that needs to be looked at and also examples of what is breaking that rule and what isn't. This will also be sorted once Forum Management have returned back to normal duties. As there is a bit of confusion on what is breaking it and what ins't.




This post made me laugh, kudos.

I think really if someone goes this threads already posted then that's not moderating whereas someone going you broke rule x would be moderating. That's how I see it anyway.

[The Don]

That doesn't logically follow that Matt believes you're being targeted by said moderator though?

What? We aren't even discussing my complaint any more, this is an entirely different issue

[Chris]

You and I both know that he saw Matt’s post, you’re literally using anything now to give your argument some credibility. It clearly was rectified as Matt explained why his edit was wrong in that thread so I fail to see your point?

Edit:
Anyway, as Matt previously said, this isn't the place for personal arguments so please stop posting to cause one.

Sigh. Nothing in my posts were personal to you, you could be anyone on the forum and I would still say exactly the same thing.

Anyway, you have your answer now don't you so I hope this will be the end of it all as I'm tired of seeing moderators taking all the blame. Lets leave your other issue in the complaints forum where it should be and end the discussion about that here. I'm sure Martin will send you an apology, although if he doesn't I wouldn't be at all surprised.

Edit:

I'll apologise on behalf of the whole department if you would like, it's not Martins or any other member of the departments fault.

Didn't see that

[The Don]

Sigh. Nothing in my posts were personal to you, you could be anyone on the forum and I would still say exactly the same thing.

Anyway, you have your answer now don't you so I hope this will be the end of it all as I'm tired of seeing moderators taking all the blame. Lets leave your other issue in the complaints forum where it should be and end the discussion about that here. I'm sure Martin will send you an apology, although if he doesn't I wouldn't be at all surprised.

Omg, it’s like I say A and you interpret it as B, you are discussing an issue with me which is specifically about another individual, If that isn’t personal, I don’t know what is.

I never wanted to have an argument in the first place, it isn’t my fault moderation is so dire at the moment nor is it my fault that the cavalry comes flocking in when something slightly critical is posted in a feedback thread. I really couldn’t care less if Martin Apologised to me, we all know he was wrong and I’ve been cleared which is all that matters. You decided to turn this thread to about Martin with your response to my post (which left out any names and was blunt about the matter)