dogs and muzzles

[Empired]

Chances of that happening though to most people???????? Rare.

Changes of dogs biting most people???????? Equally rare.

Sure, a few dogs are dangerous, but so are cars and trains, but we have them everywhere? Should we muzzle a train?

[Richie]

I just did, cba speaking about it again.

[Catchy]

I just did, cba speaking about it again.

No need to get pissy with me lmao

[Red]

Lol? So you think I am wrong for valuing peoples safety over an animal wearing a muzzle. Quite surprised you think this, yet you sit and willingly support animals being murdered for your consumption of meat.
When is a dog classed as vicious? When it finally attacks someone? Don't really think they should be waiting for people to get hurt before it can finally have a muzzle placed on it. It is in place for those dogs since majority of attacks were by them. As for jack russels or other small dogs, lets hope the owners are wise enough to muzzle it too if it is viscious.

[Richie]

I'm not lol.. I just don't want to chat about it as it isn't relevant sheesh

[Catchy]

You got rid of it because it was too vicious I am guessing now you're sat here defending all dogs saying oh they're fineeeeeeee... LMAO what a JOKE.

Oh and someone please tell me what the hell is so nice and friendly about this

[Kyle]

People are held responsible for their pets' actions, sure, but the government are the ones held accountable if somebody has a lapse in judgement, their dog kills 15 infants and they play the "but there's no law against it!" card. This is why laws are made. A few dogs weren't picked at random from a hat and forced to wear muzzles... they have to because they are bred as dangerous dogs and, no matter how they are trained, that innate prey drive and aggression will still be there.

There are various ways in which human crime is reduced. The idea of attatching some sort of wireless monitor to everybody of a certain age is simply ludicrous - not to mention impractical! Asking owners to muzzle a dog deemed dangerous whilst in public is not.

Pets can be conditioned to perform tricks on their owner's request. They can't realistically be taught what is right and what is wrong in the eyes of the law and not every owner will teach their pet in the same way, so the only sufficient conclusion really is to avoid it happening alltogether by making people muzzle their dogs!

Normally it wouldn't be right to single out a particular group (of dogs) to apply a law to but in this case, where this type of dog has been proven to be vicious, the term "better safe than sorry" pretty much sums things up.

If a human is seen as a danger to himself or others then in many cases there are precautions taken to ensure safety all round. In mental hospitals, for example, if a patient is a threat then they are restrained. If a dog is seen as a threat, it should be muzzled. Simple.

[Empired]

It's not just dogs who aren't nice and friendly. Everyone has the power to be dangerous if they really want to be.

[Richie]

Yeah Jacob I got rid of my dog because he was extremely vicious.

[Kyle]

It's not just dogs who aren't nice and friendly. Everyone has the power to be dangerous if they really want to be.

People have a choice to deviate from what laws says is right, dogs don't.