[Vote] Pictures of yourself in avatars & signatures

[Kardan]

Other members photos wouldn't be allowed in your avatar or signature at all.

Not even with permission?

[Chris]

Not even with permission?

Perhaps with proof of permission it would be allowed but a lot of people just claim they have permission without actually having it.

[Shar]

Whatever floats your boat.

[Chippiewill]

Everyone on here is ugly as **** so I voted no.

[Special]

yes, you're allowed to post pictures of yourself in threads so why not avatars?

[Chippiewill]

yes, you're allowed to post pictures of yourself in threads so why not avatars?

It's easier to avoid PAPOY than it is to avoid people's avatars.

[LiquidLuck.]

I don't mind either way

[Drunq]

I think It's a good idea, maybe not in your signature tho.... I voted the top one but I meant just in ur profile avatar of course. I know we can restrict our profiles to private but init we should be allowed to do it on posts of our own or have something in place......

[Emz]

Oh. I didn't even know ur not supposed to use a picture of yourself lol. I swear I didn't know the picture rules til now! Does this mean I have to change my avatar asap? :S

[nvrspk4]

Just for reference, I think the reason for this was based on sierk having a very strong opinion on this. As the years went on people realized that having faces plastered all over the place would incite bullying and generally be not that pleasant, and they didn't want it enough to overcome the negatives. Just because nobody could seem to remember why. Certainly possible that opinions changed and I dunno that sierk cares anymore