
Wow, this whole thread is lame.
First point: you can't really compare PS3 and 360 graphics. The 360 has been out a lot longer and so developers have a lot more experience with the console, therefore games are bound to look a lot better. Also a lot of PS3 games right now are ports of 360 versions and so their graphics do not necessarily represent the power of the machine. If you compare 360 launch titles to 360 launch titles, there's clear evidence that the PS3 games look much better. You could argue in that instance that PS3 launch titles are bound to look better given the launch delays.
It's a vicious cycle of crappy arguments.
Ultimately in the long run the PS3 has more raw processing power and is going to be able to produce better graphics. However the triple-cored 360 is going to mean it can give developers scope to use more advanced A.I.
Second point: great graphics doesn't mean a great game (or if you like, games machine). Okami is probably better-looking than anything "next gen" and it's on the PS2. It has a wonderful, captivating art style that oozes beauty from every crevasse.
Last edited by Bear-Max; 17-06-2007 at 06:03 PM.
The only decent post in this thread. I'm not a playstation fanboy, but if you take a game released exclusively on the ps3 and a game released exclusively on the xbox 360 (Or just one which hasn't been ported) you will see that the graphics on the ps3 are unrivaled by the 360.Wow, this whole thread is lame.
First point: you can't really compare PS3 and 360 graphics. The 360 has been out a lot longer and so developers have a lot more experience with the console, therefore games are bound to look a lot better. Also a lot of PS3 games right now are ports of 360 versions and so their graphics do not necessarily represent the power of the machine. If you compare 360 launch titles to 360 launch titles, there's clear evidence that the PS3 games look much better. You could argue in that instance that PS3 launch titles are bound to look better given the launch delays.
It's a vicious cycle of crappy arguments.
Ultimately in the long run the PS3 has more raw processing power and is going to be able to produce better graphics. However the triple-cored 360 is going to mean it can give developers scope to use more advanced A.I.
Second point: great graphics doesn't mean a great game (or if you like, games machine). Okami is probably better-looking than anything "next gen" and it's on the PS2. It has a wonderful, captivating art style that oozes beauty from every crevasse.
Thank you
You're right, although "unrivalled" might be the wrong word. The difference will become evident, but as of yet it isn't--Gears of War is probably still the best looking console game ever (Motorstorm does look good, but I still think it's not as good as Gears). The graphics gap isn't really that huge either, the PS3 has an edge over the 360 by about the same amount that the Xbox had over the PS2.
Oh, and in my last post I meant "If you compare 360 launch titles to PS3 launch titles", not "360 launch titles to 360 launch titles"![]()
OMG DA 360 PWNS U ALL XO
I agree with what that dude said in that big post :]
PS3 looks liek a modern bread bin end off.
and the graphics look way better in them pictures for the 360 your obv blind if you carnt see it.
The PS3 colours in the pics look all faded and sketchy.
vise verca again![]()
Ex-janitor. Might pop in from time to time, otherwise you can grab all my information from http://jamesy.me.uk/
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!