Executions - Right or wrong? - [Closes 19/02/08]

[KnuxIBF]

Wrong:

a) If they murder, and we kill them, we're nothing better than they are.
b) Verdicts can be wrong, so if we kill them and find them innocent, we're in a bit of trouble. The Government will then be sued millions of pounds for the trouble, and taxes will rise.

[CrazyColaist]

isnt there 2 types of exucition anyway?


its right
if a person kills loads of other people with solid proof there for i would kill them myself=]

[StripedTiger]

An eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind.

[Throne Sofa]

Completely wrong. Executing someone is simply wrong, what are they going to acheive out of it? Is it justice to execute someone who has killed others? What will they acheive by Executing someone? I don't know.
Despite all the wrong, they should be at allowed at least the most basic human rights. Two wrongs do not make a right.

[vito201-:D]

Wrong.

Just for the fact that it is possible to make human error and kill an innocent person.

If you actually look at the American death-sentences that have been changed while they were on death row or even when it's too late because new evidence is bought forward...

...it does happen not too often but just enough to make it not worth it imo.

[<3]

Wrong. Murder is seen as the most horrific crime these days... and by executing somebody, you become a murderer also.

That's my view anyway.

[SugarBabyRach]

It depends on all the circumstances we have to consider. If a man had killed another human or had ruined someones life by sexualy assaulting them I would guess they kinda deserved it, but if the law kills a man for killing another man, doesnt that make the law just as bad as they were?