Child Pornography

[Galaxay]

You're lucky

[JackHb]

I am too lazy to read the whole thread, but if it is child pornography (The stuff peadophiles look at) people are posting then surely more than a ban should be done too them after all child pornography is a criminal offence.

[--ss--]

The image that was posted doesn't even look like childporn , it does looked like normal pornographic picture taken by an amateur overweight 30 year old? Quite creepy.
Normal porn isn't even meant to be posted on the forum anyway , it doesn't seem that was emphasized enough.

[Galaxay]

LOL SHANEE you loved it YOU GOT PELFED.

[Leetzgirl]

The image that was posted doesn't even look like childporn , it does looked like normal pornographic picture taken by an amateur overweight 30 year old? Quite creepy.
Normal porn isn't even meant to be posted on the forum anyway , it doesn't seem that was emphasized enough.

Lol, more like a granny rofl

[leah]

DAVID GOT PELFED TOO

[nvrspk4]

To clarify, it was sparked by the issue at hand yes but after googling it to get some confirmation, I couldn't find a specific age for the UK child porn laws (it was late so I didn't look that hard.) Therefore, I was making sure, just in case the age for child porn was the same as the age for legal intercourse in Britain. It appears, however, that I was mistaken, and that announcement was unecessary I guess. My bad But it serves as a reminder. But the reason it was posted was I wasn't sure if those in the 16-18 range were classified as child porn in England and I wanted to reinforce the understanding of the harsh measures taken with those who spread it (someone spreading porn would be permed, someone spreading child porn is most probably autobanned.)

I serouisly find this stupid as someone got perm'ed banned while the person who started it got a less harsher term.

If you know who started it PM us, if we didn't perm them its because we didn't know.

Technically a 16 year old girl is legally allowed to circulate topless pictures if they have parental consent under modelling laws still, this isn't allowed on forum anyway so void point, just thought I'd let anyone who's inteRested in Young girls hAve the iNformation.

Right that wouldn't be allowed.

It's pornography... No form of pornography is allowed, which is why the announcement seems pointless, because you're just announcing 2 things people are fully aware of, pornography and bullying, which are already rules and people should know by now that both aren't allowed. And it's 18 for pornography here, and to be in pictures of pornography you also have to be 18. It'll be like me announcing that chocolate ice-cream may contain traces of chocolate, or bags of peanuts may contain traces of nuts

The rule of bullying seems to apply here too, which also adds to why I think the announcement was pointless, to others it would appear to be too. Just spurred for no reason.

No, pornography would be a permanent ban, child pornography is dealt with as a more serious issue, and the point was to clarify that 16-18 would be dealt with as child porn, but that seems to be a moot point as it is considered that in Britain, so YES it was pretty pointless, because I was confused.

This thread is closed because it is turning into bullying.