Here's some feedback...

[Slowpoke]

I swear I was not being sarcastic. :S

I don't think he was being sarcastic. :S

Still sure?

I'm starting to sympathize with MAD.

[JackBuddy]

As far as I am aware, saracasm isn't a bannable offence. So there's no need for the sympathy.

[Slowpoke]

As far as I am aware, saracasm isn't a bannable offence. So there's no need for the sympathy.

No, but it's a silly attitude, especially when its directed at someone who is trying to help you. And for the record, no-where did I state that it was a bannable offence. A negative attitude is, however and replying to a helpful post like he did falls under that category. But since this thread has nothing at all to do with his ban -

Prefixes are a good addition but do look quite tacky, it's still on trial with Habbox though so it most likely see some changes.

[JackBuddy]

No, but it's a silly attitude, especially when its directed at someone who is trying to help you. And for the record, no-where did I state that it was a bannable offence. A negative attitude is, however and replying to a helpful post like he did falls under that category.

Well it was when you thought he was being sarcastic your views suddenly changed, and you thought he should be banned. Hell, I'm sure I could look through your posts and find something negative.

rule a17 or whatever it is says:

A17. Do not be a negative factor on the forum - We welcome constructive criticism but we also strive to maintain a positive environment. Administrators, as always, will have the final say on whether a member is constantly being negative on the forums.

let's leave this one to the admins.

[GommeInc]

No, but it's a silly attitude, especially when its directed at someone who is trying to help you. And for the record, no-where did I state that it was a bannable offence. A negative attitude is, however and replying to a helpful post like he did falls under that category. But since this thread has nothing at all to do with his ban -

Prefixes are a good addition but do look quite tacky, it's still on trial with Habbox though so it most likely see some changes.

Surely if someone is helping you, such action would of already been done? I don't see much help coming from his side And replying to posts falls under negativity? Since when? The whole point of discussing something with some is to have a discussion, not a quick reply and then leave it, which is where the idea that management "push things under the carpet" comes from, because they should be replying to threads more frequently, not a quick reply and do action behind the scenes. That's useless in the eyes of members...

Well it was when you thought he was being sarcastic your views suddenly changed, and you thought he should be banned. Hell, I'm sure I could look through your posts and find something negative.

Oh that's easy, he's suggesting someone should be banned. That's negativity, and he's not very useful considering it's a feedback forum and he happens to be a forum moderator, which stereotypically are meant to be helpful to members.

[Slowpoke]

Well it was when you thought he was being sarcastic your views suddenly changed, and you thought he should be banned. Hell, I'm sure I could look through your posts and find something negative.

I've never said that so stop trying to put words into my mouth.

And you probably could, but thats the difference between a negative post here and there and a constant negative attitude and if you read my first post about his ban, you'll see that I disagree with his ban but it's not my place to comment because I don't have a say in the matter.

All you can do is hope MAD will have a change of heart because as far as I know, the only people who can go over his head when it comes to overruling his decisions are sierk and Jin.

let's leave this one to the admins.

It's as if you completely dismissed my earlier posts.

[JackBuddy]

I've never said that so stop trying to put words into my mouth.

And you probably could, but thats the difference between a negative post here and there and a constant negative attitude and if you read my first post about his ban, you'll see that I disagree with his ban but it's not my place to comment because I don't have a say in the matter.

Well what did you mean by sympathising with MAD then? I don't want to start arguments, or even be negative. But you can't decide on what post is negative, as I said earlier... it is up to admins.

[Neversoft]

Still sure?

I'm starting to sympathize with MAD.

Oh my... I was not being sarcastic! I bolded my post to put that point across! =/ You were very polite and on my side, why would I be sarcastic? I really do apologise if my post came across the wrong way.

Your ban is pointless, most bans are anyway. Hopefully you'll get your account back, you're an important member

Thanks.

[Slowpoke]

Once again:

All you can do is hope MAD will have a change of heart because as far as I know, the only people who can go over his head when it comes to overruling his decisions are sierk and Jin.

But you can't decide on what post is negative, as I said earlier... it is up to admins.

I've already said that..

[JackBuddy]

I've already said that..

I was referring to this post from you:

A negative attitude is, however and replying to a helpful post like he did falls under that category.

I'm going to stay out of this argument, because of the two of us I am more likely to follow Neversoft and Naughtynemo's path.