Ah, yes and what about the 139 british soldiers against 4,000-5,000 zulus.Originally Posted by Soil
PMSL. Thats all I have to say
India vs England on their own, India will win.
India had 500 soldiers once against like 2000 or more Pakistani soldiers and we beat them. And India has way more soldiers etc than UK. By 2040, India and China are predicted to be the most powerful countries, not USA etc
Results 61 to 65 of 65
Thread: Strongest Army in the world?
-
.
-
18-11-2008, 05:22 PM #62
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Posts
- 24,817
- Tokens
- 63,679
- Habbo
- FlyingJesus
To be fair we got utter mugged round one, then we brought cannons lol Originally Posted by Geraint
-
Actually, only guns were used in Rourke's drift. Originally Posted by FlyingJesus
The battle before, in which the British got batted, cannons were used by the Brits and they still lost, somehow. That battle of Isandlwana had 20,000 zulus and 8,000 British. From there the 4,000-5,000 zulus moved on to Rourke's Drift..
-
Wales, blatently
Light thinks it travels faster than anything but it is wrong. No matter how fast light travels, it finds the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it. - Terry Pratchett
-
The Xbox 360 Call of Duty: World at War Imperial Army.
That's why we seize the moment, try to freeze it and own it, squeeze it and hold it cause we consider these minutes golden.
Reply With Quote
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts