Please do not...offend... other users

[The Don]

It would be a fair point if that were your aim, really you should have made a thread in this forum saying why you think it's unfair rather than airing you dirty laundry here because you were to inpatient to wait for the PM to arrive.

Posting in the complaints section renders the point of feedback useless... Here everyone can discuss the situation whereas the complaints section limits those who can view the thread.

[Zelda]

It would be a fair point if that were your aim, really you should have made a thread in this forum saying why you think it's unfair rather than airing you dirty laundry here because you were to inpatient to wait for the PM to arrive.

Also some of the things you're saying would be better suited to:
http://www.habboxforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1331

2 points, firstly if he did that I would be less likely to find out what really was said, and also by doing this even if that ain't his aim I can strive personally for it as that is my aim.

[The Don]

Sorry but that's just nitpicking for a bad argument. Moderators shouldn't have to be lawyers and close up the loopholes behind them.

No, moderators should use their initiative rather than issuing pointless/incorrect warnings.

[Samantha]

IT'S A PITY WHEN THE MOD DOESN'T READ THE WHOLE THREAD SO DOESN'T REMOVE THE 'OFFENSIVE' PART IN THE QUOTE BELOW THE ORIGINAL POST OF IT! SAD DAY, SAD DAY.

That can be how Jan saw it :rolleyes:

[Zuth]

There was no point in removing it.

It feels like you are trying to take over the empty position of outspoken and often incorrect moderator which Chris left behind.

I think Matt needs to hire more capable mods if they can't grasp a simple point after 6 pages.

Thats your opinion and you're entitled to it, I don't agree.
Trying to take over the SMOD position? I'm doing my job?
Matt is not the forum manager.

[Inseriousity.]

Being offended is subjective, moderation discretion is subjective. I do not like the idea that something has to be direct for it to constitute being offensive because it is often those indirect remarks that are, in my opinion, more offensive. Perhaps moderators should wait until someone complains about the material before acting on it but I think it's wrong to suggest that your post was fine because it was only implying something nasty rather than saying it outright.

[Zuth]

IT'S A PITY WHEN THE MOD DOESN'T READ THE WHOLE THREAD SO DOESN'T REMOVE THE 'OFFENSIVE' PART IN THE QUOTE BELOW THE ORIGINAL POST OF IT! SAD DAY, SAD DAY.

What would the point of that be when people can still read it?

[Zelda]

Sorry but that's just nitpicking for a bad argument. Moderators shouldn't have to be lawyers and close up the loopholes behind them.

Tbh your just trying to win a nonwinabble arguement, considering both sides of the not rude but warned post agree with each other ...

[Chippiewill]

No, moderators should use their initiative rather than issuing pointless/incorrect warnings.

If you have a problem with the warning then ask for it to be removed IN THE CORRECT FORUM. Feedback isn't the place for your personal issues with moderators and how they've screwed up on occasion. Errors are probable and there's a system to handle them. use it.

IT'S A PITY WHEN THE MOD DOESN'T READ THE WHOLE THREAD SO DOESN'T REMOVE THE 'OFFENSIVE' PART IN THE QUOTE BELOW THE ORIGINAL POST OF IT! SAD DAY, SAD DAY.

Report button is there for a reason

2 points, firstly if he did that I would be less likely to find out what really was said, and also by doing this even if that ain't his aim I can strive personally for it as that is my aim.

return please when you grammar has. Can't read what you're saying.

[Zelda]

What would the point of that be when people can still read it?

That whoever was rude gets warned and the person it was directed to sees the post still so they don't start further arguements