Habbox History

[Samantha]

https://habbox.com/#!/HallOfFame

Updated it, work in progress, I don't mind if you agree or disagree with any - please tell me. Also when I wrote this I couldn't really think of much more to say about the final few (as I missed the first five years of Habbox) ok ty.

[Grig]

https://habbox.com/#!/HallOfFame

Updated it, work in progress, I don't mind if you agree or disagree with any - please tell me. Also when I wrote this I couldn't really think of much more to say about the final few (as I missed the first five years of Habbox) ok ty.

Wait why is Jess not there?! But people like Alkaz, Danube and Undertaker are. They never did anything special, no offence.

I think general management should manage it as it's too contentious. I could go back as a content designer, ask for that page and add people who I think should be there. It simply isn't right.
@xxMATTGxx;

[David]

Wait why is Jess not there?! But people like Alkaz, Danube and Undertaker are. They never did anything special, no offence.

I think general management should manage it as it's too contentious. I could go back as a content designer, ask for that page and add people who I think should be there. It simply isn't right.
@xxMATTGxx;

you could apply that reason to any page, dont be silly. that's what content writers are for

[Alex3213]

Wait why is Jess not there?! But people like Alkaz, Danube and Undertaker are. They never did anything special, no offence.

I think general management should manage it as it's too contentious. I could go back as a content designer, ask for that page and add people who I think should be there. It simply isn't right.
@xxMATTGxx;

I am in agreement, Alkaz and Danube should not be there. Sorry!

...and infact I am in agreement with that too, I would prefer if a content designer did not take hold of the page, as I don't think it's fair. I remember I was meant to manage the page when I was a content designer and within a couple of days I thought "hang on, I shouldn't be doing this" as it shouldn't really be that department's responsibility, I don't think.

However notice I did not talk about GM there because I think it really should be the forum's decision as a group as opposed to a few people giving their ideas. I know that is trying to be the case but sometimes I think that own opinions can get in the way.

[Grig]

you could apply that reason to any page, dont be silly. that's what content writers are for

Not really. Can't apply that to departments or Habbo. Don't see any logic in this argument.

[David]

Not really. Can't apply that to departments or Habbo. Don't see any logic in this argument.

no? if I managed those pages I couldn't change manager dates and add people who shouldn't be there? this simply isn't right, GM should be the only ones changing those pages.

[Grig]

no? if I managed those pages I couldn't change manager dates and add people who shouldn't be there? this simply isn't right, GM should be the only ones changing those pages.

Oh God...

You cannot deceive such pages because managers were there and you would get in major trouble, but you can easily use your discretion for the HOF.

[FlyingJesus]

Who the hell is Spectate

[Chippiewill]

I think general management should manage it as it's too contentious.

The page is going to be written subjectively regardless of who manages it, Matt is no more qualified to write it than Samanfa is and only marginally more qualified to determine who should be on it.

Matt has more important things to do than write a list which people will have issues with regardless.

[Grig]

The page is going to be written subjectively regardless of who manages it, Matt is no more qualified to write it than Samanfa is and only marginally more qualified to determine who should be on it.

Matt has more important things to do than write a list which people will have issues with regardless.

Then get a consensus like Alex said. Why does she get to determine the best of the best at Habbox?