HABBOX DOWNTIME

[Recursion]

I do it when I can be bothered, the fact is my day job is computers and I don't feel like sitting at them when I get home, I'd rather hang out being lazy by that time.

It's very difficult to earn Jin's trust, and the fact is me and Matt are the only ones around here who he'll trust with most of the passwords etc etc. I don't take interest in Habbox it self anymore, but I do take interest in trying to keep the community.

[Reality]

To be honest guys be grateful you've got a forum you've got some people that care and fit it around their personal lives.
I bet the techs have a lot more to do on the forum than most probably fix this right now!
Eg v7 (hopefully)
They could close Habbox then what would you do? Panic because you don't have social life's? That's unfortunate deal with it!
( not that Habbox will close soonish)

[Samantha]

This is just stupid. He has a life and he's allowed to voice his opinion that it's voluntary. Perhaps you should PM Jin and ask him why he isn't online 24/7 to do the server work along with Tom?

It's not stupid in the slightest, I never said he wasn't allowed to voice his opinions or not have a life, but it's been a problem for a while now and if say it was a normal department and something was expected to be done then it would be done or we'd face being dismissed, yet if someone like Tom - could be others too, not really sure then they're not. Is that because they need the site coders a lot more to fix or finish v7 or something, I don't have admin access and nor do many, but you have to look at it from other points of view too and consider, like I said, if he was a normal, inactive member of staff he would be fired surely? There's a difference between admin and normal staff of course, but at the end of the day there are job roles however voluntary they are.

I know it's about a lot of trust, but if someone doesn't enjoy Habbox or anything aren't they more likely to have a spur of the moment thing and do whatever they want to Habbox? I am no way suggesting Tom would do that of course as you said the trust is there, but there's always that possibility. Again it's down to trust, but he voiced his opinions and I voiced mine, and I doubt I'm the only one who thinks it.

---------- Post added 25-05-2013 at 11:05 AM ----------

To be honest guys be grateful you've got a forum you've got some people that care and fit it around their personal lives.
I bet the techs have a lot more to do on the forum than most probably fix this right now!
Eg v7 (hopefully)
They could close Habbox then what would you do? Panic because you don't have social life's? That's unfortunate deal with it!
( not that Habbox will close soonish)

Actually, I do have this thing called a life too, something that might be lacking here, but I was proving a point - if I did no work in a department, then I'd be dismissed, if Tom didn't then he wouldn't/couldn't, he's cleared it up that he can do it when he can be bothered so that's fine, at the end of the day that's all you can and should ask for from everyone as Tom said it's voluntary, both Toms that is.

[Reality]

Wasn't targeting the comment at just you so calm down! Plus I clearly stated that in my first post thanks for the repeat.

It's not stupid in the slightest, I never said he wasn't allowed to voice his opinions or not have a life, but it's been a problem for a while now and if say it was a normal department and something was expected to be done then it would be done or we'd face being dismissed, yet if someone like Tom - could be others too, not really sure then they're not. Is that because they need the site coders a lot more to fix or finish v7 or something, I don't have admin access and nor do many, but you have to look at it from other points of view too and consider, like I said, if he was a normal, inactive member of staff he would be fired surely? There's a difference between admin and normal staff of course, but at the end of the day there are job roles however voluntary they are.

I know it's about a lot of trust, but if someone doesn't enjoy Habbox or anything aren't they more likely to have a spur of the moment thing and do whatever they want to Habbox? I am no way suggesting Tom would do that of course as you said the trust is there, but there's always that possibility. Again it's down to trust, but he voiced his opinions and I voiced mine, and I doubt I'm the only one who thinks it.

---------- Post added 25-05-2013 at 11:05 AM ----------



Actually, I do have this thing called a life too, something that might be lacking here, but I was proving a point - if I did no work in a department, then I'd be dismissed, if Tom didn't then he wouldn't/couldn't, he's cleared it up that he can do it when he can be bothered so that's fine, at the end of the day that's all you can and should ask for from everyone as Tom said it's voluntary, both Toms that is.

[David]

( not that Habbox will close soonish)

debatable, personally think habbox is on borrowed time

[Reality]

debatable, personally think habbox is on borrowed time

My thoughts exactly

[Mr-Trainor]

if I did no work in a department, then I'd be dismissed, if Tom didn't then he wouldn't/couldn't, he's cleared it up that he can do it when he can be bothered so that's fine, at the end of the day that's all you can and should ask for from everyone as Tom said it's voluntary, both Toms that is.

Couldn't agree more with this.

[Chippiewill]

It's not stupid in the slightest, I never said he wasn't allowed to voice his opinions or not have a life, but it's been a problem for a while now and if say it was a normal department and something was expected to be done then it would be done or we'd face being dismissed, yet if someone like Tom - could be others too, not really sure then they're not. Is that because they need the site coders a lot more to fix or finish v7 or something, I don't have admin access and nor do many, but you have to look at it from other points of view too and consider, like I said, if he was a normal, inactive member of staff he would be fired surely? There's a difference between admin and normal staff of course, but at the end of the day there are job roles however voluntary they are.

The difference is that normal staff are easily replaced. Admins are not.

[Mr-Trainor]

The difference is that normal staff are easily replaced. Admins are not.

But too often they get away with breaking the rules .

[Chippiewill]

But too often they get away with breaking the rules .

Your statement is ambiguous. To whom are you referring.