I'm a Habbo... Feedback

[Phil]

Yeah we already established days ago you were stupid to take both poll results into consideration rather than the actual final poll as you screwed it up initially, so I'm aware she would have been out from your initial poor judgment

What I'm speaking about now is your second poor judgment saying you'd ignore a vote because one of the people voted them self, which was in no way against the rules and should have no influence over who would have been evicted. If Ms.Aqua didn't vote herself then that's her choice for not doing so and voting another, or not being active enough or whatever other reason she didn't vote herself. If you didn't want people voting for them self then you should have indicated that in the rules, not just randomly pull it out and use it in an eviction poll tbh.

No, we established it was your opinion I was stupid actually. Why are you so angry? lol

So you think that it would be fairer to knock them both out when one clearly got less public votes?

[Kardan]

Yeah, she would have beaten Jen if she had voted for herself? Jen got 4 votes from the public and Rosy got 5. Jen voted for herself so it was 5-5. I'm confused and I think I'm missing your point

Because a lot of people voted in both polls and it'll be confusing to go through the numbers and stuff. Really not much of a difference was made

But you've already checked through the polls and accounted for double voting, that's what you said you would do in your poll at least (and that was why I didn't vote for Liva again in the 2nd poll) - so you should already have that information?

And what me and @scottish; are saying - is that the poll result was 5-5. It was a tie. Rosy didn't vote for anyone, that's it. She didn't vote for herself, so the score wasn't 6-5. The only reason Jen should have been evicted is the result from both polls and nothing to do with Rosy not voting for herself.

I'm feeling dodgy about this poll I must say, and I reckon you should reveal who voted who for this eviction, if only for buttons and Rosy, so we can check that the double voting didn't make a difference.

- - - Updated - - -

No, we established it was your opinion I was stupid actually. Why are you so angry? lol

So you think that it would be fairer to knock them both out when one clearly got less public votes?

Looks equal to me.

[scottish]

No, we established it was your opinion I was stupid actually. Why are you so angry? lol

So you think that it would be fairer to knock them both out when one clearly got less public votes?

I'm not angry lol

And yes, or have some tie breaker to decide which one goes if you didn't want to get rid of both of them.

[Phil]

But you've already checked through the polls and accounted for double voting, that's what you said you would do in your poll at least (and that was why I didn't vote for Liva again in the 2nd poll) - so you should already have that information?

I have it on a piece of paper somewhere, I didn't save the information, just put it straight into that eviction thread

And what me and @scottish; are saying - is that the poll result was 5-5. It was a tie. Rosy didn't vote for anyone, that's it. She didn't vote for herself, so the score wasn't 6-5. The only reason Jen should have been evicted is the result from both polls and nothing to do with Rosy not voting for herself.

I'm not angry lol

And yes, or have some tie breaker to decide which one goes if you didn't want to get rid of both of them.

We're arguing over a 'what if' here so it doesn't really matter Scott, if it happened that Jen was the one who got like 7 votes in the first poll and then 3/4 in the second one and we disregarded the first poll and Jen get evicted, you'd think it's unfair then. Just for clarification if it ever did end in a tie break I did have a breaker prepared

[Kardan]

I have it on a piece of paper somewhere, I didn't save the information, just put it straight into that eviction thread





We're arguing over a 'what if' here so it doesn't really matter Scott, if it happened that Jen was the one who got like 7 votes in the first poll and then 3/4 in the second one and we disregarded the first poll and Jen get evicted, you'd think it's unfair then. Just for clarification if it ever did end in a tie break I did have a breaker prepared

What was the tie breaker?
And can we see the results for the first poll?

[scottish]

No I wouldn't, you screwed up the first vote and the second poll results should have stuck, whether it was Jen or not.

Then why not say there's a tie breaker and not say you'd change the poll results to 5-4 to Ms.Aqua

[Phil]

What was the tie breaker?
And can we see the results for the first poll?

Basically a memory game from things that happened/was said in each camp and whoever got the most right would have won.
Sure one sec

[Kardan]

Basically a memory game from things that happened/was said in each camp and whoever got the most right would have won.
Sure one sec

Oh, I was expecting another vote with just the two of them.

[The Don]

Yeah, she would have beaten Jen if she had voted for herself? Jen got 4 votes from the public and Rosy got 5. Jen voted for herself so it was 5-5. I'm confused and I think I'm missing your point

Because a lot of people voted in both polls and it'll be confusing to go through the numbers and stuff. Really not much of a difference was made

It's rosy's fault for not voting for herself, you basically cheated by taking away one of the votes for jen.

edit: oh wait, so the votes from that poll didn't even matter? why are we complaining then?

[Phil]

What was the tie breaker?
And can we see the results for the first poll?