Rule Change Feedback

[lawrawrrr]

I do not mind that Trading has been merged but...



Would be easier for all if B> or S> was put in the prefixes automatically. Yes this would lead to double the amount of Prefixes but makes Mods life easier.

We can't have two sets of prefixes, I guess we could do [LTD] B> and [LTD] S> but it's common practice on Habbo trading forums to put the B and S in anyway so most people will probably do that anyway?

[Matt]

If too many people are forgetting the B>, S> etc in their thread titles then that definitely is a possibility. I seem to recall that idea was brought up in discussions between myself and Laura or I did think about using it when we originally spoke about adding prefixes in that Forum - but we left it out.

[abc]

We can't have two sets of prefixes, I guess we could do [LTD] B> and [LTD] S> but it's common practice on Habbo trading forums to put the B and S in anyway so most people will probably do that anyway?

I know you cannot have two sets of prefixes without another MOD. My post meant have double the number of prefixes like Matts post above.

[Kyle]

I think manually entering B> S> is fine

[Samantha]

I don't mind it, it will definitely make it easier with members not knowing where to put the thread, and it's easier for a mod to change a prefix to the correct one or adding the B> or S> in.

The one thing I would change is the prefixes, with it all being in one forum you have no need for the 'categorised rare' bit as you don't use 'normal rares' just rares which is ambiguous due to most rares aside from classical ones being categorised now. So I think 'LTD', 'Super', 'Rare' and 'Norm' (and Misc) would be better.

Sent from my C5303 using Tapatalk

[lawrawrrr]

I don't mind it, it will definitely make it easier with members not knowing where to put the thread, and it's easier for a mod to change a prefix to the correct one or adding the B> or S> in.

The one thing I would change is the prefixes, with it all being in one forum you have no need for the 'categorised rare' bit as you don't use 'normal rares' just rares which is ambiguous due to most rares aside from classical ones being categorised now. So I think 'LTD', 'Super', 'Rare' and 'Norm' (and Misc) would be better.

Sent from my C5303 using Tapatalk

I THOUGHT THIS TOO but I have no idea what categorised rare even MEANT and there's no separate star on hx.com anyway?

[Kyle]

I think [Bulk] [Assorted] [Rare] [Super] [Ltd] would be good

honestly who comes on to sell a norm

[Samantha]

I THOUGHT THIS TOO but I have no idea what categorised rare even MEANT and there's no separate star on hx.com anyway?

A categorised rare means it was released in a specific range - so a Mushroom Wall would fit in with the Fungi or Flower Power category (hence the long list of categories on rare values/the Mushroom Wall has been released in both categories). A 'normal' rare is something like a Bronze Elephant, although it could fit into Elephant Statues it's also an established rare in its own right.



Sent from my C5303 using Tapatalk

[Matt]

I think [Bulk] [Assorted] [Rare] [Super] [Ltd] would be good

honestly who comes on to sell a norm

These prefixes would make a lot more sense compared to what we have now (and the fact they're pretty self explanatory also helps).

[lawrawrrr]

These prefixes would make a lot more sense compared to what we have now (and the fact they're pretty self explanatory also helps).

I agree actually, this does make more sense! Shoot me a message if you want me to update them later if you don't have time

Edit: actually do you not think norm is a thing? Cos sometimes norms can increase quite a lot in value / people selling a lot of them might not wanna do a bulk deal which is what the prefix "bulk" means to me? @Jellyfish; opinion???


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk