16 years and over forum.

[MissAlice]

I like that idea a lot. The only "flaw" I can see, which isn't a flaw but a potential complaint is that it will be suggested that management are biased in their screening or the criteria is unfair. But I suppose that could be dealt with as we go along.

If you set a fair criteria, then there will be less potential complaints, and with most things in life there are always going to be whiners, you can't please everyone. Perhaps one important part of the criteria could be, not necessarily need be, and this is just a suggestion: You must of been a member of habboxforum for a minimum of 6/9/12 months before you can be nominated.

That's a great idea, although the bit about exclusive forum members being banned from voting because of another member's actions is a bit unfair.

Although a larger amount of people to start than the example

Yeah, I do in a way agree with you, and although it might sound a little harsh, that wasn't my intention, if anything it may encourage members to think wisely before nominating another member to join that forum. If they then make the mistake of nominating an 'immature' member, for want of a better word, not allowing them to nominate again until three months have passed isn't really that harsh.

[Earthquake]

In all fairness, having a mature forum can actully sound insulting, And not allowing certain members into the mature/exclusive forum would be a bit discriminating on judge of view not judge of charater, we all tend to act imature some times, but what would this mature forum actully be doing what other forums won't be doing, their isn't much to this idea as all the other forums are taken for ideas, It would pretty much be the same as the spam forum and every time a arguement erupts the culprits in that forum would be removed.

[mangle]

Couldn't we make people sign a disclaimer and if it emerged they were below 16 give them a perm ban?

[HotelUser]

Couldn't we make people sign a disclaimer and if it emerged they were below 16 give them a perm ban?

Not if it's a mature forum. I think if it were 16+ than it wouldn't be fair to exclude younger members, as somebody said previously.

In all fairness, having a mature forum can actully sound insulting, And not allowing certain members into the mature/exclusive forum would be a bit discriminating on judge of view not judge of charater, we all tend to act imature some times, but what would this mature forum actully be doing what other forums won't be doing, their isn't much to this idea as all the other forums are taken for ideas, It would pretty much be the same as the spam forum and every time a arguement erupts the culprits in that forum would be removed.

I don't see it as insulting, I see it as a reward for active members who follow rules.

I like that idea a lot. The only "flaw" I can see, which isn't a flaw but a potential complaint is that it will be suggested that management are biased in their screening or the criteria is unfair. But I suppose that could be dealt with as we go along.

Well people can also think this way about jobs, though it's not a major issue I think, as I've not heard much about people complaining like that.

[Cool--]

Im cold

Edited By nvrspk4 (Assistant General Manager): Please don't post pointlessly.

[nvrspk4]

If you set a fair criteria, then there will be less potential complaints, and with most things in life there are always going to be whiners, you can't please everyone. Perhaps one important part of the criteria could be, not necessarily need be, and this is just a suggestion: You must of been a member of habboxforum for a minimum of 6/9/12 months before you can be nominated.

I like the idea of having to be a member for 6 months or maybe more. This stops people from creating "good" accounts and just using those to get in.

Yeah, I do in a way agree with you, and although it might sound a little harsh, that wasn't my intention, if anything it may encourage members to think wisely before nominating another member to join that forum. If they then make the mistake of nominating an 'immature' member, for want of a better word, not allowing them to nominate again until three months have passed isn't really that harsh.

I like the idea of having ramifications for nominating members, but I think just taking nomination rights for an extended period is fine. To some extent even the most mature people lose it, so excluding people would just make the mature forum members very reluctant to nominate others. Of course this might also mean that only the very mature got in.

In all fairness, having a mature forum can actully sound insulting, And not allowing certain members into the mature/exclusive forum would be a bit discriminating on judge of view not judge of charater, we all tend to act imature some times, but what would this mature forum actully be doing what other forums won't be doing, their isn't much to this idea as all the other forums are taken for ideas, It would pretty much be the same as the spam forum and every time a arguement erupts the culprits in that forum would be removed.

The mature forum would provide an area for discussion of topics in a different environment. However I do agree with you that really what it would be is the entire forum condensed into one forum, just with a different audience. There aren't really any topics that would be discussed in the "mature" forums that wouldn't be discussed here, so its all about the target audience, and the quality of the discussion.

By the way, no its not discrimination

Well people can also think this way about jobs, though it's not a major issue I think, as I've not heard much about people complaining like that.

No offense intended but wasn't it you who posted on these forums about how I was biased because I wouldn't give you or Ross a job based on a logical basis? (I really don't like to bring up the past as we're beyond that now, but I'm trying to make a point and you sort of lent yourself to it )

Im cold

Then get a sweater.

[Herman]

somehow i just don't agree with this idea.

it may be a good idea, but i just don't think it will work.

[HotelUser]

I like the idea of having to be a member for 6 months or maybe more. This stops people from creating "good" accounts and just using those to get in.

Yes, that is a good idea and will eliminate multiple accounts.

The mature forum would provide an area for discussion of topics in a different environment. However I do agree with you that really what it would be is the entire forum condensed into one forum, just with a different audience. There aren't really any topics that would be discussed in the "mature" forums that wouldn't be discussed here, so its all about the target audience, and the quality of the discussion.

By the way, no its not discrimination

Exactly.

No offense intended but wasn't it you who posted on these forums about how I was biased because I wouldn't give you or Ross a job based on a logical basis? (I really don't like to bring up the past as we're beyond that now, but I'm trying to make a point and you sort of lent yourself to it )
.

I believe I pmed you telling you somebody(and you know who) told me I wouldn't get a job because you don't like me. If you're referring to the thread Ross made on how it said he was fired but he wasn't. All I said was I think the announcement saying he resigned should say he resigned and that he wasn't making a fuss when he made that thread. Oh and you told me you wern't bias and would hire people you didn't like, you don't want me to agree with you ?

[today]

i fail to see it, Specially when this "no infractions, if get any you'll be removed from the forum" which admin's going to sit there and check all the time..

[HotelUser]

i fail to see it, Specially when this "no infractions, if get any you'll be removed from the forum" which admin's going to sit there and check all the time..

What? Why would an admin have to check the infractions? When a moderator wants to give an infraction they would check to see if the user is a member of this forum. If so they will contact an admin. Admins don't check anything .