Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678
Results 71 to 78 of 78
  1. #71
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    10,481
    Tokens
    3,140

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Saurav View Post
    http://habboxforum.com/showpost.php?...8&postcount=36

    I did reply, stop making stuff up to make yourself look better.
    That's FAQ, not the rules.

    Quote Originally Posted by Saurav View Post
    Last time I read a announcement relating to pictures, it said it is against the rules to actually upload the pictures onto the forum, and I am pretty sure you have to upload them when using a profile picture.
    If the rules for it has changed then its my fault for not reading the new rules relating to it.
    Yes, well, there's no rule against direct uploading to the forum

    Should just add a sentence to the Rules: All the content of the FAQ should be considered as rules.
    Otherwise people will continue to argue over small things when there are better things to sort out at the moment.
    Edit: Wait, wrong way round. The FAQ is badly written anyway
    Last edited by Chippiewill; 23-12-2009 at 12:20 AM.
    Chippiewill.


  2. #72
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Saurav View Post
    Should just add a sentence to the Rules: All the content of the FAQ should be considered as rules.
    Otherwise people will continue to argue over small things when there are better things to sort out at the moment.
    Definitely not a good suggestion, the rules just need to source from the FAQ, not the FAQ being taken as a new way of posting rules. That's like calling full fat butter "margerine" because you're too lazy to remove the fat. The rules just need to say:

    "Avatars must comply with the usergroup your account is in. See FAQ for account permissions (or what not)".

  3. #73
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,283
    Tokens
    2,031

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kk. View Post
    I have an idea.. Reverse the warning (which isn't a big deal anyway..), update the rules to whatever reds be, and just resize the avatar to fit your usergroup. Wait until you get VIP and then upload again..

    You were given 24 hours to save your avatar onto a computer if you hadn't already..
    I'd be happy with that. Its the fact i was punished for breaking a rule which does not exist i am annoyed at.

    Quote Originally Posted by FlyingJesus View Post
    Then if all else fails you still disobeyed a direct request from a smod, believing yourself above the situation instead of doing as you were told until you got an answer from Jin. There's nothing wrong with you getting hold of him but if you aren't going to comply with requests which (whether you believe it to be a rule or not) are obviously quite tame and would have caused you perhaps a minute to find a new avatar or edit your old one until you were put back in a usergroup in which moderation was happy with it. It's really not that difficult to not make a fuss of it especially when it's down to your own lack of compliance.
    1) the rule does not exist - if a police officer comes up to me and tells me the law says i have to give in a £10 i aint going to. If i'm arrested i get the feeling the fact a person in a position of authority is making up a rule (abuse of power) then taking action against an individual who broke no law, is a more servear matter than someone not obeying a fictional law.

    I tryed to comply, but since i was given no time limit, had no idea i had run out of time.
    Quote Originally Posted by Saurav View Post
    http://habboxforum.com/showpost.php?...8&postcount=36

    I did reply, stop making stuff up to make yourself look better.
    "Here are the avatar sizes for the following ranks:"

    yep that sounds like a rule. Definalty not an answer to a question

    Now outside the faq, in the rules. Go find the rule

  4. #74
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    7,601
    Tokens
    95

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    You do realise that when you click the forum rules, it basically takes you to the FAQ. And why aren't people replying to my posts. ;l


    Oh, you have now

  5. #75
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    7,392
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kk. View Post
    I have an idea.. Reverse the warning (which isn't a big deal anyway..), update the rules to whatever reds be, and just resize the avatar to fit your usergroup. Wait until you get VIP and then upload again..

    You were given 24 hours to save your avatar onto a computer if you hadn't already..
    Agree with this, minus the warning reversal. If we reversed Mentor's warning on this principle we'd have to reverse the other several hundred profile violation warnings and infractions.

    Quote Originally Posted by 00chips View Post
    Actually, yes you can put a picture of yourself as your profile picture.
    No, you cannot. Although profile picture rules are very unclear as profile pictures are a relatively new thing, this is something I am currently working on clarifying and have been for some time.

    Quote Originally Posted by Saurav View Post
    Last time I read a announcement relating to pictures, it said it is against the rules to actually upload the pictures onto the forum, and I am pretty sure you have to upload them when using a profile picture.
    If the rules for it has changed then its my fault for not reading the new rules relating to it.
    That is what the announcement said, yes

    Quote Originally Posted by GommeInc View Post
    How is that common sense? Common sense is posting your avatar without the fear of being bum raped somewhere, as there is no rational reason for having a "rule" for this in the first place And FAQs by definition are not rules, they're questions that are frequently asked Perhaps the rules need beefing up in one of the updates, and the FAQ fixed?
    Bold part would be a good solution to resolve this argument, however as I've said before no others have complained about this, but to make things a lot easier I believe you are right and the rules should be edited slightly and I've been talking to MattGarner about this.

    Quote Originally Posted by Saurav View Post
    Should just add a sentence to the Rules: All the content of the FAQ should be considered as rules.
    Otherwise people will continue to argue over small things when there are better things to sort out at the moment.
    This is also a possibility
    "You live more riding bikes like these for 5 minutes than most people do in their entire lives"

    RIP Marco Simoncelli ~ 1987 - 2011
    Previous Habbox Roles: Shows Manager, Help Desk Manager, Forum Moderator, Forum Super Moderator, Assistant Forum Manager, Forum Manager, Assistant General Manager (Staff), General Manager.

    Retired from Habbox May 2011


  6. #76
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,542
    Tokens
    4,023
    Habbo
    -S-G-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mentor View Post

    "Here are the avatar sizes for the following ranks:"

    yep that sounds like a rule. Definalty not an answer to a question

    Now outside the faq, in the rules. Go find the rule
    I clearly explained why I said what I did in my post, so once again, yes I did reply to your post. You are just being very silly now.

    Your example of Yahoo Answers vs Law is just :S
    It is nothing in comparison to HabboxForum FAQ vs HabboxForum Rules.

  7. #77
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,587
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    o m g it's only an avatar

  8. #78
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,590
    Tokens
    33,601
    Habbo
    xxMATTGxx

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by invincible View Post
    Agree with this, minus the warning reversal. If we reversed Mentor's warning on this principle we'd have to reverse the other several hundred profile violation warnings and infractions.



    No, you cannot. Although profile picture rules are very unclear as profile pictures are a relatively new thing, this is something I am currently working on clarifying and have been for some time.



    That is what the announcement said, yes



    Bold part would be a good solution to resolve this argument, however as I've said before no others have complained about this, but to make things a lot easier I believe you are right and the rules should be edited slightly and I've been talking to MattGarner about this.



    This is also a possibility
    Agreed with Oli regarding the warning and also the changes that other users have already mentioned.

    ----------------------------------

    I think this has go on long enough for this small issue. To stop any more problems and confusion regarding the avatar limits and so on, there will be an update letting members know about the limits.

    No, because then VIPs don't have an signature image limit (Not that they technically do at the moment).
    "Donator signature images may not exceed 700 pixels x 300 pixels in total size"

    Donator/VIP, very similar thing. Under B2.

    Thanks to anyone whos put good suggestions.

    Thread Closed.


    Previous Habbox Roles
    Co-Owner of Habbox | General Manager | Assistant General Manager (Staff) | Forum Manager | Super Moderator | Forum Moderator

Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •