Jon Venables back in Jail

[Catzsy]

If the report is true, he should never be released. He got a second chance, and he blew it.

Well there seems to be significient rumours about serious charges relating to child pornography. His new identity will come out now I believe at the trial and he is at great risks from reprisals in prison.

[Seatherny]

I highly doubt they will reveal his new identity at trial if they havent dont so far.
However, people will find out though through leaks etc.

[Jordy]

Well there seems to be significient rumours about serious charges relating to child pornography. His new identity will come out now I believe at the trial and he is at great risks from reprisals in prison.

That's true and I don't think the Prison Service seems too fussed about reprisals which is good. It was always obvious the Baby P killer was going to be attacked at some point, and just a few months into it and he was brutally attacked.

[Catzsy]

I highly doubt they will reveal his new identity at trial if they havent dont so far.
However, people will find out though through leaks etc.

That's what I meant. =]

[Jack.Lfc]

His new name and adress is going round in a text down these ways apparently.

[Seatherny]

Its highly disrespectful of him breaking the law again tbh.

He got a second chance, a new life, a new look, and millions spent on him of taxpayers money and this is how he behaves. Its a disgrace.

[Gibs960]

Should think so, murdering piece of scum, I think he should of got longer, and I think we should know his name, we don't know who you're dealing with when people like him are protected.

[Circadia]

i think its disgusting that some people think that ten years old's would no better . But certainly by that age you would know what's right and what's wrong and when your ten you would look for children just to kill them ?! but the worst thing is they left him to get run over by a train.

[Black_Apalachi]

I can't even be arsed reading the deluded responses in this thread such as how "he was only 10". Oh right, I must have missed the point during my childhood at which I was allowed to commit murder. As for concealing their identities; that's understandable but now that this scum bag has re-offended and is no longer a minor, he should no longer posses the right to anonymity. Even at the poor little age of 10, his victim was TWO YEARS OF AGE and he still needed an accomplice. It's about time the piece of **** grew a pair and faced the world.

It completely makes me sick. Little Jamie was barely three months older than me, and I lived in Bootle at the time. I say we borrow the chair off the yanks and don't wet the sponge. The Green Mile: Part II.

[Hitman]

I can't even be arsed reading the deluded responses in this thread such as how "he was only 10". Oh right, I must have missed the point during my childhood at which I was allowed to commit murder. As for concealing their identities; that's understandable but now that this scum bag has re-offended and is no longer a minor, he should no longer posses the right to anonymity. Even at the poor little age of 10, his victim was TWO YEARS OF AGE and he still needed an accomplice. It's about time the piece of **** grew a pair and faced the world.

It completely makes me sick. Little Jamie was barely three months older than me, and I lived in Bootle at the time. I say we borrow the chair off the yanks and don't wet the sponge. The Green Mile: Part II.

I agree. :8