
Considering the fact that Zuth wrote in the warning pm he sent me that he was pretty much unsure himself if it deserved removal I would say it's safe to suggest it shouldn't have been removed and left unless it was reported.Being offended is subjective, moderation discretion is subjective. I do not like the idea that something has to be direct for it to constitute being offensive because it is often those indirect remarks that are, in my opinion, more offensive. Perhaps moderators should wait until someone complains about the material before acting on it but I think it's wrong to suggest that your post was fine because it was only implying something nasty rather than saying it outright.
That's when Ron vanished, came back speaking Spanish
Lavish habits, two rings, twenty carats
There's no point removing it after someone's been offended.
Chippiewill.
At what point did I say I was unsure, oh I didn't. I said it could of offended her, as already stated, I'm not a mind reader.
Utter rubbish if you can't read that, your on an internet forum, people don't write like the queen on here you know, how elitist are you really? Not that that was even that bad tbh.If you have a problem with the warning then ask for it to be removed IN THE CORRECT FORUM. Feedback isn't the place for your personal issues with moderators and how they've screwed up on occasion. Errors are probable and there's a system to handle them. use it.
Report button is there for a reason
return please when you grammar has. Can't read what you're saying.
Evidently numerous other people agree that there's a problem so feedback appears to be the most suitable section, however you are correct, initially the thread deserved to be in the complaints section but clearly this thread has evolved from its original purpose.
---------- Post added 02-05-2012 at 06:53 PM ----------
wait, isn't that private information?
That's when Ron vanished, came back speaking Spanish
Lavish habits, two rings, twenty carats
He's the one that sent it.
From you being burthurt about being told off to you saying the system is flawed when you're not even using the system?
Last edited by Chippiewill; 02-05-2012 at 05:56 PM.
Chippiewill.
hahaha private information after you mentioned it first. Now you really are just trying to take cheap shots.
Although I agree that the 'please do not offend other users' rule would actually need to offend someone before it was removed.![]()
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!