Rate the persons above signature

[msb.]

-10/10
simply bad.

[jesus]

unrated

[msb.]

5/10
simple

[jesus]

0/10 you are simple

[GhostFace-]

i just posted idk whos sig.

10/10

EDIT: k im happy i gave 10 xox

[Earthquake]

Love it, 8.10

[jesus]

0/10 its gay

[dannyisnotamazing]

Ignoring the poor layout design (which really doesn’t add to its credibility), the first thing that struck me was “How is this aloud?” When I come across a “signature” this is always one of the first things I look at because if it isn’t good how they show it, there is a chance it could be lame. I also knew that this particular signature had to be a joke becase one of the first things I saw was “Children” at the bottom. After reading more about this signature and actually taking into account. I don’t think this signature is lame. First impressions, however, make a world of difference. I definitely suggest the guy bucks his ideas up about the layout of this signature, and the presentation.

[jesus]

lol wth. 0/10.

[Earthquake]

Ignoring the poor layout design (which really doesn’t add to its credibility), the first thing that struck me was “How is this aloud?” When I come across a “signature” this is always one of the first things I look at because if it isn’t good how they show it, there is a chance it could be lame. I also knew that this particular signature had to be a joke becase one of the first things I saw was “Children” at the bottom. After reading more about this signature and actually taking into account. I don’t think this signature is lame. First impressions, however, make a world of difference. I definitely suggest the guy bucks his ideas up about the layout of this signature, and the presentation.

lol that was great

9/10