Aflux

[Bomb-Head]

It was me, mistaking something for something else - THUS why I edited it.

Lies, I won't be missed

Oh I see - and you will

[nvrspk4]

It was a struggle trying to keep you in line enough so that you could stay, guess you were bount to step over the line eventually

Bye Adam. You could be a real pain in the :rude: sometimes (you know what I'm talking about ) but you were a great worker and I liked you alot

Stay around, you make things entertaining!

[iCosmo]

I thought you meant he died

[today]

It was a struggle trying to keep you in line enough so that you could stay, guess you were bount to step over the line eventually

Bye Adam. You could be a real pain in the :rude: sometimes (you know what I'm talking about ) but you were a great worker and I liked you alot

Stay around, you make things entertaining!

I thought i was your pain in the ***

[The Professor]

I thought i was your pain in the ***

Nah, that's me. We've had some pretty heated arguments over PM

It still makes me laugh how everyone is arguing over this "free speech" thing. There IS a way to express disagreement with things that have happened, but the way you do it makes all the difference. Again, I can only speak from my experience in articles, but there's criticism flying every which way in the staff forums, and because it's done in the right way it's allowed and often encouraged. That is precisely the reason for these feedback forums; for members to provide constructive criticism, or "free speech" as it should be.

The problems you get is when people start abusing this "free speech", adapting the word "free" to how they like it and start hurling abuse and insults left, right and centre. You then have management having to step in to break it up, which makes people upset that they can't abuse people, and your riots escalate as such. Strike the right tone and you can get whatever point across that you want

Hence mine and nvr's heated arguments