
15 posts rule lowered to 5 & thread viewing limitations on non-registered users implemented.
Would like to see 15 posts rule lowered to 5 and would not like to see thread viewing limitations
Would like to see thread viewing limitations to guests but would not like the 15 posts rule lowered to 5
I would not like to see any of these changes made
Except from advertising revenues (Although I doubt that really covers the cost of keeping the server up for their page views) and 'exposure' which I doubt matters that much to be honest.
Chippiewill.
Great idea - if the plans to prevent people from joining?Well, lots of forums that I go on have a restriction on viewing threads if you are not a registred member, e.g. if you were not registered on Habbox Forum, and you tried to view more than 3 threads, then a page would come up saying "You have reached your weekly supply of threads, this is because you aren't registred at Habbox Forum! Click here to register to see the thread you were trying to access".
Why?
People Join forums for 2 main reasons:
1) someone asked them to (someone they know) - In this case preventing people reading topics is useless.
2) got linked or stumbled accross a thread, since the topic interested them, they registered to reply (this is the sole reason i join forums) - Since no one can read through the threads, next to no one in this category is likely to join.
So basically adding such a feature would stop around half of potental members ever registering, which taking in to account this group is the most likely to be active and stick around for a while, is quite a big problem.
Guests do no harm, they view ad's like everyone else, just becuse they dont reply is no reason to prevent them from viewing.
In my opinion its a foolish move even to concider trying to force users to register if they dont want to, all it odes is make the forum look desperte and put people off even more.
Bad, idea. Very bad idea.
On lowering the post requirements, maybe you have a point, 5 posts allows people to start useing the forum normally quicker - although i'm not aware of the volumes of spam posts and fake accounts that generally make the rounds so this to may not be appropite.
I. LOVE. YOU. There is another side of it and everyone thinks I'm crazy for saying it.Great idea - if the plans to prevent people from joining?
Why?
People Join forums for 2 main reasons:
1) someone asked them to (someone they know) - In this case preventing people reading topics is useless.
2) got linked or stumbled accross a thread, since the topic interested them, they registered to reply (this is the sole reason i join forums) - Since no one can read through the threads, next to no one in this category is likely to join.
So basically adding such a feature would stop around half of potental members ever registering, which taking in to account this group is the most likely to be active and stick around for a while, is quite a big problem.
Guests do no harm, they view ad's like everyone else, just becuse they dont reply is no reason to prevent them from viewing.
In my opinion its a foolish move even to concider trying to force users to register if they dont want to, all it odes is make the forum look desperte and put people off even more.
Bad, idea. Very bad idea.
On lowering the post requirements, maybe you have a point, 5 posts allows people to start useing the forum normally quicker - although i'm not aware of the volumes of spam posts and fake accounts that generally make the rounds so this to may not be appropite.
WILL EVERYONE PLEASE STOP TALKING ABOUT FIVE POSTS???
It was in this thread!!
It costs nothing to be a good friend.
American and Proud
I also use the account nvrspk on other computers.
![]()
lol you've all gone and pissed off nvr![]()
Didn't you know? Americans don't believe in democracy!!!
PSN: StefanWolves
Add me if you play COD Black Ops or Fifa 11.
The majority (as I've said before) clearly don't know what they're on about as they've voted either without posting at all or with just "yeh gd idea" or something along those lines. Democracy and voting isn't always the best way to run things, certainly not on a forum like this for one
The forum never has and never will be democratic. That's a good thing. If this was implemented there would be more members. However, as has pointed out it's not getting new members which is the issue, it's keeping them and there doesn't seem to be a solution to this at the present time. Certainly no long term ones anyway.
Wow, man can step foot on the moon but a Habbo forum cannot find ways to keep members on it's forum? yeah.
PSN: StefanWolves
Add me if you play COD Black Ops or Fifa 11.
You're right those are entirely similar concepts what's wrong with us
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!