The Human Centipede II - UK Release BANNED

[GommeInc]

The sandpaper scene that people have heard about and not seen (the biggest flaw in the opinion of anyone who's ever been for film censorship) is perfectly legal behind closed doors.

It's a movie, it's no reality.

As far as the description of the film goes, seeing the First one a second time with someone getting off to it is probably not what constitutes a film or one that should be given a certificate. It's like filming someone watching The Rugrats Movie who at the same time is enjoying a tender moment with a chain cutter.

People are also forgetting what the BBFC and what an 18 certificate is. An 18 certificate has its limits - heck, many films with sex scenes are 18 yet the story of the film isn't necessarily bad.

[Judas]

Movies don't mess people up.

are you sure?

have you heard of james bulger?

[Stephen]

well to be honest anyone that murders someone because of a film is sick anyway, the film didn't make them sick

[Misawa]

are you sure?

have you heard of james bulger?

That was sensationalisitic reporting. They never had even actually seen Child's Play III.

Those kids were mentally unstable to begin with. Films don't make perfectly healthy people do anything wrong, only those who are already disturbed.

[Judas]

That was sensationalisitic reporting. They never had even actually seen Child's Play III.

Those kids were mentally unstable to begin with. Films don't make perfectly healthy people do anything wrong, only those who are already disturbed.

okay so what about that gang that kidnapped raped, tortured and murdered a girl while playing her a tape of one of them saying "im chucky wanna play?" over and over again or something like that?

and i agree, but they can still influence people to do things, messed up already or not.

well to be honest anyone that murders someone because of a film is sick anyway, the film didn't make them sick

yeah i know. but it can make the sick sicker i suppose

[peteyt]

This seems to be going back and forward.

The film shouldn't be banned, but I do feel the director is trying to push the boundaries on purpose. As the article says people will get hold of it anyway's so even with a ban its not like anyone's going to see the film.

You may hate illegal downloading but when a film is banned people often turn to it - there's no real other way sometimes.

But no mater if the film is banned or not it doesn't hide the fact it's a stupid mindless horror flick that has no real purpose.

[Misawa]

If film-makers didn't dare to push boundaries the state of cinema today would be very, very different.

[peteyt]

If film-makers didn't dare to push boundaries the state of cinema today would be very, very different.

There's a difference between pushing the boundaries and making a ultra violent film with no other content. I'm going to watch the first one soon but I've been told it's just a violent film with bad acting, bad everything else.

I'd like the film more if it had more substance. There's films that people find sick but don't just rely of violence, as in they actually have a story and other stuff going on.

[Mark]

Gutted haha! Am I the only one who was actually looking forward to a cringe worthy film? There are no decent horrors these days, I thought this might have been a good film.

[peteyt]

This just seems like every other film to me. Yeah the first had a unique idea but it uses other recent films that have been banned or cut and simply tries to top them