Is Homosexual Adoption Right? (ENDS 24/7/11)

[-:Undertaker:-]

Oh yes, two people trapped in a loveless marriage with children stuck in the middle. That must be very healthy for them. I think not.

The point would be to discourage these marriages in the first place. If the old social attitudes still existed, girls would be afraid to have sex in fear of the shame of becoming pregnant along with wanting to get married to the right guy and the other way round. It brings in a degree of rationality.

I would personally get the government out of marriage anyway as I stated before.

That isnt the way my mother sees it but obviously she turned out wrong so ill let you off.

Haven't stated every case from each would turn out wrong, no system is infallible nor is any system totally wrong in all cases. But on the whole, yes the traditional family is by far the best and again I pointed to broken homes around the country where the woman is married to the state and the child has no father, the state provides where the father should do.

[FlyingJesus]

You do know that a lot of council estates are occupied by married people, right?

[Inseriousity.]

If the old attitudes existed, girls wouldn't be afraid to have sex, they'd have it then have to hush up their baby when they make a mistake. The "traditional" family unit only works if the family provides stability and love. If one is lacking then I find the homosexual couple who can provide it far more superior to the heterosexual couple who can't.

[Tom]

This 'debate' is like saying, you can't eat 2 strawberry's at the same time, you have to eat a strawberry and a grape. You cannot force someone to be straight or gay and as I've said - what if they want a child? But obviously they can't because they're gay and it's there fault. That's the way I see this 'debate' going. That it's there fault they're gay and that it needs to be changed or else you can't have a baby. It doesn't matter whether you have 2 women, 2 men, 1 of each parents!

[Inseriousity.]

This 'debate' is like saying, you can't eat 2 strawberry's at the same time, you have to eat a strawberry and a grape.

LOLOLOL weirdest analogy I've ever read.

[Tom]

LOLOLOL weirdest analogy I've ever read.

It's late okay?! Lol! It's all I could think of. But honestly it's like that personally speaking, when I'm settled down I would want to adopt I suppose? Then they grow old and I'll kick them out (joke). But all I want is for one child, who's been put up for adoption for one reason or another to be happy!

------------------------

Awkward when it's talking about Gay Adoption on Eastenders ;o

[The Don]

I'm comparing the lack of a father figure and mother figure and the results from that.

Yes, but estates tend to have other issues such as poverty, crime etc, it's hardly fair to compare those results on the grounds that they lack father/mother figures, as gay couples who want to adopt wont be coming from estates etc.

[Conservative,]

I read the first & last page, and to be honest, how can this even be a debate?

I've been living with a gay couple for the last 2 weeks (my Godfather & his partner) for work experience, and I can honestly say they are very caring and I would have no problem (other than the food they cook being a bit different to what I'm used to) living with them permanently should something happen to my parents.

Yes, the child might get bullied for having 2 Mums or Dads, but if it's not for having 2 mums or Dads, it will be for something else - as FJ already said - they'll get bullied for being adopted anyway.

As long as they go through the normal procedure of checks and forms as any heterosexual couple, I have no problem with a same-sex couple adopting. If you do, go back to the 19th century.

[Shar]

I read the first & last page, and to be honest, how can this even be a debate?

I've been living with a gay couple for the last 2 weeks (my Godfather & his partner) for work experience, and I can honestly say they are very caring and I would have no problem (other than the food they cook being a bit different to what I'm used to) living with them permanently should something happen to my parents.

Yes, the child might get bullied for having 2 Mums or Dads, but if it's not for having 2 mums or Dads, it will be for something else - as FJ already said - they'll get bullied for being adopted anyway.

As long as they go through the normal procedure of checks and forms as any heterosexual couple, I have no problem with a same-sex couple adopting. If you do, go back to the 19th century.

Wait what - people get bullied for being adopted? What?


I don't see the problem in it, all a child needs is shelter and loving parents.

[Marbian]

I have strong opinion's over homosexuality anyway. If a gay man can still make babies, then he should. The way I see things, you don't need to fancy that person to love them, to make babies and a family with them. Yeah, adoption is great, but I think it should be for people who can't make babies.

After all, life it self is about living on the humans, and surviving. I accept homosexuals as freedom, and being, doing, whatever you like. I don't accept it as a normal thing though, but I don't care about that and I wouldn't rub it into someone who chooses to be gay.

And another way I see it is, human and dog, obviously... wrong, isn't meant to be. But I find my dog cute, should I do it anyway? hmm no... and I think the same as human man to man. Obviously, the concept of sex altogether is producing a human. You can't do that with a man, and of course, i don't even think we need scinence to know it's man and women.

I hope no one tries to troll me because I think this. Everyone has different opinion's.