Pointless posting

[Yawn]

Tbh I think it should only be deemed "pointless" (any post) as long as it's completely irrelevant to the thread at hand.

So posting "Dinner" in the thread about food would be fine.
Tom's post about correcting the thread title would be fine.
Phil's post referring to an ambulance in a thread concerning ambulances would be fine.

But if I posted something like

Chicken

in the "what are you wearing right now" thread, then that would be pointless. Otherwise I think everything else (even "dinner" no matter how broad it is) shouldn't warrant any warning as it is quite clear some people do have stigma attached to them and can get pointless post for anything, that someone else might not.

-

this post is the future of habbox cant warn me now HAHAHHAHAHHHA

[Kardan]

Hey, mods don't make the rules, we just enforce them


It did until it was edited today. It did read something like "You may not make one or two word replies"

Didn't even notice that the date on the rules had changed.
@Chris;

http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...74#post8092674

This thread says:

So to be clear, from now on we will be:

•Moving any threads that allow for one or two worded replies to spam. If you disagree with a thread being moved then please contact me via PM.

This rule is different from the one in the rules. The rules state that if a thread can ONLY give short replies, it gets moved. Your new rule in the announcement says if ANY thread CAN be answered with a short reply, it gets moved...

If the new rule is the case, you best get moving many, many, many threads.

[MKR&*42]

but what if you're lady gaga and actually wearing food?

Lmao I worried someone would bring up a meat dress or something.

[Aiden]

i can answer anything with one word... try me

[Matthew]

i can answer anything with one word... try me

What is your full name?

[Aiden]

What is your full name?

stalker >.>

[Calum0812]

This rule is different from the one in the rules. The rules state that if a thread can ONLY give short replies, it gets moved. Your new rule in the announcement says if ANY thread CAN be answered with a short reply, it gets moved...

If the new rule is the case, you best get moving many, many, many threads.

They have been changed further since that announcement but I assume an announcement wasn't posted due to the small changes, however, these small changes mean big things for pointless posts (like the one word thing being changed slightly).

The rule needs to be re-done, make sure everyone is CRYSTAL CLEAR and then post an announcement. Moderator discretion isn't enough in this case because of how much this rule is broken

[Matthew]

stalker >.>

Well given that you have a link to your twitter in your signature, I'd say hardly

[j0rd]

No it's not unless topics now need to strictly adhere to the title, which is quite frankly ridiculous when said topic title is so specific. Someone took the thread title and posted about it on the general theme to which Phil replied. That's not off topic, that's called discussion. If discussion is actually generated, threads evolve out of their beginnings into something new. This is why most spam threads are actually interesting because there is more freedom to bounce from one topic to another.

I'm just going on what would have been deemed pointless before, and that would have.

[Aiden]

Well given that you have a link to your twitter in your signature, I'd say hardly

Hopefully you'd say 'hardly' followed by a whole paragraph or you might get a warning.

And btw is that against the rules? asking for my private ifno?

report you anyway