Have to agree. While I enjoyed the finale it felt like just random stuff simply there to add to the end. I didn't like how we didn't see a lot like most of it was him thinking back, I'd have rather saw how it happened. I'm a big fan of the original who and while a lot of the audience of today's who would find it dragged too much, to me it was just right. Stories in classic who could be told well, and while some of new who's are, some of them seem to be rushed.
I have to disagree about series 1 being bad. I think Eccleston is quite underrated. He wasn't really active outside the filming, didn't seem to do a lot of promotion on shows and so on like Tennant and Smith, and it just seems like he gets overlooked. I liked the fact that the doctor we got was played like someone with a load of bad past on his shoulder. He played at times the hard doctor. It got annoying when we got the opposite all the time with Tennant, instead of trying to hide the past he'd just turn all upset.
However I do think series 6 wasn't exactly child friendly. It was, but it also had all the complicated stuff, which a lot of people said where confusing for the young. It is a family show, but it does have adult elements, and I think this series could have had more than some.
One question. Does anyone think that the internet has changed a lot of shows though. I mean I wasn't around when Doctor Who was on, but I could imagine without the net, people thought each adventure he may die at times. Now we can see a load of info on multiple episodes coming up so we know he'll survive.






Reply With Quote





