We need a trusted list, again.

[Badgez]

The trades forum is pointless. People with 1 rep and 10 post count are going "no ur not trusted!!111 im trusted!" to someone thats been here for over two years. We need a "Trusted peoples" list like ezzie made before. Post here if you support

[micky.blue.eyes]

Nah, people vouch for others in threads so I don't think we need a trusted list, you got to make up your own mind anyway, if you trust them, trade, if you don't, trade with somebody else.

[Galaxay.]

Well said ^ ;]

[Steven.]

No we don't.

As someone could make two accounts, say they're trusted on the othr account when they'e not... so thats why it got removed.

[micky.blue.eyes]

Well said ^ ;]

Thank you and welcome back spam god.

[Ezzie.]

No we don't.

As someone could make two accounts, say they're trusted on the othr account when they'e not... so thats why it got removed.

I agree with steve. This was the reason that i'd closed it as a member told me via msn that he made two accounts to scam on and said on his original account that he had vouched for him. So things are best left as they are.

[:Jamie]

And the thread got totally spammed agree with wat steven said.

[Infrontation]

Keep it the way it is. If someone where too scam someone the creator of the thread would get flamed, and people can make other accounts and "vouch" for them and get there name placed on the list!
Safe

[JoeyK.]

I don't personally think we need it, the truly trusted people are known enough, and if they vouch for someone it should be enough... The biggest problems with the list is firstly that people would simply vouch for themselves on a different account, and that if we follow the rules, we could never accuse someone of scamming- Thus, if someone was on the trusted list and they scammed you, you would be unable to report it, and they would remain on the list ready to scam again.

[Ashley 12344]

Although all these people saying they are trusted when they arent, and saying trusted people arent trusted is annoying.