They should just make their average over rune rate.
Would be much more understandable.
They should just make their average over rune rate.
Would be much more understandable.
I think it could be like this
say England have scored 200 (10 runs an over
Pakistan have scored 100 (5 runs an over)
That leaves a gap of 100 which when divided by 20 gives 5 so England's run rate would be +5 and Pakistan's would be -5
.
It could but it isn't because Englands net over run rate is something stupid like 1.3X...
Dno, it sucks though, they should make it something simple like, who hits most 6's and 4's? that'd make it much more viewer friendly.
Oh man! Deep down I had a feeling England stood a chance (and I even said it in the other thread or this one ... I cant remember) but I really did think Pakistan could pull it off.
I didnt watch the match and havent read up on it either so I have no idea what went wrong for Pakistan.
Now I hope Netherlands beat Pakistan, but I reckon Pakistan will end up beating them.
even if they do they will still be out, they need to beat them by like 50 runs to go through.
In T20, anything can happen.
Nope, it has to be a wider margin than they lost to England. I think 55 would be a good approximate.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!