HabboxWiki needs you!
Are you a Habbo buff? Or maybe a rare trader with a bunch of LTDs? Get involved with HabboxWiki to share your knowledge!
Join our team!
Whether you're raving for rares, excited for events or happy helping, there's something for you! Click here to apply
Need a helping hand?
Check out our guides for all things to help you make friends, make rooms, and make money!


Page 10 of 43 FirstFirst ... 6789101112131420 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 429
  1. #91
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,236
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Scholes is better than De Jong
    Carrick is better than Ireland
    SWP is better than Valencia

  2. #92
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    808
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thyflux View Post
    Scholes is better than De Jong
    Carrick is better than Ireland
    SWP is better than Valencia
    How can you say Carrick is better than Ireland?

    They're different types of players?

    Same with ginger todger and De Jong.

  3. #93
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Wolverhampton
    Posts
    4,825
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thyflux View Post
    Scholes is better than De Jong
    Carrick is better than Ireland
    SWP is better than Valencia
    Valencia still has something to prove, but he's got a lot to offer.

    @Minstrels; I don't rate Carrick at all, but I'd say he's on par with Ireland, and yes, they ARE smiliar players, as are Scholes and De Jong now (because Scholes doesn't charge forward as much anymore), Scholes can't tackle to save his life, but his passing more than makes up for that.
    Last edited by StefanWolves; 19-09-2009 at 01:49 PM.
    PSN: StefanWolves
    Add me if you play COD Black Ops or Fifa 11.

  4. #94
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    808
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheWolf View Post
    Valencia still has something to prove, but he's got a lot to offer.

    @Minstrels; I don't rate Carrick at all, but I'd say he's on par with Ireland, and yes, they ARE smiliar players, as are Scholes and De Jong now (because Scholes doesn't charge forward as much anymore), Scholes can't tackle to save his life, but his passing more than makes up for that.
    Then they're not similar players? De Jongs tackling and passing is his game. His tackles are beautiful.

  5. #95
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,236
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lBlue View Post
    How can you say Carrick is better than Ireland?

    They're different types of players?

    Same with ginger todger and De Jong.
    What a stupid argument. Of course they're different types of players because guess what... they are different players.

    That's how comparisons are made.

    Carrick is better than Ireland, from an un-biased party.

  6. #96
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Wolverhampton
    Posts
    4,825
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thyflux View Post
    What a stupid argument. Of course they're different types of players because guess what... they are different players.

    That's how comparisons are made.

    Carrick is better than Ireland, from an un-biased party.
    This.

    makeslonger
    PSN: StefanWolves
    Add me if you play COD Black Ops or Fifa 11.

  7. #97
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    devonshire
    Posts
    16,952
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Carrick is quality.

  8. #98
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Wolverhampton
    Posts
    4,825
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lBlue View Post
    Then they're not similar players? De Jongs tackling and passing is his game. His tackles are beautiful.
    Hows De Jongs passing? my guess is no where near Scholesy's standards.
    PSN: StefanWolves
    Add me if you play COD Black Ops or Fifa 11.

  9. #99
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    4,650
    Tokens
    2,500

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    If City play SWP, De Jong, Barry, Robinho (I know they can't but I'm saying in the future)
    And United play: Valencia, Carrick, Hargreaves, Nani/Giggs/Anderson. Then I'd say on current forum:

    SWP > Valencia
    De Jong < Carrick
    Barry > Hargreaves
    Robinho > Them three.

    So yeah I'd say City have a better midfield personally. Also, they have the right balance as they have two holding midfielders, and two out and out wingers.

    Also defence wise:

    O'Shea = Richards (Equal)
    Ferdinand > Toure
    Vidic > Lescott
    Evra > Bridge

    Attacking:

    Rooney > Tevez
    Adebayor > Berbatov

    So yeah basically:

    Uniteds defence is better, City's midfield is better and the strike force is equal.

    City have better subs though so I think if both teams were fit it would be quite equal. But, because of injurys, tomorrow I'd say on paper:

    Citys defence is better, Midfield is equal, Uniteds strike force is better.

    So yeah, I'd say a 1-1 draw or a 1-0 win to United.
    Last edited by CHA!NGANG; 19-09-2009 at 02:27 PM.


  10. #100
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Wolverhampton
    Posts
    4,825
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CHA!NGANG View Post
    If City play SWP, De Jong, Barry, Robinho (I know they can't but I'm saying in the future)
    And United play: Valencia, Carrick, Hargreaves, Nani/Giggs/Anderson. Then I'd say on current forum:

    SWP > Valencia
    De Jong < Carrick (Equal)
    Barry > Hargreaves
    Robinho > Them three.

    So yeah I'd say City have a better midfield personally. Also, they have the right balance as they have two holding midfielders, and two out and out wingers.

    Also defence wise:

    O'Shea = Richards (Equal)
    Ferdinand > Toure
    Vidic > Lescott
    Evra > Bridge

    Attacking:

    Rooney > Tevez
    Adebayor > Berbatov

    So yeah basically:

    Uniteds defence is better, City's midfield is better and the strike force is equal.

    City have better subs though so I think if both teams were fit it would be quite equal. But, because of injurys, tomorrow I'd say on paper:

    Citys defence is better, Midfield is equal, Uniteds strike force is better.

    So yeah, I'd say a 1-1 draw or a 1-0 win to United.
    True, but MU have a FAR suprerior defence, and they're without Adebayor, which swings it MUs way + you can't buy experience, which is what Giggs and Scholes have over ALL of the City midfielders.

    I've already said, that I thought City would win, but that was when they didn't have any injuries/bans.

    Now I am going to have to say that I think MU will win, and comfortably, if City had all their players, then I think they would win. But '**** Happens'.
    Last edited by StefanWolves; 19-09-2009 at 02:18 PM.
    PSN: StefanWolves
    Add me if you play COD Black Ops or Fifa 11.

Page 10 of 43 FirstFirst ... 6789101112131420 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •