View Full Version : The Ashes Tour, 2009.
Tintinnabulate
12-08-2009, 08:52 PM
Flintoff's last test on the 20th. I hope England get trashed. Would be the perfect send off for that show off Flintoff.
StefanWolves
12-08-2009, 09:48 PM
Flintoff's last test on the 20th. I hope England get trashed. Would be the perfect send off for that show off Flintoff.
You are totally wrong.
Good luck Flintoff, great servant for English cricket, and a great world figure for cricket, just make sure those ashes come back home to England! :)
Tintinnabulate
13-08-2009, 05:58 AM
Well mainly people agree with me. After telling them how Flintoff always thinks he is better than everyone else and is a obvious show off and loves himself, they can now see what I meant and agree with me. You can clearly tell by his celebrations that he is an idiot. The guy has no respect for his team, otherwise he wont be drunk before matches :\ Say sorry. And then do it again. He doesn't know what sorry means. Its a shame IPL teams will carry on paying a lot of money for someone who is useless.
o.O just found many others who think the same :)
Yes, he won the match for them, not why I hate him. It's because of his wicket celebrations. It shows of a overrated fool who's cocky and so on.....
There's about 4 threads just for this ****, even his own user (FLINTOFF = IDIOT?). Although he bowled really really well last test, I agree he is over rated, and his celebrations are wanky. Not to mention he is an alcoholic.
hes not team man thats for sure..team player acknowledge team mates beofre themselves...reminds me of an AFL player Jeff famrer from freo.....
StefanWolves
13-08-2009, 09:26 AM
Well mainly people agree with me. After telling them how Flintoff always thinks he is better than everyone else and is a obvious show off and loves himself, they can now see what I meant and agree with me. You can clearly tell by his celebrations that he is an idiot. The guy has no respect for his team, otherwise he wont be drunk before matches :\ Say sorry. And then do it again. He doesn't know what sorry means. Its a shame IPL teams will carry on paying a lot of money for someone who is useless.
o.O just found many others who think the same :)
You're wrong.
Well they're obviously the minority, you just picked out those off some other forum, and you didn't even provide any sources/names.
The majority in this forum who have posted in this thread so far admire Flintoff, it's only you that dislikes him.
Wow, you found three people that don't like his 'attitude' - and thats many others......... :rolleyes:
Catzsy
13-08-2009, 10:45 AM
Well mainly people agree with me. After telling them how Flintoff always thinks he is better than everyone else and is a obvious show off and loves himself, they can now see what I meant and agree with me. You can clearly tell by his celebrations that he is an idiot. The guy has no respect for his team, otherwise he wont be drunk before matches :\ Say sorry. And then do it again. He doesn't know what sorry means. Its a shame IPL teams will carry on paying a lot of money for someone who is useless.
o.O just found many others who think the same :)
Well I do agree with TheWolf here that is hardly many others and the quotes have no names? Quite honestly none of us know what Flintoff is really like only what we have read in the media and quite honestly what have personalities got to do with it ? Hardly a useless cricketer as well - he has been a great servant to the game. The same could be said of Ian Botham who was one of the greatest around at the the time. Just because they play sport doesn't mean they have to be angels - they are employed for their skills and you can hardly query his stats :)
Tintinnabulate
13-08-2009, 11:30 AM
I didnt quote names as I did a quick google search and found one thread. I really dont want to waste hours finding you thousands of names to proove my points. Most people in this thread admire flintoff? Thats a bit obvious as most of them support England ... and to prove this point. http://forum.sportal.com.au/viewthread.aspx?t=59872 A mainly Aussies forum ... most people hate Flintoff. ESPN agree that he is a show off.
Still a cocky player. Who else turns up to a match drunk. Says sorry and does it again. Flintoff.
Catzsy
13-08-2009, 11:55 AM
I didnt quote names as I did a quick google search and found one thread. I really dont want to waste hours finding you thousands of names to proove my points. Most people in this thread admire flintoff? Thats a bit obvious as most of them support England ... and to prove this point. http://forum.sportal.com.au/viewthread.aspx?t=59872 A mainly Aussies forum ... most people hate Flintoff. ESPN agree that he is a show off.
Still a cocky player. Who else turns up to a match drunk. Says sorry and does it again. Flintoff.
Its called 'sporting rivalry', Ksoz. Simple as that. Nothing more nothing less.
I am not sure why you keep focussing on personalities. It doesn't actually have much to do with The Ashes. I think people are more interested in the games than in what he does so my vote is to get back the the Ashes Series. :P
StefanWolves
13-08-2009, 12:17 PM
I didnt quote names as I did a quick google search and found one thread. I really dont want to waste hours finding you thousands of names to proove my points. Most people in this thread admire flintoff? Thats a bit obvious as most of them support England ... and to prove this point. http://forum.sportal.com.au/viewthread.aspx?t=59872 A mainly Aussies forum ... most people hate Flintoff. ESPN agree that he is a show off.
Still a cocky player. Who else turns up to a match drunk. Says sorry and does it again. Flintoff.
Okay, if Flintoff is cocky, so is Dhoni, and Yuvraj, they're the most cockiest players in world cricket, if you think Flintoff is cocky, then look in your own team, it's a team full of big headed idiots.
Quite frankly you just concentrate on his personality just to take the shine off how good he actually is as a player, this gives me the impression that you are jealous that Flintoff isn't Indian.
Cricket players aren't all angels, you know, Indian cricket is different to Australian and English cricket, different styles and different cultures, heard about Andrew Symonds? have we? he made mistakes, a fair bit more than Flintoff, and he paid for it, but not all cricket players are angles, they have to have a life besides cricket to, and if it's rowing a boat in the middle of the night pissed out of his brains then so be it? it's only his life at the end of the day and he can do what he likes with it, and why should you or anyone judge him because of what you see on TV?
Btw, you said earlier that when you explain your opinions on Flintoff, then people mainly agree with you? but you just admitted you google searched it, so in other words your were lying about it? great proof mate, great proof, anything and everything comes up on google searches, just like this:
http://premala.com/?p=709 - an INDIAN website.
Read that, it explains that people know Yuvrah is cocky, but because of the talent he has, he can be cocky, if he wants, this is the same in the Flintoffs case.
I rest my case.
Tintinnabulate
13-08-2009, 04:44 PM
Okay, if Flintoff is cocky, so is Dhoni, and Yuvraj, they're the most cockiest players in world cricket, if you think Flintoff is cocky, then look in your own team, it's a team full of big headed idiots.
Quite frankly you just concentrate on his personality just to take the shine off how good he actually is as a player, this gives me the impression that you are jealous that Flintoff isn't Indian.
Cricket players aren't all angels, you know, Indian cricket is different to Australian and English cricket, different styles and different cultures, heard about Andrew Symonds? have we? he made mistakes, a fair bit more than Flintoff, and he paid for it, but not all cricket players are angles, they have to have a life besides cricket to, and if it's rowing a boat in the middle of the night pissed out of his brains then so be it? it's only his life at the end of the day and he can do what he likes with it, and why should you or anyone judge him because of what you see on TV?
Btw, you said earlier that when you explain your opinions on Flintoff, then people mainly agree with you? but you just admitted you google searched it, so in other words your were lying about it? great proof mate, great proof, anything and everything comes up on google searches, just like this:
http://premala.com/?p=709 - an INDIAN website.
Read that, it explains that people know Yuvrah is cocky, but because of the talent he has, he can be cocky, if he wants, this is the same in the Flintoffs case.
I rest my case.
Bhajji, Sreesanth etc are cocky and bad tempered too. I never said they weren't :S But this is about the Ashes, hence the England team is being discussed not the Indian team. And why would I be jealous that Flintoff isnt Indian rofl? We trashed England in the last test and ODI series 5-0 and 3-0 and have won our last 5 series ... India is doing great at the moment and not getting 50 something and 102 all out in a Test match :). I never asked you to agree with me that Flintoff is cocky and an idiot, we all have our opinion. And my opinion is that he is a total idiot with no respect for others.
I rest my case.
Catzsy
13-08-2009, 04:49 PM
Bhajji, Sreesanth etc are cocky and bad tempered too. I never said they weren't :S But this is about the Ashes, hence the England team is being discussed not the Indian team. And why would I be jealous that Flintoff isnt Indian rofl? We trashed England in the last test and ODI series 5-0 and 3-0 and have won our last 5 series ... India is doing great at the moment and not getting 50 something and 102 all out in a Test match :). I never asked you to agree with me that Flintoff is cocky and an idiot, we all have our opinion. And my opinion is that he is a total idiot with no respect for others.
I rest my case.
I agree on this one - I have no idea why TheWolf would think you were jealous that Flintoff isn't indian. I think you do have enough talented players in the indian team. Now can we get back to the Ashes please, Guys? :D
Tintinnabulate
13-08-2009, 04:52 PM
Collingwood, I reckon, is one of your best players, along with Anderson. Everytime Collingwood is out, I get a huge sigh of relief.
Hecktix
13-08-2009, 07:52 PM
I think the oval will fit well to England's style.
Tintinnabulate
13-08-2009, 08:34 PM
Aussies have rarely won there :( not looking good for them.
Geraint
13-08-2009, 08:37 PM
England hadn't beaten Australia at Lords for decades and they beat them. Records mean nothing, it's how you perform over the 5 days. If Australia can carry on from where they left off, they're in with a good chance. Be interesting to see how the Aussie's line-up. Are they going to go for Hauritz or leave Clarke in?
Immenseman
13-08-2009, 08:38 PM
england r gna win. i said to myself if i get over 500 in the arcade game chopper they will win and i got 600 odd thus they r gna win. fact.
StefanWolves
13-08-2009, 08:52 PM
Haha Jake I remember I got 4000 on that once. XD!
Blinger1
13-08-2009, 09:38 PM
Australia will win just like we did against Ireland oh yes. Jake I noticed you have stoppped saying "1-0" I wonder why...?
Andeeh
14-08-2009, 09:23 PM
I reckon aussies will probably edge the series, but i still have faith in England.
Although are middle order is as weak as it has ever been, only man im comfortable with is Prior and Colly. But i reckon bell we keep his space as he scored 126 in there County championship game today.
Get Bopara out, put key in simple. also if our lower order batted how they did in headingly then thats good news.
England are going to have to make a ballsy change to shape things up but like the good ol' england we play conservative.
Smiddy
14-08-2009, 09:30 PM
What happens with regards to Lee? Since he's fit again and their main bowler, I'd feel a lot more relieved without him in the squad.
Can't believe how wrong I was about North, curses.
Plus would anyone be happy to drop Harmy and Onions, and then bring in Flintoff and Key, leaves us with 4 bowlers and a couple of part-timers (anyone see Cook got a wicket today?) and a strengthened batting line-up.
Tintinnabulate
18-08-2009, 01:07 PM
Bopara dropped. Shame they didnt drop that show off Flintoff.
StefanWolves
18-08-2009, 01:08 PM
Broad might be injured, Harmison could come in though.
Tintinnabulate
18-08-2009, 01:26 PM
Are you saying Broad wont be playing? Excellent news for England. He did them no good. He loves himself. Harmison is better.
-Heart
18-08-2009, 01:33 PM
Are you saying Broad wont be playing? Excellent news for England. He did them no good. He loves himself. Harmison is better.
Gets us some wickets, though.
Tintinnabulate
18-08-2009, 01:36 PM
Thats true. Why was Trescothick originally dropped from the team? Because I havent seen him play in years, I thought he had retired.
StefanWolves
18-08-2009, 02:05 PM
He has retired, he has a mental illness which stops him playing for England.
Tintinnabulate
19-08-2009, 07:50 AM
Ashes bookmaker allegation probed
Cricket chiefs are investigating claims of suspicious bookmaker activity linked to the Ashes series.
The International Cricket Council confirmed it was investigating after receiving a report from the Australian team management.
Cricinfo website reported an Australian player was approached after last month's second Test by a man suspected of having links to illegal bookmaking.
The decisive final Test starts at The Oval, south London, on Thursday.
Cricinfo reported that the unidentified Australian player immediately alerted senior team officials, who notified the ICC's anti-corruption and security unit (ACSU).
An ICC spokesman said: "I can confirm the ACSU has received a report from Australia team management.
"The anti-corruption and security unit of the ICC has developed and implemented a fairly comprehensive education programme for all international players and every single international player has undergone that education and is aware of his responsibilities to report any suspicious activity that he feels he may have been subject to.
"It seems in this case that education has hit home and we have received a report that the ACSU will now investigate."
A detailed story can be found here (http://www.cricinfo.com/engvaus2009/content/current/story/420254.html).
My opinion is that, if the claim is true, the bookmakers were trying to persuade the player to do crap so England have a better chance of winning.
If my thinking is correct, then I really think the player was either Ponting, Johnson, Hilfenhaus or Siddle. Chances of it being a batsmen is low.
Catzsy
19-08-2009, 09:10 AM
A detailed story can be found here (http://www.cricinfo.com/engvaus2009/content/current/story/420254.html).
My opinion is that, if the claim is true, the bookmakers were trying to persuade the player to do crap so England have a better chance of winning.
If my thinking is correct, then I really think the player was either Ponting, Johnson, Hilfenhaus or Siddle. Chances of it being a batsmen is low.
Well there wouldn't be any point in trying to bribe him to play better would there:P This happens all over the world in cricket/sport with illegal bookmakers approaching players. Nothing to do with sport really - all to to do with money and they wouldn't give a rats ass which member in what team they bribed as long as they won their bets. :)
lBlue
19-08-2009, 09:38 AM
A detailed story can be found here (http://www.cricinfo.com/engvaus2009/content/current/story/420254.html).
My opinion is that, if the claim is true, the bookmakers were trying to persuade the player to do crap so England have a better chance of winning.
If my thinking is correct, then I really think the player was either Ponting, Johnson, Hilfenhaus or Siddle. Chances of it being a batsmen is low.
Your thinking is wrong. It'll be the same as football. The guy who got approached would of gone OTT, if he listened to the bloke he would probably of wanted him to do things like "Bowl so many wides at a certain time" or ""Bowl the first no ball at a certain time" etc.
Same as football really, "Give the first throw in at such a time" etc.
They do it like that because one player can't throw a whole game, the others might play outstanding. It's safer for the guys at the top to get the guys at the bottom to make playrs do this.
It was on five live the night City played Barnsley.
Tintinnabulate
19-08-2009, 10:08 AM
Sorry, which part is wrong?
I was just guessing anyway :) Your thinking sounds correct anyway, would make more sense.
lBlue
19-08-2009, 10:09 AM
Sorry, which part is wrong?
I was just guessing anyway :) Your thinking sounds correct anyway, would make more sense.
Not trying to be sarky in my previous post, was just stating how it would most probably of been laid down if the player didn't go OTT.
Tintinnabulate
19-08-2009, 10:15 AM
Not trying to be sarky in my previous post, was just stating how it would most probably of been laid down if the player didn't go OTT.
I know you weren't :) I was just wondering what you meant. You are probably right anyway.
-Heart
20-08-2009, 03:16 PM
Bell gone for 72 :(.
55.2 overs played, England 181-4. We won the toss and Strauss decided to bat. Looked bad early on when Cook went to make it 12-1, he finished on 10 runs. Strauss was the next to go with 55 runs to his name, making it 114-2. Next to fall was Collingwood (I think) for 24, then Bell for 72. Trotters is in and on 4 not out, Prior partnering him but with no runs yet.
Tintinnabulate
20-08-2009, 11:34 PM
Although England are 8 down, 312 isnt that bad of a score. If England can get early wickets then Australia will be in trouble.
Throne Sofa
21-08-2009, 08:51 AM
Although England are 8 down, 312 isnt that bad of a score. If England can get early wickets then Australia will be in trouble.
It really is considering the circumstances. It's the middle order letting us down again with the bat.
-Heart
21-08-2009, 01:43 PM
England bowled out for 332, Australia are 73-0.
What a pile of dog ****.
StefanWolves
21-08-2009, 02:12 PM
89-3, all gone to Broad, what a prospect.
Now come on the rest of the bowlers, try and match Broad, if we do, then we seriously have a chance of winning.
Broads stats;
3 wickets, 8 runs, 16 deliveries (this session, i think) ~ top class.
StefanWolves
21-08-2009, 02:49 PM
Yes! Swann! 108-5! England on top! come on the boys!!!!!!!!! :D
Tintinnabulate
21-08-2009, 02:59 PM
Just happy Flintoff has no wickets. Probably crying in his head that selfish git.
Poor Australia :( Hope they do better in the 2nd innings.
StefanWolves
21-08-2009, 02:59 PM
Just happy Flintoff has no wickets. Probably crying in his head that selfish git.
Poor Australia :( Hope they do better in the 2nd innings.
wow, no praise for england at all?
109-6
Swann again
Tintinnabulate
21-08-2009, 03:06 PM
wow, no praise for england at all?
109-6
Swann again
I did in my previous post.
Geraint
21-08-2009, 03:06 PM
Aussies falling apart. 111-7
StefanWolves
21-08-2009, 03:08 PM
What a spell by Broad, simply awesome............. :D:D
Tintinnabulate
21-08-2009, 03:10 PM
Aussies falling apart. 11-7
haha 11-7 is what England were like in the previous test and against West Indies :P
Aussies just need to avoid follow on now.
StefanWolves
21-08-2009, 03:13 PM
haha 11-7 is what England were like in the previous test and against West Indies :P
Aussies just need to avoid follow on now.
And what relevance does that have to the Ashes? at all?
And it doesn't really matter about the follow on, it won't be enforced, England will bat next and get a reasonable total on the board for Aus to chase on a dreadful batting pitch.
Amazing, they will do well to get much more then 200 now
StefanWolves
21-08-2009, 03:26 PM
131-8 - Swann
Come onnnnn :)
Tarmu
21-08-2009, 04:01 PM
Yessss 143-9, well done Swann :D
I don't think Australia are going to make the 200 mark now, lol.
Yessss 143-9, well done Swann :D
I don't think Australia are going to make the 200 mark now, lol.
even though it wasn't meant to be out but it makes up for the no ball we got out on yesterday :D
Tarmu
21-08-2009, 04:12 PM
even though it wasn't meant to be out but it makes up for the no ball we got out on yesterday :D
It does indeed. But in Cricket you are occasionally going to get these amateur Umpires :P. Leah what's your thoughts on the score for England in the second innings?
Tarmu
21-08-2009, 04:33 PM
Australia are all out for 160!
172 runs behind England :O
Technologic
21-08-2009, 04:38 PM
England are ment like
Tintinnabulate
21-08-2009, 05:09 PM
And what relevance does that have to the Ashes? at all?
And it doesn't really matter about the follow on, it won't be enforced, England will bat next and get a reasonable total on the board for Aus to chase on a dreadful batting pitch.
He made a comment and I simply replied :) Has a relevance to Ashes :P And Australia doing terrible.
Its best not to enforce follow on but it can be good too. But they wouldnt have anyway as its better to let them bat on a crapper pitch.
let it slip at the end but i still think England will win it today has been good for us but could have been better :)
StefanWolves
21-08-2009, 07:31 PM
Lol could have been better? how you work that out.... :P
Tintinnabulate
21-08-2009, 09:36 PM
Australia need early wickets tomorrow and can still easily win.
StefanWolves
21-08-2009, 09:38 PM
Australia need early wickets tomorrow and can still easily win.
just lol
When England get 150-250 runs on the board, and get a 320-400 lead, it's all but game over for Australia, that pitch is like the Sahara desert. :P
Tintinnabulate
21-08-2009, 09:48 PM
Well lead is only 230. If Aussies get quick wickets by repeating the last test match, it's possible.
Browney
21-08-2009, 09:51 PM
Lol could have been better? how you work that out.... :P
cheap england wickets at the end. :eusa_wall
Tintinnabulate
21-08-2009, 10:08 PM
cheap england wickets at the end. :eusa_wall
Their batting order has been failing alot lately.
Geraint
21-08-2009, 10:33 PM
This match is far from over.
StefanWolves
21-08-2009, 10:41 PM
It makes no difference, Australia aren't going to be able to chase down anywhere neer 350 on this pitch, the real winner of this match is the wicket, it's bizarre.
Tintinnabulate
21-08-2009, 11:35 PM
England havent even got 300, let alone 350. It wouldnt surprise me if England are all out even before achieving a lead of 280.
Andeeh
22-08-2009, 12:45 AM
what a sweet display of bowling from broad and swann :)
if anyone can win this test its england
StefanWolves
22-08-2009, 10:03 AM
England havent even got 300, let alone 350. It wouldnt surprise me if England are all out even before achieving a lead of 280.
You're right, but 280 on that pitch is a winning total.
Hecktix
22-08-2009, 11:20 AM
Come on boys!
Brilliant start to play today!
StefanWolves
22-08-2009, 11:38 AM
Really is drifting farer and farer away, if we bat till tea, it's game over.
Hecktix
22-08-2009, 11:57 AM
Strauss out :)
Come on boys!!
StefanWolves
22-08-2009, 12:02 PM
320 ahead, 6 wickets remaining, if we get 130 runs in the next session (fingers crossed) then have a bowl at them in the evening session and get a couple of wickets, in an ideal world anyway.
And LOL at whoever said 'I can see England collapsing for 50 runs this morning' ~ yea, riteeeeeeeee.
Hecktix
22-08-2009, 12:18 PM
320 ahead, 6 wickets remaining, if we get 130 runs in the next session (fingers crossed) then have a bowl at them in the evening session and get a couple of wickets, in an ideal world anyway.
And LOL at whoever said 'I can see England collapsing for 50 runs this morning' ~ yea, riteeeeeeeee.
We dont even need 130 more runs.
They wont make it up on that wicket.
StefanWolves
22-08-2009, 12:20 PM
Yeah but this is Australia, I'd rather we got 450 than risk loosing the test. :P
Hecktix
22-08-2009, 12:27 PM
Yeah but this is Australia, I'd rather we got 450 than risk loosing the test. :P
We'll need a bit of time to get them out though ;)
I dont mind if it gets to like us only having a 10 run advantage on their 9th wicket as long as we've had enough time to bowl them out.
StefanWolves
22-08-2009, 12:29 PM
If we bat until Tea, and then declare or whatever, that's 2 days and 1 session to bowl them out, that's a day more than we should need. :P
Hecktix
22-08-2009, 12:32 PM
If we bat until Tea, and then declare or whatever, that's 2 days and 1 session to bowl them out, that's a day more than we should need. :P
Yeah.
Or we could just keep Matt Prior hitting people in the face... wipe them all out!
I reckon he should have got a 6 for smacking Ponting in the mouth.
StefanWolves
22-08-2009, 12:34 PM
Yeah.
Or we could just keep Matt Prior hitting people in the face... wipe them all out!
I reckon he should have got a 6 for smacking Ponting in the mouth.
I actually laughed when I saw it, then the crowd laughed at clapped, but to be fair to Ponting, he soon got back up and didn't look to bothered, apart from the blood dripping from his lip! :P
Hecktix
22-08-2009, 12:36 PM
I actually laughed when I saw it, then the crowd laughed at clapped, but to be fair to Ponting, he soon got back up and didn't look to bothered, apart from the blood dripping from his lip! :P
Dear Mr Ponting,
I thought i'd let you know how it's going to feel on Monday when we've kicked your sorry backside.
With love,
Matt Prior
StefanWolves
22-08-2009, 12:38 PM
Dear Mr Ponting,
I thought i'd let you know how it's going to feel on Monday when we've kicked your sorry backside.
With love,
Matt Prior
I like it! :)
Technologic
22-08-2009, 04:15 PM
England are doing rather well. How bizarre.
Tintinnabulate
22-08-2009, 04:30 PM
Well I guess the England team really listened hard to Aussies excoach. They know they stood no chance unless they bribed him.
Hecktix
22-08-2009, 04:33 PM
Well I guess the England team really listened hard to Aussies excoach. They know they stood no chance unless they bribed him.
You do make me laugh, we say when the Aussie's play well and we play poor, so...
Kardan
22-08-2009, 04:57 PM
Am I right in saying that it looks fairly positive that we might win? With Australia needing around 540?
Tintinnabulate
22-08-2009, 04:58 PM
You do make me laugh, we say when the Aussie's play well and we play poor, so...
That sentence makes no sense :S
Catzsy
22-08-2009, 04:58 PM
Well I guess the England team really listened hard to Aussies excoach. They know they stood no chance unless they bribed him.
Oh gosh I have heard it all now ksoz. ROFL! :D Nice to see them do well against a such a strong team as the Aussies.
StefanWolves
22-08-2009, 05:04 PM
Wow ksoz, your running out of bad things to say about England now... lmao.
Give credit where credits due for once.
Tintinnabulate
22-08-2009, 05:14 PM
Well they did use the ex-coach? Hence they didnt get beaten 5-0 like last time. The coaches know every secret. Why else pay the excoach unless they were afraid.
Anyway Aussies performance has gone down lately. And I did give credit to England in the first innings :s People only seem to see what they want to see on here.
Catzsy
22-08-2009, 05:51 PM
Well they did use the ex-coach? Hence they didnt get beaten 5-0 like last time. The coaches know every secret. Why else pay the excoach unless they were afraid.
Anyway Aussies performance has gone down lately. And I did give credit to England in the first innings :s People only seem to see what they want to see on here.
Well that is a purely subjective comment and you have to understand this is a mainly UK forum so odds on a lot of members are going to support England. It means they are pro england not necessarily anti anything else. I presume they are doing better this time because they are playing better and yes the coach has to have some credit but it's not the be all and end all of the matter. Teams mature and get better as they do go down as time goes on and members retire. It happens to all teams. Being afraid has nothing to do with it - if he is a good coach they will keep him for matches other than australia. I can't comment on the Aussie's performance going down because I don't know enough about the team but I am sure blinger would be able to give some valid comments in this area.
StefanWolves
22-08-2009, 10:42 PM
Well that is a purely subjective comment and you have to understand this is a mainly UK forum so odds on a lot of members are going to support England. It means they are pro england not necessarily anti anything else. I presume they are doing better this time because they are playing better and yes the coach has to have some credit but it's not the be all and end all of the matter. Teams mature and get better as they do go down as time goes on and members retire. It happens to all teams. Being afraid has nothing to do with it - if he is a good coach they will keep him for matches other than australia. I can't comment on the Aussie's performance going down because I don't know enough about the team but I am sure blinger would be able to give some valid comments in this area.
It's simple, England prefer to be underdogs, it always brings the best out in us. :)
Tintinnabulate
23-08-2009, 08:43 AM
Well that is a purely subjective comment and you have to understand this is a mainly UK forum so odds on a lot of members are going to support England. It means they are pro england not necessarily anti anything else. I presume they are doing better this time because they are playing better and yes the coach has to have some credit but it's not the be all and end all of the matter. Teams mature and get better as they do go down as time goes on and members retire. It happens to all teams. Being afraid has nothing to do with it - if he is a good coach they will keep him for matches other than australia. I can't comment on the Aussie's performance going down because I don't know enough about the team but I am sure blinger would be able to give some valid comments in this area.
You do realise, that when I said "excoach", I meant paying the Australian excoach (the one who was the coach when England got beat 5-0) to tell England all the secrets of the Australian players. I never said members of this forum are "anti-anything".
StefanWolves
23-08-2009, 10:24 AM
You do realise, that when I said "excoach", I meant paying the Australian excoach (the one who was the coach when England got beat 5-0) to tell England all the secrets of the Australian players. I never said members of this forum are "anti-anything".
Who cares? no one.
England have taken two early wickets, Swann and Broad are the men that got them yet again. :)
Catzsy
23-08-2009, 10:36 AM
You do realise, that when I said "excoach", I meant paying the Australian excoach (the one who was the coach when England got beat 5-0) to tell England all the secrets of the Australian players. I never said members of this forum are "anti-anything".
Well, okay but again even if this is true it players have to play the game
the coach does not play it for them. :)
Tintinnabulate
23-08-2009, 10:39 AM
Who cares? no one.
England have taken two early wickets, Swann and Broad are the men that got them yet again. :)
ESPN, and all other cricket teams apart from England ... as it shows how low England can go to try and win a series.
Well, okay but again even if this is true it players have to play the game
the coach does not play it for them. :)
Indeed, but if you find out someones secrets, then that does help a lot, like finding out batsmen's weaknesses. If they didn't pay the excoach, England would not have a clue what will work against the Australian batsmen.
I have said from day 1, its unfair and not how cricket should be played. England ruin crickets name by doing such things, hence they are one of the most disliked countries for cricket. The only reason (and deep down people know its true) the world dislikes Australian cricket team is because they are so damn good.
Anyway good start by them, 2 overs 2 wickets. Would certainly put the Aussies under pressure.
StefanWolves
23-08-2009, 10:42 AM
ESPN, and all other cricket teams apart from England ... as it shows how low England can go to try and win a series.
Aww bless, trying your best to take the shine off Englands performance, bless.
And yeah I totally agree with what Catzsy said. :)
Edited by Catzsy [Forum Super Moderator]: Please do not make remarks that could potentially casue an argument - Thanks.
Tintinnabulate
23-08-2009, 10:45 AM
102 all out and 50 something all out speaks for itself.
StefanWolves
23-08-2009, 10:47 AM
Yeah and no one can deny that, however that was 6 months ago, this is a totally different game, history means nothing, it is what it is, and history stays history.
Tintinnabulate
23-08-2009, 10:49 AM
Yeah and no one can deny that, however that was 6 months ago, this is a totally different game, history means nothing, it is what it is, and history stays history.
I think you have got the concept of timing/dates wrong as 102 all out was on 7 August 2009.
And history doesn't matter if it was a completely different team or around 2 years old.
StefanWolves
23-08-2009, 10:52 AM
I think you have got the concept of timing/dates wrong as 102 all out was within 1 month.
Well seeing as though you're always going on about how the WI beat us, I thought you were on about when they beat us pretty easily.
And yet again, does that score matter? we are on the verge of winning the series, 1 innings is a small space of time compared to a whole series, the score doesn't lie. :)
Stats mean nothing in this game.
Hecktix
23-08-2009, 10:55 AM
I'm gonna be frank.
This thread is about The Ashes 2009.
At the moment England are playing damn well in The Ashes 2009.
End of story.
Catzsy
23-08-2009, 11:00 AM
ESPN, and all other cricket teams apart from England ... as it shows how low England can go to try and win a series.
Indeed, but if you find out someones secrets, then that does help a lot, like finding out batsmen's weaknesses. If they didn't pay the excoach, England would not have a clue what will work against the Australian batsmen.
I have said from day 1, its unfair and not how cricket should be played. England ruin crickets name by doing such things, hence they are one of the most disliked countries for cricket. The only reason (and deep down people know its true) the world dislikes Australian cricket team is because they are so damn good.
Anyway good start by them, 2 overs 2 wickets. Would certainly put the Aussies under pressure.
Seriously don't you think that all countries do it? - they study videos of matches and anything that will help them. It's called sport. There is not a scrap of evidence to back up your theories here. As far as I know the world does not hate any cricket team beyond the normal 'sports rivalry'. Personally
I feel you are starting to sound like a broken down record on this subject and please don't post any more 'evidence' from partisan websites. Just enjoy the game of cricket and may the best team win whether it be England or Australia. All countries and sport teams 'hate' the opposition until after the match whether is be football, rugby or cricket.
StefanWolves
23-08-2009, 11:03 AM
Seriously don't you think that all countries do it? - they study videos of matches and anything that will help them. It's called sport. There is not a scrap of evidence to back up your theories here. As far as I know the world does not hate any cricket team beyond the normal 'sports rivalry'. Personally
I feel you are starting to sound like a broken down record on this subject and please don't post any more 'evidence' from partisan websites. Just enjoy the game of cricket and may the best team win whether it be England or Australia. All countries and sport teams 'hate' the opposition until after the match whether is be football, rugby or cricket.
I'm gonna be frank.
This thread is about The Ashes 2009.
At the moment England are playing damn well in The Ashes 2009.
End of story.
I think that says it all.
Anyway, England need a couple more wickets I feel in this morning session, I think we should bring Collingwood on, the off-cutters that Broad were just bowling were ripping the pitch apart, bring Collingwood on as that is what he does.
Tintinnabulate
23-08-2009, 11:17 AM
I'm gonna be frank.
This thread is about The Ashes 2009.
At the moment England are playing damn well in The Ashes 2009.
End of story.
hence I mentioned 102 all out ...
And yes they study videos, which is pretty obvious :S, but they still don't know every secret.
Hecktix
23-08-2009, 11:18 AM
Australia were 160-all out the other day :/
You clearly just can't admit when England are doing well.
StefanWolves
23-08-2009, 11:20 AM
Australia were 160-all out the other day :/
You clearly just can't admit when England are doing well.
That's the point i'm trying to get across, but he doesn't listen. :P
Tintinnabulate
23-08-2009, 11:22 AM
Australia were 160-all out the other day :/
You clearly just can't admit when England are doing well.
Did you not read my post where at the end of innings 1, I said England did well? And I just said England have done well to get two wickets?
Again proves my point where I said you guys only see what you want to see. You obviously expect me to compliment England in every post I make.
StefanWolves
23-08-2009, 01:37 PM
Ponting ran out! and guess who by? Mr. Flintoff. Oh how we love you.
217-3 ~ come on England! finish em off.
EDIT: ANOTHER RUN OUT. MICHAEL CLARKE GONE FOR 0.
ecstasy
23-08-2009, 02:18 PM
236-5 :)
Catzsy
23-08-2009, 02:27 PM
Did you not read my post where at the end of innings 1, I said England did well? And I just said England have done well to get two wickets?
Again proves my point where I said you guys only see what you want to see. You obviously expect me to compliment England in every post I make.
No we don't. It is just the continual negative assumptions about the England team which have no actual basis in fact and always seem like most unsportsmanlike for a cricket fan. Victory for them now seems likely but one never knows.
Tintinnabulate
23-08-2009, 02:54 PM
On my. Those are are stupid. :\ why take the risk of a run out in a test match when you are doing so well :S.
Andeeh
23-08-2009, 02:56 PM
Super super fred, super super fred, super super fred, super freddie flintoff (8)
did anyone see will beer with shane warne at lunch interval? true sussex breed
come on England 5 more wickets easy peasy :)
Andeeh
23-08-2009, 04:39 PM
9 down harmy on hatrick ASHES IS OURS
Tarmu
23-08-2009, 04:40 PM
Australia 343-9!
Come on England 1 more wicket!
Geraint
23-08-2009, 04:50 PM
England have won the Ashes.
Tarmu
23-08-2009, 04:50 PM
AUSTRALIA ALL OUT FOR 348
Yess, England have won The Ashes!
Andeeh
23-08-2009, 04:50 PM
YESSS ENGLAND ARE 2009 NPOWER ASHES WINNERS :)
Well played from all of our players
Thank You Flintoff
Hecktix
23-08-2009, 06:30 PM
WOOOP WOOOP!
I predicted 2-1 to England in the first page of this thread and I'm pretty proud of them tbh.
Strauss got England man of the series - very well deserved in my opinion. We've had some very low points this summer and Andrew pulled us together, even if he did do it on his own like at Edgebaston?? when he got 161 runs :P
Michael Clark got Austalia man of the series for "his batting" as the chairman of england team said :rolleyes:
I think on the whole England did deserve to win more than Australia :)
Technologic
23-08-2009, 06:35 PM
Australia put up a brilliant fight today and they played very well throughout most of the series but alas, the best team always wins.
Brilliant result! Well done England!
Tintinnabulate
23-08-2009, 09:35 PM
I think Australias stupity of run outs cost them the game. They have been too defensive this series which isnt good.
Well done to England, however Strauss comment on England possibly being the best team in the world soon is a bit unlikely any time soon. I think the current best is South Africa, followed by India then Australia, New Zealand, England, West Indies, Pakistan, Bangladesh.
Cant wait till the ICC Championship 2009 next month.
The Ashes trophy was much much smaller than I expected.
Anyway, I honestly think I would have more respect for the English team if they didn't use Australia's ex-coach.
Geraint
23-08-2009, 09:54 PM
I think Australias stupity of run outs cost them the game. They have been too defensive this series which isnt good.
Well done to England, however Strauss comment on England possibly being the best team in the world soon is a bit unlikely any time soon. I think the current best is South Africa, followed by India then Australia, New Zealand, England, West Indies, Pakistan, Bangladesh.
Cant wait till the ICC Championship 2009 next month.
The Ashes trophy was much much smaller than I expected.
Anyway, I honestly think I would have more respect for the English team if they didn't use Australia's ex-coach.
I don't get why a team would have two run-outs in the final innings of a test they can't lost. They just needed to stay there and not run. The runs would come down bit by bit. The game wasn't going to finish a draw because if Australia had batted for 2 days they would have reached the target. Stupid why Australia had 2 run-outs. If you have any doubt that you can't make it, don't run because you don't need to.
Tintinnabulate
23-08-2009, 10:12 PM
I don't get why a team would have two run-outs in the final innings of a test they can't lost. They just needed to stay there and not run. The runs would come down bit by bit. The game wasn't going to finish a draw because if Australia had batted for 2 days they would have reached the target. Stupid why Australia had 2 run-outs. If you have any doubt that you can't make it, don't run because you don't need to.
Exactly. In test matches they should never take the risk of run outs, especially when they cannot afford to lose wickets.
StefanWolves
23-08-2009, 10:25 PM
Well done England! well deserved win. Strauss, Swann, and Broad are the way forward, along with KP obviously.
May I suggest to MODs, to keep this thread stickied, to make it the Ashes TOUR, which would extend it so it covered the ODIs and T20s? :)
Hecktix
24-08-2009, 02:01 AM
Well done England! well deserved win. Strauss, Swann, and Broad are the way forward, along with KP obviously.
May I suggest to MODs, to keep this thread stickied, to make it the Ashes TOUR, which would extend it so it covered the ODIs and T20s? :)
Noted :)
Blinger1
24-08-2009, 07:13 AM
**** aussies suck. why couldnt it rain for once when england was winning?
StefanWolves
24-08-2009, 07:25 AM
**** aussies suck. why couldnt it rain for once when england was winning?
too bad, it's raining today at the Oval, which makes it even more sweeter.
Tintinnabulate
24-08-2009, 08:53 AM
Overall Australia have been better, but when they have been bad, they have been so bad that its cost them the match.
I think, looking at the teams, Australia stand a much better chance in the ODI's. Then again, both the teams haven't been doing that great lately in ODI's anyway.
Catzsy
24-08-2009, 09:56 AM
Well done England! well deserved win. Strauss, Swann, and Broad are the way forward, along with KP obviously.
May I suggest to MODs, to keep this thread stickied, to make it the Ashes TOUR, which would extend it so it covered the ODIs and T20s? :)
When does that start? Well done England on winning the Ashes. Nice to see a new cap do so well. :)
@blinger - there is always another day and I am sure they will be back to their winning ways.
Blinger1
24-08-2009, 10:08 AM
Australia was def the better team out of the two. Even if we did lose. Look at the statistics, i just hope we kick your arse in the ODI so TheWolf isn't so cocky.
Australia was def the better team out of the two. Even if we did lose. Look at the statistics, i just hope we kick your arse in the ODI so TheWolf isn't so cocky.
Au only won when England had a bad day? When we blowed or batted well we were on top. On paper AU may be better. We'll see how your OD team is
Blinger1
24-08-2009, 10:26 AM
Au only won when England had a bad day?
Oh really? We would have won if the weather didn't screw us over..
When we blowed or batted well we were on top.?
Really, you weren't. Statistics don't lie.. (http://wwos.ninemsn.com.au/cricket/seriesstats.aspx?seriesid=2333&matchid=4&comment=true&livematch=true)
Look at the statistics (the top 3) the only one where England is on top was the batting and that wasn't even impressive.
StefanWolves
24-08-2009, 10:29 AM
Australia was def the better team out of the two. Even if we did lose. Look at the statistics, i just hope we kick your arse in the ODI so TheWolf isn't so cocky.
HAHAHA, stats mean nothing, even your captain said we deserved to win, and your whole team admitted the best team won. :8 :eusa_danc an lol, i'm cocky, all Australians are cocky, the AU Media were even writing England off, because they thought AU were back to 'Business as usual' ~ we showed them alrite. :)
@Catzsy, it starts next Sunday. :)
lol blinger, still trying to get your argument across when it's wrong, who's the team with the ashes? oh england yea.
Andeeh
24-08-2009, 12:20 PM
One of the main things that has won it for England was that first test down at Cardiff. The grit and determination from Colly shed light towards Jimmy and Monty and thus them blocking out those final 11 overs.
England had 2 or 3 good spells with the ball from Flintoff 5WI at Lords and Broads 5WI at the oval which has effectively won us back the ashes.
It has been a great series but lets not get carried away, we need to improve on this unlike 2005. SA coming up and if we win that then we can build on to bigger and better things.
18 months time England will be ready, mark my words.
Edit: i forgot to mention, Well done to the Australia team, gracious in defeat which is a good thing. It will be a shame if Ricky Ponting doesnt come back to England for another Ashes series as the battles have always been intriguing.
So thank you australia for such a good series.
also Good luck for Flintoff with his operation tonight
Tintinnabulate
24-08-2009, 05:24 PM
Australia are much better in ODIs as they can form long partnerships and make runs quickly, which is very important in ODI's. England struggle to get quick wickets, and that will let them down in the ODI's. This England side is just an average side (as agreed by Sky News).
Edit: Just read England got a open-top bus parade when they won the Ashes in 2005. Isn't that a bit over the top :S Its just a normal series, but just hyped up? I guess it was important for them as they rarely win any series.
StefanWolves
24-08-2009, 06:02 PM
Australia are much better in ODIs as they can form long partnerships and make runs quickly, which is very important in ODI's. England struggle to get quick wickets, and that will let them down in the ODI's. This England side is just an average side (as agreed by Sky News).
Edit: Just read England got a open-top bus parade when they won the Ashes in 2005. Isn't that a bit over the top :S Its just a normal series, but just hyped up? I guess it was important for them as they rarely win any series.
Ah, gotta love ya, I love how you exaggerate your views, and try to back them up with 'evidence' that you cannot and do not provide, I've had SkySports NEWS (practically the same as SkyNews) on for a couple of hours, and all they have been saying is that England are a GOOD team with the potential to be the best.
And lol, over-hyped series? I've heard it all, can tell you're not English/Australian, as if you were you wouldn't say that at all.
And lol, hardly win any series at all? yeah... that's why we are now 5th in the world, just behind Australia in 4th? and then Crapindia in 3rd. (I think, or 2nd.)
Browney
24-08-2009, 06:08 PM
Australia are much better in ODIs as they can form long partnerships and make runs quickly, which is very important in ODI's. England struggle to get quick wickets, and that will let them down in the ODI's. This England side is just an average side (as agreed by Sky News).
Edit: Just read England got a open-top bus parade when they won the Ashes in 2005. Isn't that a bit over the top :S Its just a normal series, but just hyped up? I guess it was important for them as they rarely win any series.
You're a funny boy. One breath your saying Stefan is cocky, the next your totally baiting him. Was that last sentence really needed? I suppose he shouldn't bite but yeah.
Ah, gotta love ya, I love how you exaggerate your views, and try to back them up with 'evidence' that you cannot and do not provide, I've had SkySports NEWS (practically the same as SkyNews) on for a couple of hours, and all they have been saying is that England are a GOOD team with the potential to be the best.
And lol, over-hyped series? I've heard it all, can tell you're not English/Australian, as if you were you wouldn't say that at all.
To be fair, SSN are a UK news channel. Everyone's subject to some bias.
But yeah, you're right, if Ksoz knew the history between the two countries, nevermind teams, he'd understand the series gets everything it deserves. Besides, the open top bus was 2005, when we won it for the first time in like 20 years. Now it's just regular occurence. :eusa_danc
StefanWolves
24-08-2009, 06:12 PM
You're a funny boy. One breath your saying Stefan is cocky, the next your totally baiting him. Was that last sentence really needed? I suppose he shouldn't bite but yeah.
To be fair, SSN are a UK news channel. Everyone's subject to some bias.
But yeah, you're right, if Ksoz knew the history between the two countries, nevermind teams, he'd understand the series gets everything it deserves. Besides, the open top bus was 2005, when we won it for the first time in like 20 years. Now it's just regular occurence. :eusa_danc
At last, someone see's it from my point of view.
Sticking up for me! ily baby x!!!11
Blinger Au should have the skill to beat us in the tests where the weather didn't alter play?
SSN today there had people from Au on saying "The best team won"
Edit: didn't look at other pages lol should have quoted..
Tintinnabulate
24-08-2009, 07:44 PM
Australia will win the ODI's :)
And they said "The current England team are average but they still won." in the morning ...
And yeah India are crap (roll) hence they have won their last 5 series and white washed England and are the second best in the world.
StefanWolves
24-08-2009, 09:57 PM
Australia will win the ODI's :)
And they said "The current England team are average but they still won." in the morning ...
And yeah India are crap (roll) hence they have won their last 5 series and white washed England and are the second best in the world.
COUGH T20 WORLD CUP**
Immenseman
24-08-2009, 10:02 PM
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, winners!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
W00000000000t
Tintinnabulate
24-08-2009, 10:41 PM
COUGH T20 WORLD CUP**
Thats not a series and hence I said ODIs and Tests ...
Geraint
24-08-2009, 10:51 PM
awwww poor ksoz just saw the team he hates win the ashes so is moaning. awwwww. :'(
StefanWolves
24-08-2009, 11:05 PM
awwww poor ksoz just saw the team he hates win the ashes so is moaning. awwwww. :'(
great isn't it
i know ksoz, but what makes it sweeter was that you were the best in the world at T20s, we beat you, AUS were the best at test matches, we beat them.
i feel good, duh dum dum dum dum dum.
Tintinnabulate
24-08-2009, 11:05 PM
awwww poor ksoz just saw the team he hates win the ashes so is moaning. awwwww. :'(
Haha indeed :D :( I really wanted England to lose. I even want the mto lose against Pakistan!
Immenseman
24-08-2009, 11:06 PM
wicked win
#1 soon x
Tintinnabulate
24-08-2009, 11:39 PM
great isn't it
i know ksoz, but what makes it sweeter was that you were the best in the world at T20s, we beat you, AUS were the best at test matches, we beat them.
i feel good, duh dum dum dum dum dum.
We weren't the best in the world? Winning the world cup doesnt make you best in the world ... everyone knows that.
And we beat you twice before? woop woop?
StefanWolves
24-08-2009, 11:56 PM
We weren't the best in the world? Winning the world cup doesnt make you best in the world ... everyone knows that.
And we beat you twice before? woop woop?
if you're t20 world champions it kinda means that you are the best team at t20, EVERYONE NOSE DAT!!!!!!!!!
Tintinnabulate
24-08-2009, 11:59 PM
if you're t20 world champions it kinda means that you are the best team at t20, EVERYONE NOSE DAT!!!!!!!!!
:rolleyes: Even if it did mean that, doesnt mean you should win every game ...
StefanWolves
25-08-2009, 12:04 AM
:rolleyes: Even if it did mean that, doesnt mean you should win every game ...
did i say dat dow no i dai
r said you were da best at t20, and we beat u.
Blinger1
25-08-2009, 12:12 AM
did i say dat dow no i dai
r said you were da best at t20, and we beat u.
whoop de do, england won one T20 game :O!!!!!!!!!!!!! CALL IN THE MEDIA QUICK HOLY CRAP.
Post edited by iAdam (Forum Moderator); Please do not post to cause arguments.
Tintinnabulate
25-08-2009, 12:16 AM
whoop de do, england won one T20 game :O!!!!!!!!!!!!! CALL IN THE MEDIA QUICK HOLY CRAP.
rofl!!!! they won one series FINALLY. need a parade tbh.
Blinger1
25-08-2009, 12:20 AM
they do, they have only had it twice for the last 20 years :'(
edit: here is the parade!!
*could be offensive?*
parade
(http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2006/02/02/mardigras_narrowweb__300x460,0.jpg)
StefanWolves
25-08-2009, 12:31 AM
whoop de do, england won one T20 game :O!!!!!!!!!!!!! CALL IN THE MEDIA QUICK HOLY CRAP.
do you realize how silly you look sayin that
ahh the ashes are ours, lovely.
night ladies xx
Blinger1
25-08-2009, 12:37 AM
Dont sleep too long, you must get ready for your parade:
http://www.insidemardigras.com/images/2008/2008MardiGrasCalendarNov1.jpg
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/06/MGD08ToastPurpleGreenGoldDrums.jpg
and the person on the left looks like a british person too!
Tintinnabulate
25-08-2009, 07:43 AM
England dont stand a chance of winning the ODI's. England arent great are forming partnerships who can get alot of runs very quickly, apart from Collingwood.
This is why they have no money for a parade this year ...
England Team Meeting before the Ashes: Hello team and Flintoff, oh and Broad, we haven't won a series in ages. How can we win this?
Collingwood: We could get rid of our crap players and actually try and be good? And not be cocky ...
A different player: OR we could pay the Australian ex-coach to tell us their secrets
Team: That's an excellent idea! That's probably our best chance, by paying to get their secrets.
Management: We have £xxx,xxx money. If we pay him all of that we wont have any money left to drink non stop :( and have a parade and coming in to the ODIs drunk!
Flintoff: I cant go into the match drunk? :( Man that sucks.
Browney
25-08-2009, 08:00 AM
Since 2005, Flintoff has had 2 more sons born and he is 4 years older, hes now a 31 year old man, not a mid 20's lad. He's said himself, hes older, and supposedly wiser.
Tintinnabulate
25-08-2009, 08:01 AM
People like Flintoff never change.
StefanWolves
25-08-2009, 11:20 AM
People like Flintoff never change.
lol people like you never change with your persistent negative comments.
and mods, are you gonna change it to the Ashes tour or whattt? :P
Catzsy
25-08-2009, 03:35 PM
England dont stand a chance of winning the ODI's. England arent great are forming partnerships who can get alot of runs very quickly, apart from Collingwood.
This is why they have no money for a parade this year ...
England Team Meeting before the Ashes: Hello team and Flintoff, oh and Broad, we haven't won a series in ages. How can we win this?
Collingwood: We could get rid of our crap players and actually try and be good? And not be cocky ...
A different player: OR we could pay the Australian ex-coach to tell us their secrets
Team: That's an excellent idea! That's probably our best chance, by paying to get their secrets.
Management: We have £xxx,xxx money. If we pay him all of that we wont have any money left to drink non stop :( and have a parade and coming in to the ODIs drunk!
Flintoff: I cant go into the match drunk? :( Man that sucks.
Nice bit of romanticised regurgitated fiction again, I see. :P
Good luck to both teams with the one day matches. I am not going to bet against the Aussie here. They will be fired up after the Ashes defeat.
Immenseman
25-08-2009, 04:37 PM
we are the championssssssss (8)
Tintinnabulate
25-08-2009, 10:53 PM
we are the championssssssss (8)
Winning a series doesn't make you champions :)
StefanWolves
25-08-2009, 11:03 PM
It does cause were the champions of the ashes. dur.
Tintinnabulate
25-08-2009, 11:54 PM
A series with a name.
Geraint
26-08-2009, 12:01 AM
Winning a series doesn't make you champions :)
losing in the final doesn't either. ;)
Tintinnabulate
26-08-2009, 12:21 AM
losing in the final doesn't either. ;)
Never said Australia are the champions :)
South Africa are the best team in the world.
StefanWolves
26-08-2009, 11:15 AM
Never said Australia are the champions :)
South Africa are the best team in the world.
:eusa_clap:eusa_clap:eusa_clap:eusa_clap
India are third, joint second though.
Tintinnabulate
26-08-2009, 05:37 PM
:eusa_clap:eusa_clap:eusa_clap:eusa_clap
India are third, joint second though.
Never said India is the best :) Like I said, you guys only seem to see what you want to see.
StefanWolves
26-08-2009, 09:19 PM
Never said India is the best :) Like I said, you guys only seem to see what you want to see.
Where have I said that you said India were the best? I think you're the one who is only reading what he wants to read.
Catzsy
27-08-2009, 08:50 AM
Never said India is the best :) Like I said, you guys only seem to see what you want to see.
Where have I said that you said India were the best? I think you're the one who is only reading what he wants to read.
Agree with TheWolf here - I can't find anywhere that he has said Ksoz said that India were the best so lets look forward to the one dayers.
Tintinnabulate
27-08-2009, 10:12 AM
Agree with TheWolf here - I can't find anywhere that he has said Ksoz said that India were the best so lets look forward to the one dayers.
When you quote someone and say something like what he said, I think its pretty obvious what he meant? Its common sense ... :S
Anyway rofl!! England are 6/2 against Ireland. England are back to their quality form ... which is that they are crap :)
Tintinnabulate
27-08-2009, 10:30 AM
..and its started raining I'm afraid. Umpires are having a chat and it looks like they're going to come off. Hopefully this will be a short shower and not the start of the heavier rain that is forecast for late this afternoon..
Always rains when England are doing crap. No wonder it always rains here.
Browney
27-08-2009, 01:33 PM
No one bite, hes fishing for the reaction. Let him be. There has to be people who are wrong, to make the smart people feel special. :eusa_danc
StefanWolves
27-08-2009, 03:28 PM
Always rains when England are doing crap. No wonder it always rains here.
Great isn't it? it's like an extra man! too bad it never rains in India, then they would be the best. :(
-cough- T20 World cup -cough-
Catzsy
27-08-2009, 04:39 PM
When you quote someone and say something like what he said, I think its pretty obvious what he meant? Its common sense ... :S
Anyway rofl!! England are 6/2 against Ireland. England are back to their quality form ... which is that they are crap :)
No it isn't - you assume a lot :S How can any team who have just beaten Australia be 'crap' - fgs. I am not surprised others get upset because you have an inflexible extremely negative attitude when it comes to the English Cricket team - its like you have concrete boots on. Give credit where it's due and make less sweeping negative statements about one subject and I am sure your comments will be welcomed by everyone.
England 203/9 (50 ov)
Ireland 7/0 (1.1/20 ov)
at this moment.
Andeeh
27-08-2009, 07:25 PM
No it isn't - you assume a lot :S How can any team who have just beaten Australia be 'crap' - fgs. I am not surprised others get upset because you have an inflexible extremely negative attitude when it comes to the English Cricket team - its like you have concrete boots on. Give credit where it's due and make less sweeping negative statements about one subject and I am sure your comments will be welcomed by everyone.
England 203/9 (50 ov)
Ireland 7/0 (1.1/20 ov)
at this moment.
we only just beat ireland today, terrific bowling but Denly the only man to make a signifcant score (Luke Wright also did a nice little contribution) is quite scary considering Ireland are a micky mouse team.
Terrific bowling from England though by Shah and Bresnan.
We need to shape up significantly if we want to beat Australia in the ODI series.
Tintinnabulate
28-08-2009, 07:20 AM
No it isn't - you assume a lot :S How can any team who have just beaten Australia be 'crap' - fgs. I am not surprised others get upset because you have an inflexible extremely negative attitude when it comes to the English Cricket team - its like you have concrete boots on. Give credit where it's due and make less sweeping negative statements about one subject and I am sure your comments will be welcomed by everyone.
England 203/9 (50 ov)
Ireland 7/0 (1.1/20 ov)
at this moment.
Thanks for proving my point of you guys only seeing what you want to see, because as I have said it about 8 times now, I HAVE GIVEN CREDIT TO ENGLAND. Oh my, you guys never read do you?
Besides Catzsy, beating Australia isnt like WOW as it used to be, they aren't as good as they used to be. Any team who beats South Africa deserves respect.
I like how TheWolf only takes about one thing - T20 World Cup as India lost 2 games there. You guys didnt even win it or qualify rofl :S On the otherhand, we have won one and have hit you for 6 6's, now that's something to boast about. THANK YOU FLINTOF FOR BEING AN IDIOT AND WINDING UP THE SINGH!
I am not surprised others get upset because you have an inflexible extremely negative attitude when it comes to the Indian and Australian Cricket team - its like you have concrete boots on. Give credit where it's due and make less sweeping negative statements about one subject and I am sure your comments will be welcomed by everyone.
Anyway damn the rain and Ireland requiring a higher run rate than England to win :\ or they would have won.
You just about beat Ireland, and you guys think you can beat Australia? Keep dreaming.
Blinger1
28-08-2009, 07:25 AM
No it isn't - you assume a lot :S How can any team who have just beaten Australia be 'crap' - fgs.
Because Australia has had a bad series :S
And we are starting from scratch imo. we have lost our best players like Haydon, Gilchrist, Warne, McGrath, Langer... Its a baby team.
Tintinnabulate
28-08-2009, 07:27 AM
Yeppp and England just about won the series. Anyway read the bold bit on my above post :)
Blinger1
28-08-2009, 07:33 AM
Oh yes, also because England are top **** atm, just look at the current ICC standings.. (these are from 1st to 4th)
ODI: South Africa, India, Australia, England.
Test: South Africa, Sri Lanka, India, Australia (and then England).
Winning one series does not instantly make you top ****.. sorry British citizens.
Tintinnabulate
28-08-2009, 07:35 AM
India had to win around 5 series in a row to go from third to second, not one series. Its not easy. We beat Australia too, don't see us boasting? Australia trashed you 5-0 last time ...
So England will have to do amazingly well over the next few series to get better rankings.
Blinger1
28-08-2009, 07:38 AM
Australia trashed you 5-0 last time ...
dat woz difernt m8 klearlee!111
Everytime I have brought this argument up its the same response, "it woz an unfair seriez" so maybe the same argument can be used for us?
Tintinnabulate
28-08-2009, 07:41 AM
dat woz difernt m8 klearlee!111
Everytime I have brought this argument up its the same response, "it woz an unfair seriez" so maybe the same argument can be used for us?
unfair?!?! wth why :S was it because it was in Australia :rolleyes: I heard Australians told the pitch to work in their favor. MATCH FIXING!!!
Blinger1
28-08-2009, 07:46 AM
yes and we bribed the weather to stay sunny!!!
Wait, isn't it normal for the sun to shine in summer!?
Tintinnabulate
28-08-2009, 07:47 AM
yes and we bribed the weather to stay sunny!!!
Wait, isn't it normal for the sun to shine in summer!?
Not here :( Always rains, well in Manchester anyway :@ I am actually wondering if I should go watch the T20 on Sunday, but it says its going to be heavy rain :| Might go to the ODI one instead on 20th September.
Blinger1
28-08-2009, 07:51 AM
Trust England to rain in the summer that's why I love the adds we had about their cricket team. They are crap because they can't train thanks to the rain!!
Tintinnabulate
28-08-2009, 07:55 AM
hahahah thats quite funny.
StefanWolves
28-08-2009, 08:11 AM
Trust England to rain in the summer that's why I love the adds we had about their cricket team. They are crap because they can't train thanks to the rain!!
hahah hilarious, seeing as though we beat you... 2-1, hilarious, just proof, cocky Aussies always get their ass bitten.
Blinger1
28-08-2009, 08:15 AM
And new Zealand was because there are too many sheep and everywhere is on a hill... that seems about right too!!
Tintinnabulate
28-08-2009, 08:22 AM
hahah hilarious, seeing as though we beat you... 2-1, hilarious, just proof, cocky Aussies always get their ass bitten.
Australia would have won the the first test if it wasn't for the rain, meaning you wouldn't have got the Ashes. Point proven.
*Removed*
Edited by Catzsy [Forum Super Moderator]: Please do not say inappropriate things about other members. Thanks.
iAdam
28-08-2009, 09:17 AM
Guys, come on now, it's been long enough, stop arguing for god sake.
StefanWolves
28-08-2009, 02:56 PM
Australia would have won the the first test if it wasn't for the rain, meaning you wouldn't have got the Ashes. Point proven.
Again, you're talking about things that never happened, which you always seem to do.
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/archive/01468/andrew-strauss_1468314c.jpg
point proven.
For even more proof, see my sig.
We love you Flintoffff we dooo.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.