FTAO in spam

[Stephen]

Can you make a prefix for it in spam please

[Aidenn]

In my opinion theres no need for it,

If you want to attract someones attention why not make it easier and contact them via Private Message like a normal person, rather then making it visible to the whole forum.

[Tintinnabulate]

Can you make a prefix for it in spam please

Not really needed. Its only started happening this month and the title is fine.

[Recursion]

Also isn't it FAO...?

[Stephen]

tbh I'm just trollololoing because of the hate ftao threads in spam x

Don't tell me off for it tho mods plz cos it only counts as trolling if you added it :(

[Richie]

THIS!!


i egg gree stephen!

[xxMATTGxx]

tbh I'm just trollololoing because of the hate ftao threads in spam x

Don't tell me off for it tho mods plz cos it only counts as trolling if you added it :(

So you are basically admitting this thread is pointless?

[Martin]

I don't see the need for it. It's only a recent thing that it's become so widely used, and I don't think it hurts too much in the spam forum having threads with "ftao" in the title. The discussions within the threads are mainly typical of what you would find in spam anyway so it's really just the title that's different. A prefix would be just the same as manually typing it into the title should the thread creator want to. I'm guessing it will fade out after a while anyway. :D

[Stephen]

So you are basically admitting this thread is pointless?

no. I'm saying I'm not taking it too seriously. I started it cos I saw the hate ftao threads in spam so it could be seen as trolling if you added it but also cos there are loads of threads in spam so far with FTAO. Seeing as it's spam I don't see the reason of not adding it because of the excuse of "PRIVATE MESSAGE THEM FGS" as people start discussions over the FTAO threads

[xxMATTGxx]

Well ok. But we don't like adding prefixes for the sake of it and like you have said it is "Spam". It really isn't an issue; just a lot of people have been doing these threads recently. I'm sure it will calm down over the next few days.

[Stephen]

kk thanks

[Tintinnabulate]

Whats wrong with just putting FTAO: at the start? :S

[Stephen]

Thread is trolling. Over. It

[Black_Apalachi]

Please tell me this suggestion isn't being taken seriously.

[AgnesIO]

Also its FAO

[hah]

for attention of
for the attention of


ftao sounds better

/discuss

[AgnesIO]

FAO is how it's been for years :P

FAO sounds better than FTAO - FAO 'flows' better :P

[Blinger$]

Whats wrong with just putting FTAO: at the start? :S


Please tell me this suggestion isn't being taken seriously.

Did you actually read the thread? He has admitted to not wanting it. My god

[Tintinnabulate]

Did you actually read the thread? He has admitted to not wanting it. My god

It was for those who might have wanted it. If he didnt want it, why post it. Its pointless spam.

[AgnesIO]

Exactly. If he has admitted this was just a laugh why the **** is the thread still open.