Quote:
Originally Posted by Fomas
Waste of a life? OK so the obese are a bit too much and admitadley i wouldnt date a girl the size of a russian tank, but a waste of a life? Ouch. Im no where near healthy so that hit kinda hard! :(
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fomas
Waste of a life? OK so the obese are a bit too much and admitadley i wouldnt date a girl the size of a russian tank, but a waste of a life? Ouch. Im no where near healthy so that hit kinda hard! :(
I dont find that hard to believe comming from the person who would like to bang...Quote:
Originally Posted by Topjak
and I dont see why the other person thinks obease people are a waste of life.Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyingJesus
Some of them are born like it and cant do much about it.
We are talking about stuff that impresses boys not why fat people dont derserve to live.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BL!NKEY
HAHA! Touche man. That was good. Harsh but good.
I lol'dQuote:
Originally Posted by BL!NKEY
o.0 Yes, Relationships obviosly work best between people who find each other repulcive and hate each others guts, I can definilty see how realistic you are...Quote:
Originally Posted by Topjak
Unluckly we live in somthing called reality, And flyingjesus is makeing a very true claim, people tend to fall in love with people they find both attractive and like personalty wize.
The factor you seem to be missing is the relativity of attracivness. What one person sees as ugly another person can see a beauty. Just becuse you think someones girlfriend is ugly, doesnt mean they dont cair about looks, it just means they probably dont have the same opinion as you, and do in fact find them attracive "/
Well the species as have most other species have been survive exsacty BECUSE of judging that for millions of years now, so learn your facts mate.Quote:
Originally Posted by Topjak
What is deemed attrracive comes from how we select a sutable mate, We select (even if non consuily) based on a number of factors all attrubuted to be attractive since that will produce better ospring, and hence futher your genetics... its how eveolition works and we came from a bactera to where we are now, i realy dont think you can attack this basis...
Good looking = relative. Your not some super powered immortal being, you dont personaly get to define the world for all existing humans, A person can be but ugly to you, and the definition of beuety to someone else...Quote:
you need a connection with that person not just an attaction, this can be built up over years and years, to say that I personally wouldnt 'bang' (which btw is a poor word to use from you 6 year old vocabulary) doenst mean nobody would, dont get me wrong there are obviously people out there i won't be attracted to thats human nature, but to say they have to be good looking or they can get lost is absurd!
Obviosly personality is a factor, and is PART of what can make someone attractive, Phiscal attraciveness is still important though on top of this, Saying its just the one factor is compleaty untrue "/Quote:
No healthy relationship can be based on looks FACT a helathy relationship can be built on personality, i know this as i'm no Brad Pitt, i know this, yet i've known many people over the years who have found me attractive BECAUSE OF MY PERSONALITY, example one: Check my thread in other pictures, its of a girl ho used to have a huge crush on me, she isnt the best lookign girl on earth, but niether is she ugly and she has never been single for the 5 years i've known her, thats because she has a great sense of humour and bubbly attitude and great personality.
And i take it youve had your girlfriend since you were 12 then? or was that last comment just a hot steaming pile of bull?Quote:
I say to you, bring me a relationship that has lasted 4 years based on lust?
I mean, I think its pointless not being in control of your own body.Quote:
Originally Posted by BL!NKEY
I mean if its an illness or something like that im not gonna have a go at them.
And i didnt say fat anyway, i said people that dont look after themselves.
I mean looks or w.e
And they complain when they get no one.
There own fault.
Not ours,
Ok last post before i hit pillow.Quote:
Originally Posted by entor M
First off dont join the thread and getall mucho and policman on us. This is a DEBATE not an argument, to start throwing some os those phrases was unnecessary now chill.
Now lets me see if i have energy to cut this down *sigh*
At no point did i say rekationship work between those who hate each other, in fact i said the opposite so quit talking out you secondary mouth (Good filter avoiding huh?)
And yes there are points of Jesus' that are valid but i also disagree with others. You have me on the point that beauty differs between different people so thats 1 point you.
For you to say im arrogant to define everything by MY ideas is just a downright sucker punch. No need for it and ill address it no further.
I also agree with the factors part, but in my reality, as i am clearly not in yours is that personality is a larger factor than looks.
I also never said that i am in a 4 year relationship, i had previously stated my friend hasnt been single in the 5 years ive known her can you put 2 and 2 together or do you still need help?
:)
No I'm not.Quote:
Originally Posted by Topjak
So if you're in a relationship with someone who you fancy, it can only be lust? I think you need to rethink your definitions, and also reread what I posted: I never claimed that relationships went by looks alone.Quote:
Originally Posted by Topjak
There's a filter on here, hence the "6 year old vocabulary".Quote:
Originally Posted by Topjak
No it isn't. I have very high standards.Quote:
Originally Posted by Topjak
Yes it can. Lust can grow into love, just like love can dissolve into lust.Quote:
Originally Posted by Topjak
Yes it CAN, but not just personality, which is what I've been getting at.Quote:
Originally Posted by Topjak
Fair enough, I never claimed that personality had no part in it (in fact I've been saying that you need both) but these people will have also had some physical attraction to you. You don't have to be the best looking guy to be seen as attractive to others, but if they liked your personality and not your looks at all you'd still just be a friend.Quote:
Originally Posted by Topjak
Don't call them ho's mate, that's not very nice.Quote:
Originally Posted by Topjak
You really don't get what I'm on about.Quote:
Originally Posted by Topjak
Quote:
Originally Posted by Topjak
I say to you, bring me a relationship that has lasted 4 years with no lust whatsoever.
Each to their own.Quote:
Originally Posted by Topjak
Soz m8, contradictionQuote:
Originally Posted by TopjakFirst off dont join the thread and getall mucho and policman on us. This is a DEBATE not an argument, to start throwing some os those phrases was unnecessary now chill.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Topjak
mucho? policeman? o.0 i think i can probably conclude here you need sleep more than you think you do...Quote:
Originally Posted by Topjak
No, but you said exsactly the same thing about attractiveness. i then enphised the exsample to get the point accross that id to people dont like each other it wont work...This applys directly to phisical attraction as well.Quote:
At no point did i say rekationship work between those who hate each other, in fact i said the opposite so quit talking out you secondary mouth
Nice fallisy to throw in there, the fact it implys your arrigant obviosly means the point made is false "/ The arguments still just as valid wether its targeted at you or not.Quote:
And yes there are points of Jesus' that are valid but i also disagree with others. You have me on the point that beauty differs between different people so thats 1 point you.
For you to say im arrogant to define everything by MY ideas is just a downright sucker punch. No need for it and ill address it no further.
Heres again an issuse with attractivness. Since in accordance with its relativity, You will find them attractive, dispite whether you did or did not at first. If someone is friendly your mind will like them more, and hence pick up on things you find attracive about them, if not, its the oppsit "/Quote:
I also agree with the factors part, but in my reality, as i am clearly not in yours is that personality is a larger factor than looks.
To go with that, due to the way where wired up, simple facal exspressions also make a massive differnce in how attractive people seem, people that smile alot, even if not steriotypicaly beutiful will get alot more attention than those who dont, and it is an issue of attractivness "/
You start by trying to make out im useing adhomin falisys, the you end by doing exsactly that...Quote:
I also never said that i am in a 4 year relationship, i had previously stated my friend hasnt been single in the 5 years ive known her can you put 2 and 2 together or do you still need help?
:)
You asked for a 4 year exsample of a lust based relationship? you dont have exsperince of a 4 year love based relationship to back your first clame up with.
Lust and love are easly confused, since your not phycic you cant know for sure about there relationship "/
Anyway, your arguments even more flawed than it started with. No one. No one AT ALL. Has claimed you can have a proper relationship based on love. Theyve claimed Love is caused by BOTH personality AND attractivness in the phiscial sence. Not just by personality, as you seem to be overarchingly claiming it is.
Hell its not even a relationship in that sence withoiut love, so your lust based one contradicts itself before it starts.. Maybe you should start with adding 1 and 1 together?
1. 'Bang' when used by 6 year olds is when a firework goes off, what 6 year olds have you met that use the word 'bang' as a sexual term?Quote:
Originally Posted by Topjak
2. Why disagree with the word THEN use the darn thing so immaturely?
3. Your future relationships will be extremely strained if you wish to have relations with a picture of various different body parts put together!
If he still doesn't get what I'm on about I think he should be sanctioned.