Whats impresses lads?

[Topjak]

Sorry, I'm a loser for having a realistic approach to women? I said that I wouldn't date a *****r, and there's a good reason for that. If there is no sexual attraction between two people then there can be no long-lasting relationship. If I meet a girl who's a lovely person but isn't good looking then she can be my friend, but I will never think of her as anything more, because I will not be attracted to her. Similarly, if there's a girl who's obnoxious but gorgeous, she will be in my thoughts on lonely nights but I will likely never get close to her, and because of her being horrible I wouldn't want to.

I don't see how my last post brands me a "loser" of any "rate", as I simply stated that for a girl to have a chance with me she has to be ranking high in the looks department and have a good personality as well. Looks are simply higher in my eyes because you see looks first. You possibly see personality first if you're a net dater, but I'm not.

Realistic?! Are you kidding?! Not all of us males act like jerks btw. Some of us are still decent, we dont treat women like meat we treat thjem with respect like HUMANS.
To say 'realistic' is an insult to all those who are insecure about themselves!

And to then go on and tell us they need to score high in both for a relationship with you just shows how chauvinistic you truley are.

[FlyingJesus]

Realistic?! Are you kidding?! Not all of us males act like jerks btw. Some of us are still decent, we dont treat women like meat we treat thjem with respect like HUMANS.
To say 'realistic' is an insult to all those who are insecure about themselves!

And to then go on and tell us they need to score high in both for a relationship with you just shows how chauvinistic you truley are.

Yes I'm sexist, I don't deny it. That however has nothing to do with this debate. What you don't seem to get is that an adult, long-term relationship does rely quite largely on sex. I don't know how old you are, but one day it might happen to you, and I'm sure you wouldn't want to do it with someone who looks like she got mistaken for the pig that she is at the local slaughterhouse and got her face even more mashed up.


If you met this person and found that they had the most fantastic personality and were a right laugh, would you seriously bang them? I doubt it. You might well be her friend, maybe even a close friend, but you wouldn't want to get involved. I just said all this to a girl friend of mine (not girlfriend, girl friend) and she agrees with me, because she has a brain. I repeat:

If you are not attracted to someone, you cannot have a sexual relationship with them.

[Axel]

Sorry Topjak, but Jesus got it in one.

[Fomas]

For me a girl has to be good looking, curvy (No skinny please)
And has to have an amazing perosonality, really bubbly and adventurous, and a girl who is themself no matter who they are with.

So dont change for anyone.
And jesus has got a good point i couldnt go out with someone really bad looking, but looks arent everything me and my gf arent going great and she is stunning.

[FlyingJesus]

For me a girl has to be good looking, curvy (No skinny please)
And has to have an amazing perosonality, really bubbly and adventurous, and a girl who is themself no matter who they are with.

So dont change for anyone.
And jesus has got a good point i couldnt go out with someone really bad looking, but looks arent everything me and my gf arent going great and she is stunning.

wots her numba m8?

[Topjak]

Yes I'm sexist, I don't deny it. That however has nothing to do with this debate. What you don't seem to get is that an adult, long-term relationship does rely quite largely on sex. I don't know how old you are, but one day it might happen to you, and I'm sure you wouldn't want to do it with someone who looks like she got mistaken for the pig that she is at the local slaughterhouse and got her face even more mashed up.


If you met this person and found that they had the most fantastic personality and were a right laugh, would you seriously bang them? I doubt it. You might well be her friend, maybe even a close friend, but you wouldn't want to get involved. I just said all this to a girl friend of mine (not girlfriend, girl friend) and she agrees with me, because she has a brain. I repeat:

If you are not attracted to someone, you cannot have a sexual relationship with them.

WRONG

What you're describing is a LUSTFUL realtionship, i however am talking about LOVE. Basing love on looks is not possible, you need a connection with that person not just an attaction, this can be built up over years and years, to say that I personally wouldnt 'bang' (which btw is a poor word to use from you 6 year old vocabulary) doenst mean nobody would, dont get me wrong there are obviously people out there i won't be attracted to thats human nature, but to say they have to be good looking or they can get lost is absurd! No healthy relationship can be based on looks FACT a helathy relationship can be built on personality, i know this as i'm no Brad Pitt, i know this, yet i've known many people over the years who have found me attractive BECAUSE OF MY PERSONALITY, example one: Check my thread in other pictures, its of a girl ho used to have a huge crush on me, she isnt the best lookign girl on earth, but niether is she ugly and she has never been single for the 5 years i've known her, thats because she has a great sense of humour and bubbly attitude and great personality.

I say to you, bring me a relationship that has lasted 4 years based on lust?

PS: I'm also 16, and i would so bang the bird in that pic. Shes hawt *drools*

[Fomas]

wots her numba m8?

Rofl bugger off

[BL!NKEY]

I don't see how everyone can put personality as first.

I know people have different opinions but your first impression is usually looks.

I would prefer a slim girl over an average girl. I would even prefer a really skinny girl over a fat girl. That is just me, not saying that is what everyone should think.

Personality is great and needed for a relationship.

But if a smoking hot girl had no personality, they would appeal to me way more then a ugly girl who is nice and fun to be around.

I know it makes boys look bad but It is what i feel.

Humans are genetically inclined to go for the fittest girl so their children will live and have a higher chance of passing on the genes. That is how the universe works. Looks have to do with health. If a girl eats McDonalds all the time and doesn't take care of the acne on her face then she is less attractive.

PS: I'm also 16, and i would so bang the bird in that pic. Shes hawt *drools*

If your standards are that low then I can see why you think the way you do.

[Topjak]

Humans are genetically inclined to go for the fittest girl so their children will live and have a higher chance of passing on the genes. That is how the universe works. Looks have to do with health. If a girl eats McDonalds all the time and doesn't take care of the acne on her face then she is less attractive.

Personally i'd go for the girl who could eat a 3 big macs than a calorie counter.
The only time i'd ever want to watch what i'll eat is when i'm cooking it

PS. I know i cut out 90% of your post buts its 11pm i really cnat be bothered to slice up everyones posts.

[Fomas]

Personally i'd go for the girl who could eat a 3 big macs than a calorie counter.
The only time i'd ever want to watch what i'll eat is when i'm cooking it

Yeh but thats your popinion.
I admit I prefer a girl who looks after her self.

I dont like un healthy people, i think its a waste of a life.