If he was smart it what he was doing, he probably could have. Good thing all the extremists are ******s.
Printable View
We don't call islam terrorists insane, we don't call hitler insane and we shouldn't call brevik insane either. He merely has radical views that took him on a murderous campaign that killed many innocent people and should be locked up accordingly.
Does someone actually have to be insane in order to kill people? I don't think jihadists are insane but they still carry on what they were told to do. It's pure hatred and Islamophobia imo.
He ought to be hung, if found guilty of course.
If he's found guilty I agree he should face the consequences anybody else would face.
What I find shocking is that those who examined him call him "sane". What definition of "sanity" are they using? He clearly is insane. There's no way he acted on a reasonable, rational manner and is in no way "normal". Just because he understands what he did and why he did it does not meet the definition of sanity. It wasn't reasonable behaviour at all, and by calling him sane they make it seem as though he acted like any normal, reasonable member of society :/
Last person executed in Norway during peacetime was 1876, so I think it's fair to say they well and truly abolished the death penalty a long time ago.
I don't really see how it matters whether he's sane or not, he should be punished and put in prison for life either way. Whether he goes in a normal prison or a mental hospital it doesn't matter. I just hope the court case is over quickly as there's no doubt to whether he did it, it'd be an injustice to the families to have it go on for months.