Debunking: Anne Frank Died in Bergen Belsen

shes in my attic alive and well

she stared in AMERICAN HORROR STORY

Edited by e5 (Forum Super Moderator) - Please don't post pointlessly.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FlyingJesus

There is no ad hominem there, I haven't said anything about you. And you're still seemingly trying to claim that anyone with a certain disease can only have it from one place, which is ridiculous

---

If I told you that your religious, sexual, and political beliefs were ridiculous, would that not be considered ad-hominem? What you are doing is exactly that, because you can't come up with a creative response other than "that's ridiculous" when you don't know how to intelligently respond. It was extremely likely Anne would have gotten sick in Auschwitz because a year round cold, muddy swamp is practically a breeding ground for lice, even with delousing chambers.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tallcoolguy700

If I told you that your religious, sexual, and political beliefs were ridiculous, would that not be considered ad-hominem?

---

Nope

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FlyingJesus

Nope

---

Wow. It's considered ad-hominem on social media and you say it isn't.

Saying "this is a bad argument because [insert reason here]" like I've done is not an ad hom. If I'd said "this is wrong because you're tall" that would be an ad hom - an argument based on your personal features rather than your argument. That's not something I've done however, so no, you're completely wrong as usual

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FlyingJesus

Saying "this is a bad argument because [insert reason here]" like I've done is not an ad hom. If I'd said "this is wrong because you're tall" that would be an ad hom - an argument based on your personal features rather than your argument. That's not something I've done however, so no, you're completely wrong as usual

---

We both know you do this because you don't like me. Seriously though, let's stay on topic.

I don't know you, so nope. Wrong again and yet another poor attempt at an argument

I didn't realise that the Nazis were required to photo or video every single person they imprisoned and killed.

It baffles me that you can ignore eyewitness testimony and conclude she must have fallen ill at Auschwitz because she wrote in her diary that she had a weakened immune system? (Did she even write this. Page number please?) Yes she became emaciated and her immune system obviously weakened there but do you have any real evidence that she contracted typhus/died (not sure what you believe really) at Auschwitz?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FlyingJesus

I don't know you, so nope. Wrong again and yet another poor attempt at an argument

---

I asked nicely to stay on topic - is it really that hard?