Windows 7? Worth it?

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

You have to understand, he's incapable of being even remotely reasonable. It would be interesting to see the response to what he's said at Macrumor forums.

Macrumor forums? That's a bunch of trolls trolling trolls trolling trolls etc etc, no good content ever comes from there.

Also @ N!ck, I try to be right wherever I can but occasionally I am wrong, I know that and admit it when I am.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

Macrumor forums? That's a bunch of trolls trolling trolls trolling trolls etc etc, no good content ever comes from there.

Also @ N!ck, I try to be right wherever I can but occasionally I am wrong, I know that and admit it when I am.

Oh shut up, please. You don't know ****.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nick.

Oh shut up, please. You don't know ****.

Please refer to earlier post where I tell you to stop getting flustered, and stop getting flustered.

Thanks in advance! :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

We do compare new things to old things, yes. Though in the technology world comparing two operating systems made 8 years apart typically doesn't happen. I see many more XP vs Windows 7 than I did Vista vs Windows 98.

BUT THEY ARE 9 YEARS APART :eusa_wall :eusa_ange :blue_shoc!!

In all serious now, i reckon Windows 7 looks amazing :D

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

Macrumor forums? That's a bunch of trolls trolling trolls trolling trolls etc etc, no good content ever comes from there.

You clearly don't have any idea what you're talking about. It's quite obvious you're saying whatever you can (no matter how idiotic it sounds) to continue this argument.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

Also @ N!ck, I try to be right wherever I can but occasionally I am wrong

It's far more than occasionally.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

I know that and admit it when I am.

No you don't?

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

You clearly don't have any idea what you're talking about. It's quite obvious you're saying whatever you can (no matter how idiotic it sounds) to continue this argument.

And damn here I am thinking that the sensible thing to do would be to ignore someone causing problems, it looks like you're not very sensible :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

It's far more than occasionally.

No it's not :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

No you don't?

Yes I do, you just don't look in the right sections. Now calm down and go to macrumors and drool at the new iProduct :)

windows 7 is faster and comparing to xp to windows 7 is hardly a decent comparison.. windows 7 has more features so offcourse that will make it not as fast as xp which has alot less features./

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blinger

BUT THEY ARE 9 YEARS APART :eusa_wall :eusa_ange :blue_shoc!!

In all serious now, i reckon Windows 7 looks amazing :D

XP and Windows 7 are 8 years apart lols :S

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

And damn here I am thinking that the sensible thing to do would be to ignore someone causing problems, it looks like you're not very sensible :)

Says the man who insults a forum community that's been around for 9 years, and has members old enough to be your grandfather. I guess sensible people don't exist in this thread?:):)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

No it's not :)

HNNNNNNNNNNG Yes it is:):):)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

Yes I do, you just don't look in the right sections. Now calm down and go to macrumors and drool at the new iProduct :)

The perfect MS fanboy response:):):):):):):):):)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colin-Roberts

windows 7 is faster and comparing to xp to windows 7 is hardly a decent comparison.. windows 7 has more features so offcourse that will make it not as fast as xp which has alot less features./

There are more features in Windows 7. Personally I prefer speed over the features Windows 7 or Vista offered. Vista was bloated, and made every computer I owned with Vista suck. Winows 7 is an improvement, yeah, but it still doesn't beat XP. I'm not going to run Vista or Windows 7 on my low powered Intel Atom netbook, or VMware Fusion on my iMac. Even if either of these two environments had 3x the power they do, XP would still out preform its younger sibblings. The problem I have with Jewish Bear, is that he's one of those people who always want the latest, and newest from Microsoft because he thinks, "it's the newest thing on the market, so it's better." Microsoft can no longer make an operating system, they can just sell one. Jewish Bear insults modern Macs, despite actually using one for his main computer. He assumes Mac users are only Mac users and hate Microsoft with a passion. When I post statistics comparing Windows XP, Vista and Windows 7 from a trusted source (and from a source featured on Engadget) that gives you substantial information about what tests were orchestrated (as so one may replicate the tests to verify they're genuine and so we can easily find out if the tester is dishonest), he Googles statistics with questionable results and vague details, comparing XP to an old version of Windows 7. Of course, when I praised MacRumors, what else could he do but put MacRumors down? This is why, I seldom take what Jewish Bear says seriously. He is incapible of making a constructive post.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

Says the man who insults a forum community that's been around for 9 years, and has members old enough to be your grandfather. I guess sensible people don't exist in this thread?:):)

Thanks for calling me a man, no, yes, not you. 42.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

The perfect MS fanboy response:):):):):):):):):)

Not a fanboy, I hate all operating systems, I just hate Windows the least because it's excellent for gaming.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

There are more features in Windows 7. Personally I prefer speed over the features Windows 7 or Vista offered. Vista was bloated, and made every computer I owned with Vista suck. Winows 7 is an improvement, yeah, but it still doesn't beat XP. I'm not going to run Vista or Windows 7 on my low powered Intel Atom netbook, or VMware Fusion on my iMac. Even if either of these two environments had 3x the power they do, XP would still out preform its younger sibblings.

You've been told that 7 is faster than XP, when will this sink in?

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

The problem I have with Jewish Bear, is that he's one of those people who always want the latest, and newest from Microsoft because he thinks, "it's the newest thing on the market, so it's better."

I want the latest and greatest from everything, you see unlike yourself who is quite content with your iMac and such, which is all fine and dandy, I prefer getting ahead of the game with beta software, new hardware and the like. I don't say things are better if they're not. Vista is better than XP and 7 is better than Vista.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

Microsoft can no longer make an operating system, they can just sell one.

Your logic is flawed.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

Jewish Bear insults modern Macs, despite actually using one for his main computer.

I don't use a mac, I never have and I never will. My computer will always be far more powerful than your "iMac".

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

Of course, when I praised MacRumors, what else could he do but put MacRumors down? This is why, I seldom take what Jewish Bear says seriously. He is incapible of making a constructive post.

You don't realise anyone who takes tech seriously laughs at macrumors for hosting a community of ******s and a full stack of crap news. I am very capable of making a constructive post you just don't view my constructive posts (see: something awful)

Edit: forgot a huge chunk of your blogpost:

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

When I post statistics comparing Windows XP, Vista and Windows 7 from a trusted source (and from a source featured on Engadget) that gives you substantial information about what tests were orchestrated (as so one may replicate the tests to verify they're genuine and so we can easily find out if the tester is dishonest), he Googles statistics with questionable results and vague details, comparing XP to an old version of Windows 7.

Engadget is about as reliable as macrumors, nobody knowledgeable takes any of that network seriously, they're just a bunch of GUYS reviewing games. ZDNet is a large, relatively reliable place to get tech news as it has so many authors and fanboys on both sites it's hard to say it's biased one way or another.

bit-tech are very trusted news sources which actually do reliable tests. I will wait to see what they say before i think of downloading it as a main operating system

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

Not a fanboy, I hate all operating systems, I just hate Windows the least because it's excellent for gaming.

Seeing as you've never owned A Mac and therefore never used OSX as your main OS or you've never used every last Linux Distro on the planet suitable for a desktop, I'd say that your statement is ridiculously stupid.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

You've been told that 7 is faster than XP, when will this sink in?

Before responding to a post, read the entire thread. As I previously stated I already tried Windows 7. It was faster than Vista but slower than XP.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

I want the latest and greatest from everything, you see unlike yourself who is quite content with your iMac and such, which is all fine and dandy, I prefer getting ahead of the game with beta software, new hardware and the like. I don't say things are better if they're not. Vista is better than XP and 7 is better than Vista.

In your own opinion it's better. Then again you said you want the latest and greatest from everything. Therefore you probably think it's better than XP because it's newer.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

Your logic is flawed.

You've failed to elaborate.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

I don't use a mac, I never have and I never will. My computer will always be far more powerful than your "iMac".

Any negative things you say about Macs I'll simply ignore. You have never owned a Mac, therefore you're not able to judge them properly. Until you've actually had the experience of using a Mac and OSX any remarks you make about them are irrelevant and completely pointless.

As long as you're running a bloated unstable operating system your PC is as good as crap IMO.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

You don't realise anyone who takes tech seriously laughs at macrumors for hosting a community of ******s and a full stack of crap news. I am very capable of making a constructive post you just don't view my constructive posts (see: something awful)

Never in a million years would I even suggest that you take tech seriously, or even remotely know what you're talking about. Therefore you wouldn't know; sorry!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

Edit: forgot a huge chunk of your blogpost:

Engadget is about as reliable as macrumors, nobody knowledgeable takes any of that network seriously, they're just a bunch of GUYS reviewing games. ZDNet is a large, relatively reliable place to get tech news as it has so many authors and fanboys on both sites it's hard to say it's biased one way or another.

So a tech blog in 7 different languages with an Alexa rating of 1,360 is just guys reviewing games? Out of the 15 articles on their homepage, not one is reviewing games. Your obvious stupidity regarding Engadget just proves my point. You don't know anything about Engadget, but since I praised Engadget and you want to continue this argument, you have to flame Engadget.

I think if I showed this thread to any MacRumor forum users, Engadget viewers or even CNET viewers they'd most likely think you were a joke. In all the years I've been at HxF I've never seen such a misguided user in the Technology section. Walk out side, throw away your computer. Try doing something you're good at.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

Seeing as you've never owned A Mac and therefore never used OSX as your main OS or you've never used every last Linux Distro on the planet suitable for a desktop, I'd say that your statement is ridiculously stupid.

Sorry are you mentally ill, I use OS X, Linux and Windows regularly, Linux not so much, you don't need a mac to use OS X.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

Before responding to a post, read the entire thread. As I previously stated I already tried Windows 7. It was faster than Vista but slower than XP.

Herp de derp more people have said it's faster.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

Your own ignorance is amusing. The latest is certainly not always the best.

It's an expression chuckles.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

You've failed to elaborate.

They make operating systems.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

Any negative things you say about Macs I'll simply ignore. You have never owned a Mac, therefore you're not able to judge them properly. Until you've actually had the experience of using a Mac and OSX any remarks you make about them are irrelevant and completely pointless.

Hurf durf using a mac is just like any other pc, just with a UNIBODY ALUMINIUM CASE.

Let's put it this way, I've been using OS X on and off for more than 2 years now ;)

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

Never in a million years would I even suggest that you take tech seriously, or even remotely know what you're talking about. Therefore you wouldn't know; sorry!

I would, I do, I build therefore I am.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

So a tech blog in 7 different languages with an Alexa rating of 1,360 is just guys reviewing games? Out of the 15 articles on their homepage, not one is reviewing games. You're obvious stupidity regarding Engadget just proves my point. You don't know anything about Engadget, but since I praised Engadget and you want to continue this argument, you have to flame Engadget.

Already done that. Move along and get with the times.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

I think if I showed this thread to any MacRumor forum users, Engadget viewers or even CNET viewers they'd most likely think you were a joke. In all the years I've been at HxF I've never seen such a missguided user in the Technology section.

MacRumor users are all idiots that LOEV THE MAC like it's some sort of futuristic machine from the year 3000 (no, they do not live underwater).

Engadget viewers are just there to look at the shiny pictures.

Who cares about CNET?

Also, as you seem quite content about going on about this "misguided" thing, I've been dealing with tech problems, fixing pcs, doodling with macs and such, building machines and testing them for several years, I think I'm a wee bit more qualified than you to rant about useless hardware in macs and useless software in OS X.

The ball is in your court now boy, lets see you cloud my experience over with "HURF DURF JSUT CAUSE YOU USE PC FOR YEARS DOESN'T MEAN U CAN REVIEW!!!!!!!!! AND JUGE OS X"

Yes it does, yes I do, yes I can.

Nah XP will be faster by far, so why change :P

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

you don't need a mac to use OS X.

Pardon me for not assuming that you fail to abide by the law.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

Herp de derp more people have said it's faster.

herp de derp, smarter people have said it isn't.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

It's an expression chuckles.

You abide by it, expression or not.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

They make operating systems.

It's an expression chuckles.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

Hurf durf using a mac is just like any other pc, just with a UNIBODY ALUMINIUM CASE.

Let's put it this way, I've been using OS X on and off for more than 2 years now ;)

People who can afford real Macs and don't wish to be in Pystar's shoes actually buy a Mac manufactured by Apple. I'm one of these people.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

I would, I do, I build therefore I am.

BUUUUUUUR. Wrong;).

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

Already done that. Move along and get with the times.

Not a worthy response to what I said at all.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

MacRumor users are all idiots that LOEV THE MAC

Yeah, especially the users in the Windows section who love Windows 7 as much as you?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

Engadget viewers are just there to look at the shiny pictures. Who cares about CNET?

Another case of opposing what I like to continue arguing.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

Also, as you seem quite content about going on about this "misguided" thing, I've been dealing with tech problems, fixing pcs, doodling with macs and such, building machines and testing them for several years, I think I'm a wee bit more qualified than you to rant about useless hardware in macs and useless software in OS X.

You're not some tech god we're all going to worship. Based on what you post I'd say you're not at all more qualified than me. There are a lot more users in the tech section smarter and more experienced than you.

You say you fix pcs and screw around with computers as if nobody else in this section does either. Don't make the mistake of thinking that you're the only user in this section who thinks they're "tech savy".

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

The ball is in your court now boy, lets see you cloud my experience over with "HURF DURF JSUT CAUSE YOU USE PC FOR YEARS DOESN'T MEAN U CAN REVIEW!!!!!!!!! AND JUGE OS X"

Once again you assume you're the only one with experience working with computers. In your case I'd even say your experience doesn't speak for much, as a lot of what you say are the words of an idiot.

You've not said anything logical, nor have you provided me with any proof that what you're saying is genuine. Do you think by saying irrational things and not providing proof is a plausible thing to do? Do you think people will believe you when you can't be bothered to even attempt to to prove what you're saying is genuine?

Stop making funny sounds at me, and start being logical thanks;).

Thankyou for pressing enter twice after each quote, it makes it much easier for me to reply.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

Pardon me for not assuming that you fail to abide by the law.

Like you do?

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

herp de derp, smarter people have said it isn't.

No they haven't. Tech sites != smarter people.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

You abide by it, expression or not.

No I don't.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

People who can afford real Macs and don't wish to be in Pystar's shoes actually buy a Mac manufactured by Apple. I'm one of these people.

My computer is far less expensive expensive than a "Mac" and yet performs so very much better, who's the smart one here?

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

BUUUUUUUR. Wrong;).

Wrong.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

Not a worthy response to what I said at all.

Considering what I can tell from several members of this forum I've asked and their attitude to you, "eat ****" would be a worthy response to most of your posts. Not that I'd answer with that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

Yeah, especially the users in the Windows section who love Windows 7 as much as you?

I don't "Love" Windows 7, I just like it. I don't know where you're getting this love crap from I see a good OS I praise a good OS.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

Another case of opposing what I like to continue arguing.

That's the whole point of an argument, opposition.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

You're not some tech god we're all going to worship. Based on what you post I'd say you're not at all more qualified than me. There are a lot more users in the tech section smarter and more experienced than you.

Sure there are, I'm just one of the smarter ones is all. And I'd imagine (Seeming as Dave did, and he's probably one of the smartest ones) they'd agree with me about 7 aswell.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

You say you fix pcs and screw around with computers as if nobody else in this section does either. Don't make the mistake of thinking that you're the only user in this section who thinks they're "tech savy".

It's meant towards you muffin cakes, that's the point of an argument, to use points against each other until one either admits defeat or the argument comes to a point where there is nothing to argue about anymore.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

Once again you assume you're the only one with expierience working with computers. In your case I'd even say your expierience doesn't speak for much, as a lot of what you say are the words of an idiot.

They're the words of a well trained gentleman.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

You've not said anything logical, nor have you provided me with any proof that what you're saying is genuine. Do you think by saying irrational things and not providing proof is a plausable thing to do? Do you think people will believe you when you can't prove what you're saying?

Do you know what logical means? Apparently not. (Don't wikipedia it).

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

Thankyou for pressing enter twice after each quote, it makes it much easier for me to reply.

You're welcome.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

Like you do?

I haven't, nor will I pirate OSX.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

No they haven't. Tech sites != smarter people.

I spot an error in your code. I would trust a tech site reviewer who gets paid to do reviews and is experienced doing reviews over some arrogant kid on HxF.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

No I don't.

Yes you do.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

My computer is far less expensive expensive than a "Mac" and yet performs so very much better, who's the smart one here?

I have a nice all in one unit, running a genuine non-illegal operating system with an ALUMINUM BODY CASE. Obviously price doesn't matter to me, though if it did I could justify that the HP all-in-one equivalent of an iMac is in the same price range. Also, I can justify that the extra money is worth it, as I'm getting a much more secure and stable operating system.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

Wrong.

Don't you mean BUUUUUUR wrong?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

Considering what I can tell from several members of this forum I've asked and their attitude to you, "eat ****" would be a worthy response to most of your posts. Not that I'd answer with that.

They must not be very smart users, if they'd tell someone else to eat ****

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

I don't "Love" Windows 7, I just like it. I don't know where you're getting this love crap from I see a good OS I praise a good OS.

You love it because it's the latest operating system from Microsoft.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

That's the whole point of an argument, opposition.

disagreeing with someone for the sake of disagreeing. You're very mature.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

Sure there are, I'm just one of the smarter ones is all.

Well....you made me laugh. The stupidity you've shown us in this thread alone is enough to justify that you're not one of the smarter ones.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

It's meant towards you muffin cakes, that's the point of an argument, to use points against each other until one either admits defeat or the argument comes to a point where there is nothing to argue about anymore.

You should also back up your claims as well as you can. This you've failed to do.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

They're the words of a well trained gentleman.

Don't flatter me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

Do you know what logical means? Apparently not. (Don't wikipedia it).

You certainly don't know what logical means. Half of what you say are your bias opinions. When you do try to say a fact it's typically wrong, and unsupported by evidence.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

I haven't, nor will I pirate OSX.

I wasn't on about just OS X.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

I spot an error in your code.

pseudocode

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

I would trust a tech site reviewer who gets paid to do reviews and is experienced doing reviews over some arrogant kid on HxF.

I wouldn't trust them, nor would I trust the kid, but then again I'm not a kid I'm an expert programmer.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

Yes you do.

No I don't.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

I have a nice all in one unit, running a genuine non-illegal operating system with an ALUMINUM BODY CASE.

I have a nice powerful computer running a genuine non-illegal operating system with a HARD STEEL CASE. And blue LEDs to make it go faster.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

Obviously price doesn't matter to me, though if it did I could justify that the HP all-in-one equivalent of an iMac is in the same price range. Also, I can justify that the extra money is worth it, as I'm getting a much more secure and stable operating system.

OS X isn't any more stable than Windows Vista on the right hardware. You're paying for overpriced off-the-shelf hardware. Enjoy doing that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

Don't you mean BUUUUUUR wrong?

No I mean Wrong.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

They must not be very smart users, if they'd tell someone else to eat ****

They're a lot smarter than you are.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

You love it because it's the latest operating system from Microsoft.

I don't love it at all.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

disagreeing with someone for the sake of disagreeing. You're very mature.

To put it in your words "disagreeing with someone for the sake of disagreeing. You're very mature."

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

Well....you made me laugh. The stupidity you've shown us in this thread alone is enough to justify that you're not one of the smarter ones.

No you're just seeing stupidity cause you're dim, and that's what this argument is about, dim people arguing with non dim people.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

You should also back up your claims as well as you can. This you've failed to do.

:toot: most things can be found by googling! google is a useful tool.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

Don't flatter me.

I was referring to myself. Not that you'd pick up on that :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

You certainly don't know what logical means. Half of what you say are your bias opinions. When you do try to say a fact it's typically wrong, and unsupported by evidence.

All I have to say to that is: Intentional Logical Fallacies.

Windows 7 is faster than XP.
Fact.

Move on.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tomm

Windows 7 is faster than XP.
Fact.

Move on.

c00kie for tom :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaveTaylor

c00kie for tom :)

Seconding that!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

pseudocode

Are you an idiot? The problem was you says tech sites are not smarter people, when you should have said tech sites = smarter people

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

I wouldn't trust them, nor would I trust the kid, but then again I'm not a kid I'm an expert programmer.

LOL no you're not.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

No I don't.

Yes you do.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

I have a nice powerful computer running a genuine non-illegal operating system with a HARD STEEL CASE. And blue LEDs to make it go faster.

I was referring to your hackintosh being illegal.

ew @ HARD STEEL CASE;).

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

OS X isn't any more stable than Windows Vista on the right hardware. You're paying for overpriced off-the-shelf hardware. Enjoy doing that.

OSX is more stable than Windows Vista. Do you even have any idea what you're saying?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

No I mean Wrong.

So you're stopping making those childish and useless sounds then?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

They're a lot smarter than you are.

Depends on which users they are.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

I don't love it at all.

Liar.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

No you're just seeing stupidity cause you're dim, and that's what this argument is about, dim people arguing with non dim people.

You being the dim people.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

:toot: most things can be found by googling! google is a useful tool.

You should use it more often to provide evidence for what you say.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

I was referring to myself. Not that you'd pick up on that :)

You must not have gotten the sarcasm in that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

All I have to say to that is: Intentional Logical Fallacies.

I stand by what I said.

You have fun with your arguments HotelUser I am going to shut up like Tomm said and just nod and agree with him.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

You have fun with your arguments HotelUser

Do not forget that you were a participant (and instigator) of this argument.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

I am going to shut up like Tomm said and just nod and agree with him.

We will agree to disagree;).

I've loked at many reviews commparing Windows 7 and XP, and the majority even say that XP is faster than WIndows 7

IMHO, XP is faster than 7.

Umm Id use windows 7 as it i fatsre than vista and XP Tbh Im runing XP on my laptop and computer as I hatew vista but u know im geting windows 7 :P

Quote:

Originally Posted by x-glow

Umm Id use windows 7 as it i fatsre than vista and XP Tbh Im runing XP on my laptop and computer as I hatew vista but u know im geting windows 7 :P

Sorry but, you don't seem to have any experience using Windows 8 say how can you say it is? at least you don't seem to have ever used it. Anyway it's your opinion which is faster, not fact.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nick.

Sorry but, you don't seem to have any experience using Windows 8 say how can you say it is? at least you don't seem to have ever used it. Anyway it's your opinion which is faster, not fact.

ZOMG WINDOWS 8, DOWNLOAD LINK PLOX

As Dave has said, using actual facts and proving tests not individual experiences in general/ on average windows 7 is faster then windows xp. Mac being more stable then windows vista? I don't think so. if you look at the market percentage and other variables, macs and windows would be a lot more comparable in errors.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colin-Roberts

As Dave has said, using actual facts and proving tests not individual experiences in general/ on average windows 7 is faster then windows xp. Mac being more stable then windows vista? I don't think so. if you look at the market percentage and other variables, macs and windows would be a lot more comparable in errors.

There's a lot of statistics saying XP is faster than Windows 7 too.

Are you saying that the more users an operating system has, the more errors it has:S

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

There's a lot of statistics saying XP is faster than Windows 7 too.

Are you saying that the more users an operating system has, the more errors it has:S

That stands to reason.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jewish Bear

That stands to reason.

The Windows developers did more poorly because there's more Windows users then:P?

Windows 7 is really good according to my mum...

I have got Widnows 7 as it is On my Laptop, And Yes I guess it is my opinion but it is faster than this computer (XP)

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotelUser

The Windows developers did more poorly because there's more Windows users then:P?

No moron, the more people that use an OS the more errors in total occur.