
Macrumor forums? That's a bunch of trolls trolling trolls trolling trolls etc etc, no good content ever comes from there.
Also @ N!ck, I try to be right wherever I can but occasionally I am wrong, I know that and admit it when I am.
visit my internet web site on the internet
http://dong.engineer/
it is just videos by bill wurtz videos you have been warned
Oh shut up, please. You don't know ****.
That went fast.
visit my internet web site on the internet
http://dong.engineer/
it is just videos by bill wurtz videos you have been warned
BUT THEY ARE 9 YEARS APART :eusa_wall :eusa_ange :blue_shoc!!
In all serious now, i reckon Windows 7 looks amazing![]()
You clearly don't have any idea what you're talking about. It's quite obvious you're saying whatever you can (no matter how idiotic it sounds) to continue this argument.It's far more than occasionally.No you don't?
I'm not crazy, ask my toaster.
And damn here I am thinking that the sensible thing to do would be to ignore someone causing problems, it looks like you're not very sensible
No it's not
Yes I do, you just don't look in the right sections. Now calm down and go to macrumors and drool at the new iProduct![]()
visit my internet web site on the internet
http://dong.engineer/
it is just videos by bill wurtz videos you have been warned
windows 7 is faster and comparing to xp to windows 7 is hardly a decent comparison.. windows 7 has more features so offcourse that will make it not as fast as xp which has alot less features./
.:.:#14:.:. .:.: Impossible Is Nothing :.:. .:.: 845 Rep:.:.
.:.: Stand up for what is right, even if you stand alone:.:.
Says the man who insults a forum community that's been around for 9 years, and has members old enough to be your grandfather. I guess sensible people don't exist in this thread?HNNNNNNNNNNG Yes it is
The perfect MS fanboy response
There are more features in Windows 7. Personally I prefer speed over the features Windows 7 or Vista offered. Vista was bloated, and made every computer I owned with Vista suck. Winows 7 is an improvement, yeah, but it still doesn't beat XP. I'm not going to run Vista or Windows 7 on my low powered Intel Atom netbook, or VMware Fusion on my iMac. Even if either of these two environments had 3x the power they do, XP would still out preform its younger sibblings. The problem I have with Jewish Bear, is that he's one of those people who always want the latest, and newest from Microsoft because he thinks, "it's the newest thing on the market, so it's better." Microsoft can no longer make an operating system, they can just sell one. Jewish Bear insults modern Macs, despite actually using one for his main computer. He assumes Mac users are only Mac users and hate Microsoft with a passion. When I post statistics comparing Windows XP, Vista and Windows 7 from a trusted source (and from a source featured on Engadget) that gives you substantial information about what tests were orchestrated (as so one may replicate the tests to verify they're genuine and so we can easily find out if the tester is dishonest), he Googles statistics with questionable results and vague details, comparing XP to an old version of Windows 7. Of course, when I praised MacRumors, what else could he do but put MacRumors down? This is why, I seldom take what Jewish Bear says seriously. He is incapible of making a constructive post.
I'm not crazy, ask my toaster.
Thanks for calling me a man, no, yes, not you. 42.
Not a fanboy, I hate all operating systems, I just hate Windows the least because it's excellent for gaming.
You've been told that 7 is faster than XP, when will this sink in?There are more features in Windows 7. Personally I prefer speed over the features Windows 7 or Vista offered. Vista was bloated, and made every computer I owned with Vista suck. Winows 7 is an improvement, yeah, but it still doesn't beat XP. I'm not going to run Vista or Windows 7 on my low powered Intel Atom netbook, or VMware Fusion on my iMac. Even if either of these two environments had 3x the power they do, XP would still out preform its younger sibblings.
I want the latest and greatest from everything, you see unlike yourself who is quite content with your iMac and such, which is all fine and dandy, I prefer getting ahead of the game with beta software, new hardware and the like. I don't say things are better if they're not. Vista is better than XP and 7 is better than Vista.
Your logic is flawed.
I don't use a mac, I never have and I never will. My computer will always be far more powerful than your "iMac".
You don't realise anyone who takes tech seriously laughs at macrumors for hosting a community of ******s and a full stack of crap news. I am very capable of making a constructive post you just don't view my constructive posts (see: something awful)
Edit: forgot a huge chunk of your blogpost:
Engadget is about as reliable as macrumors, nobody knowledgeable takes any of that network seriously, they're just a bunch of GUYS reviewing games. ZDNet is a large, relatively reliable place to get tech news as it has so many authors and fanboys on both sites it's hard to say it's biased one way or another.When I post statistics comparing Windows XP, Vista and Windows 7 from a trusted source (and from a source featured on Engadget) that gives you substantial information about what tests were orchestrated (as so one may replicate the tests to verify they're genuine and so we can easily find out if the tester is dishonest), he Googles statistics with questionable results and vague details, comparing XP to an old version of Windows 7.
Last edited by Jewish Bear; 26-01-2009 at 07:31 PM.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!