Printable View
Maybe you should think about WWII, now that was a war with a purpose, and thats what really brought us together. Now though it makes us feel abliged to help when in reality its not a very good idea.Quote:
Originally Posted by GommeInc
Im sorry for getting into this mess but what im saying is that it is not a belief that troops came solely from england, it is merely a mistake.Quote:
Originally Posted by *.Glitter.Rip.*
Actaly its teh twin towers that realy broght uk and the usa together. teh americans only joined ww2 after the geman subs destroed one of there passinger ships, as teh american people counlnt see any point of gettin goinvoved with something the other side of teh globe. same reson the leage of natiosn faild, erly version of erope, even thogh taht had alot of other problems, its only quite resntly contrys have started to take notice of things ahppenoing around teh globe, as becuse of the incres in ease of tarve, somthing the othetr side of teh world can not affect them dircetsly?
Dunno if anyone has said this but .it is spelled Iraq lol. no biggy
Anyway i think the war was unneeded. though it is good to have saddam out but so many people have been affected over this I'm sure you don't need thousand of trrops to get one guy a few hundred at most lol and always get backup if needed.. I mean , saddam is bad and all but so is Bush. They are as bad as each other lol. apart from that Bush is complete dunce. When he said " they never stop thinking of ways to hurt our country , and neither do we" lol lol lol!
you quote reminds me of 2dtv :D posibly the triple laugh bit. anyway, overthrowing sadam was the easy bit, getting control of the contry and ficing teh power vacume were the hard parts, becuse of the now hight terrim levs that exist there cuurrnatly, i donmt think its much better off with sadam gone :/
No me neither , the army and the government are just as bad except the torturs bit thingy. apart from they army people who made that guy stand up on the thing which was really sick
I think the Twin Towers accident brought Europe and the US together not just England, as the Twin Towers incident effected the whole world because they are the World Trade Centre.
well england and america have been "united" for quite a while now i would say.
and i aklways thought that the war in iraq was because of the "wepons of mass distruction" that sadam had.......... it was said that he refused a couple of inspection and we pressumed he had wepons, and yes a few were actually found. but i belive talks should have lasted that little bit longer.
The fact that they were looking for the wrong person, Saddam had nothing to do with the terror attacks on the Twin Towers.
It was Osamo Bin Ladle, he was the one that caused the attack and Bush (idiot as he is) went foolishly into attacking the wrong people therefore causing this mess we are in now, idiot.
Well to those of you who are in countries who are in Iraq, you should support the war because people are dieing for you. And it is said over 75% of troops in Iraq support the war fully. More people should do their patriotic duty.
Also, Saddm needed to be taken out of power, he killed 200,000 plus Iraqis during his reign.
It was britan and america espaly thogh, as it craeted teh friend ship between bush and tont blare.Quote:
Originally Posted by GommeInc
True. but now bush is makeing the same sort if abuses of human rights as sadam hosain, just as bad in some cases, yet if america was inaded, i bet they would stiull fight for it freedom even if they were fighting for americans.Quote:
Originally Posted by Butcher11
Gorge bush attackd irack becuse of teh oil fileds, as tehy had nothing to do with 9/11 and they wernt habporing terrists, athogh after teh irck war they now are.
If america inveded to help teh human rights, there are contrys on the boarders of america with things just as bad, there not being invaded thogh?
If it was becuse they thoght they had wepons of mass destrution? north cariea does jave wepons of mass destrution, yet there not being indvaded.
so in my opinon there are alot of hiddem motive sin this war, if you consider gorege bush senior (gorge 2 bush's father) failed in his war on teh same contry? is this revenge? is it becuse of teh oil?.
Also why does amerca when russia invade, stop them by craeting things like teh taliban etc (bin larden was trained by the CIA)
But whe america inavde there magicly on the side of good, and if russia helped them they woild be accused of funing terrists, even thogh funding terrist is exsactly what america did?