Irack

[Mentor]

Should the coiltion ahve gon in to irack? what do you think.

personaly i belive athogh somthing needed to be done about sadam and his terribe resime going to war was the wrong desison. irack may have been terrible but it was at leats stable, now every day or so you hear storys of termism and how the contry is collaping due to teh power vacume. i cant see hwy the goivemny belive a westn democrys wil function over there. plus i also dont belive infocing it was the aim. as there are plently of other cointrys wit hteh smae problems. why irack, i think it may have been becus eof the aubunet ioil feailds. rather than acatly helping the people.
but oien think i DO eblive is we shoudl not pull out now. the damage has been done, pulling out wil only make things far far worse, as it wil inspre terrims and a bace for alkida, who athogh wre esaid to be in irack were proved not to be. but could easly make it ther hoem if teh colition pulled out now.
plus people must remmber teh irakies we call terrorist are freedom fighters to there own people, woudl u just sit back if your contry was invaded and forsed under someone elses rule? plus who are we to say are syetsm are better than theres? nd that we are on teh right side and tehy are on the wrong, in this conflict, i think tehry are in teh right, we are in teh worng. athogh i do agree that teh coiltion shoudl stabilse teh contry to the best of there abiltys before they pull out, as it would be a far worse thing to just let teh conmtry crumble and collaps.
do you think teh war was justifed or right, and do you thin kwe shoudl pull out? what do you think

[GommeInc]

The war was supposedly over the 9/11 terrorist attack, but Iraq had nothing to do with this it was Alquada (forgive my spelling, it sounds like al-ka-ee-da), and they are located in a hige mountain range east of Iraq, I dont see the point of the war basically.

[Mentor]

They were never in irack ro assoited with it. how can peopel sya that why, when asma bin larden is hiding and still hasnt been cught, how is attcking a contry thats not invoved with him, supposed to help them, sounlnt they try useing there resorse on going after teh colprit alkida rather than attcking irack, il admin it was a horible place but one of a resonable nuumber, many on americas own boarders, so if it was a humnitrian issue why dint that start there?

[GommeInc]

Thats what i find funny, Saddam and Osamo never actually communicated! Bush is a right pin head at times, saying there is no French word for entrepreneur which IS A FRENCH WORD, the English /Americans dont have the word.

[Butcher11]

Well, personally I can't wait until I turn 18 to join to go over to Iraq, and I think the war is justified. Of course, if the US didn't do something about the 20,000 civilian Iraqis Saddam had killed over the past 2 yearsm=, we would be considered unsymathetic to their plight. Also, he never fully submitted to the UN weapons inspections.

[-Soro-]

This is a subject there will always be two sides in no matter what happens. We all know Saddam was a dictator and was cruel to his people. Many people believe removing him from his position was right and was a good reason to go to war despite finding no evidence of any nukes... However, I believe these are not strong enough reasons to go to war in any situation and I think we have destroyed Iraq's natural way of life, causing more fighting and killing than ever. If we were to declare war on every country that was being treated differently to ours, we would end up wiping out half the world's population. Did we go to war for the right reasons? Or was it really a way of Bush assuring he'd retain his position as the most powerful man in the world.

Edit: Please note I don't strongly disagree with what you say Butch, I just think that what we have done will not prevent another 20,000 dying over the same period of time from now.

[Concentric]

Speaking from a British point of view i personally think we should not have gone along holding America's hand on all these issues. If they want to get themselves into a stupid mess than thats their problem, but we're now involved thanks to our "special relationship" :@

[GommeInc]

We shouldn't of gone to war with America to fight Iraq, we lost 40 People because Americans dont know what the Union Jack and the EU flag is!!!

[*.Glitter.Rip.*]

Its Iraq
anyway I believe that we shouldnt of gone to Iraq for a start this wasnt our buissness. Second It was a set up I believe since at the time america had very low Oil but guess what? Iraq had the second largest oil there if you know what I mean. Soon America shot up a lot of oil! Very suspisous eh?



Anyway this is my belief so nobody start to argue with me! You wouldnt have much proof for a starter and second I would only know this for sure if I was Bush himself.


England I know made a stupid mistake sending out those troops since they have caused a huge corruption there! Worst thing That has happened! I am from England by the way.

[Concentric]

England I know made a stupid mistake sending out those troops since they have caused a huge corruption there! Worst thing That has happened! I am from England by the way.

They were BRITISH troops, regements from Scotland and Wales too. Great Britain constitutes Scotland and Wales as well as England :rolleyes: