Meh that was only bit I was dissapointed with - she wasn't in it that long. But, the bit she is in is really funny.Quote:
Originally Posted by stickwitu
Printable View
Meh that was only bit I was dissapointed with - she wasn't in it that long. But, the bit she is in is really funny.Quote:
Originally Posted by stickwitu
Hmm... actually I have many "humourous bones" in my body; that was quite a lame statement to make. There is a huge difference in what is funny and what is not, and Superhero Movie is an example of this. You are the minority I'm afraid.Quote:
Originally Posted by Frodo13.
As for my commentary on Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, I am far from biased - I am impartial - and pride myself in being so. I have indeed been a life-long fan of the first three films, and you saying that the fourth is garbage is your opinion, which is fine - but I know that it's constructed from an attack on the sci-fi aspect of the film, and thus your very negative review of it is extremely laughable. Perhaps it would be an idea to obtain some knowledge of film before attempting to comment.
oh, if she isn't in it much i ain't gonna see it then :P
she's the only character bit in the scary movies that ALWAYS makes me laugh, no matter how many times i watch them
and urgh shut up trying to be a film critic, that's nothing to be proud of being because half of the time no one listens to them anyway - they are biased and most of them don't have the ability to enjoy movies, they just analyse them.. ruining the whole point of them really.
if you wanna force your opinions and express yourself go to a film forum, 'cuz no one else really gives a toss.
It gets bad ratings because it's just so poorly written...
They aren't interested in that, they're more interested in conspiracy theories about critics hating all comedies.Quote:
Originally Posted by Axel
This IS a film forum.Quote:
Originally Posted by stickwitu
The proof that people listen to me, or more to the point, read and follow me is the amount of mail I receive from readers of my column in the newspaper which I write for. I apologise for yourself as you obviously have zero manners.
it isnt a film forum lmao.
'HABBO' forum, its under movies but i thin writing a massive review on a film the lads already seen is just pointless. i dont think its badly written, its just what your sense of humour is really, you cant say no one in the world will not laugh at the jokes in the movie.
i deffo wanna watch it cuz i love films like that. dunno when though.
My point is, that critics, like yourself, often pan comical performances due to 'thin scripts' and 'bad acting', which in films like this make the film funny. As I've already said, films such as 'White Chicks' and the 'Scary Movie' francise were panned by the critics, however they have probably the largest fan base of any comedy film. I don't believe I am a minority either - the entire cinema was in tears of laughter during the film. Oh, and just because I don't write reviews for my local newspapers, and trying to make myself the owner of the film forum, does not mean I don't know what makes a good film:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Misawa
Indy is awful because Ford no longer fits the part. I surely don't get a thrill out of a 65 year old man 'cracking his whip'. There is also, IMO, poor acting and no significant or anything signicficantly new stunt and technilogical wise. And yes, the Sci-Fi element was just utter garbage, and solely destroyed a franchise. It's a god-damm awful movie. And despite you saying your 'impartial', in doesn't hide the fact your article appeard biased, making it a very poor and unconvincing review.
Because the people there thought it looked funny, so they went to go see it. You wouldn't go to see it if you weren't prepared for cheap crap unless you're a critic or something.Quote:
Originally Posted by Frodo13.