how many super mods do you want???

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lµke

I find this highly ironic that after nearly 3 months since one of the last moderation reports said 'I will be promoting 1-2 people to the smod in the next few days'.

And the recent events that followed, you suddenly spring into action, and play favourites with those who didn't sign the thread in the forum moderators section.

Well i find it hard to believe that someone who has been here less than 2 months, and in their moderation reports made no attempt to become smod gets the position.

The moderation standard is falling on this forum, and fast, thats probly why you've got alot of silly infractions being issued.

This is my last words on the saga, as im sick of management dodging my questions via threads and PM, and 'brushing it up under the carpet'.

---

I hope that that criticism isn't aimed at me, and using myself as an example. :(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ---MAD---

Points that you have made that I am referring to are in bold.
Point 1: That rule is no longer in place now :).

Point 2: Smods and admins don't need mod logs.

Point 3: If you had the power to remove your bad rep, I bet you a million dollars you would remove it. I don't think tomlegend would remove it but I bet you would :).

---

Only if you knew me. When I was smod, I got bad rep from people I warned. I reported them as normal if I thought it was unfair.
On the other hand ... admins (such as Baving and Seacat) used to turn the bad rep into good rep and bad rep the other user, and increase the -rep. So instead of it being -15, it was like -30.
Smods DO need mod logs. It says it in the smod forum. "smod's logs will be checked daily and if we think you dont have enough mod logs, you will no longer be a smod"
maybe its changed now, but that kinda explains why there is so much power abuse.

there goes my chance of being a mod again (disagreeing with AGM)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ---MAD---

Point 3: If you had the power to remove your bad rep, I bet you a million dollars you would remove it. I don't think tomlegend would remove it but I bet you would :).

---

so you're basically saying that you are not bothered if staff abuse their powers?! cause that's what that sounds like..

I bet ---MAD--- has no bad reps :)

Quote:

---

I bet ---MAD--- has no bad reps

---

lol@the fact I just had a few people on MSN and on here telling me "I agree. I would post it, but i would probably get fired".

A great place where the staff cant say anything bad about management.

Edited by ---MAD--- (Forum Manager): Please do not double post.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ksoz

I bet ---MAD--- has no bad reps :)

---

You are wrong as usual :P.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ---MAD---

You are wrong as usual :P.

---

Wrong as usual?
You perm banned me for sending you a pm which said something along the lines of "i dont like you". If I was wrong, I wouldnt have been unbanned. But then you went and banned me again >.>

OMG, I THOUGH THE SMODS WERE BAD. MAD, if you didnt know, you CAN double post after 15 mins. Unless the rules have been changed again ...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Forum Rules

C4. Double Posting - Double posting is allowed after the 15 minutes have passed if you are adding new information. Otherwise it is not allowed to double post.

---

Point prooven? Power abuse.

Hello,

Why does it always it ends up in an argument or a bad debate?

Theres a famous verse I can give you:

"Nor knowest thou what argument
Thy life to thy neighbor's creed has lent.
All are needed by each one;
Nothing is fair or good alone."

Its pretty self-explanatory!

Peace only comes when you speak to your enemies and not your friends.

A friend once said to me, what you hate in others you hate in yourself, I bow out on that. My view.

Good night.

Quote:

---

Peace only comes when you speak to your enemies and not your friends.

---

So we shouldn't speak to our friends?
Hmm sounds dumb to me.

oh btw, great way to dodge my accusations.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ksoz

So we shouldn't speak to our friends?
Hmm sounds dumb to me.

oh btw, great way to dodge my accusations.

---

No, off course you should speak to your friends. I did not say that, I was issuing peace, and not socialising.

We should speak to our enemies, or people we disagree with to think of a solution, in your case, ---MAD---. Another example, Tony Blair - Failed warmonger who can't think of solutions & we all know George Bush is similar.

Anyway, lets get back onto topic, super mods! :D

Tom