They weren't quite full strength, but they weren't missing 9 first teamers.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolves,
And Chaingang, fair enough. There's nothing that I wildly disagree with. All matters of opinion.
Printable View
They weren't quite full strength, but they weren't missing 9 first teamers.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolves,
And Chaingang, fair enough. There's nothing that I wildly disagree with. All matters of opinion.
Exactly, so nothing bad can be said about that performance.
There wasn't anything too bad with the preformance at all given the players there, the heat, and the team they were playing. They were missing: Ronaldinho, Pato, Juan and Robinho too, not sure why Ronaldinho and Pato weren't playing. I know Pato isn't really a first choice player but he should be. A full strength Brazil vs a Full Strength England at the world cup would be a completely different match.
Ronaldinho and Pato don't even make the team.
It really, really can.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolves,
That's the England squad. The squad is abysmal.
if people are trying to say that England would've won that with a full squad, then I think they are wrong, like I said, Brazil should've been 3 up.
Yeah, 3 up against a sub side. Against a full team it wouldn't have been that bad. I'm not saying England would have won as I'd still say Brazil would have been favourites but England would have had a shot at winning and I wouldn't bet against it either.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ardemax
And yeah I know Pato doesn't make it. He will do eventually though but he should really be in the squad, maybe not the first team. Ronaldinho still has it, don't care what people say. He isn't as good as before obviously but he is still a good player and should make the squad.
i fink england are crap lol
Yeah Jack but a tad better than Liverpool. :rolleyes:
I never have much hope when I'm watching England, don't even find it very interesting.
Last season Liverpool was basically Spain lol.