They weren't quite full strength, but they weren't missing 9 first teamers.
And Chaingang, fair enough. There's nothing that I wildly disagree with. All matters of opinion.
Exactly, so nothing bad can be said about that performance.
PSN: StefanWolves
Add me if you play COD Black Ops or Fifa 11.
There wasn't anything too bad with the preformance at all given the players there, the heat, and the team they were playing. They were missing: Ronaldinho, Pato, Juan and Robinho too, not sure why Ronaldinho and Pato weren't playing. I know Pato isn't really a first choice player but he should be. A full strength Brazil vs a Full Strength England at the world cup would be a completely different match.
Ronaldinho and Pato don't even make the team.
PSN: StefanWolves
Add me if you play COD Black Ops or Fifa 11.
if people are trying to say that England would've won that with a full squad, then I think they are wrong, like I said, Brazil should've been 3 up.
"There are only two important days in your life: the day you are born, and the day you find out why."
Mark Twain
Yeah, 3 up against a sub side. Against a full team it wouldn't have been that bad. I'm not saying England would have won as I'd still say Brazil would have been favourites but England would have had a shot at winning and I wouldn't bet against it either.
And yeah I know Pato doesn't make it. He will do eventually though but he should really be in the squad, maybe not the first team. Ronaldinho still has it, don't care what people say. He isn't as good as before obviously but he is still a good player and should make the squad.
i fink england are crap lol
Yeah Jack but a tad better than Liverpool. :rolleyes:
PSN: StefanWolves
Add me if you play COD Black Ops or Fifa 11.
I never have much hope when I'm watching England, don't even find it very interesting.
Last season Liverpool was basically Spain lol.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!